Quantcast

Is Romney too rich to be president?

angelbaby 2012/07/12 21:45:30
Mitt Romney's wealth has made him a target of the Obama team's "Eat the Rich" campaign, but how is Mitt perceived by ordinary voters?

Gallup:

Three-quarters of registered voters say the fact that Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney is worth more than $200 million makes no difference to their likelihood of voting for him. However, 20% of voters, mostly Democrats and independents, say Romney's wealth makes them less likely to vote for him, while 4% say it makes them more likely.

The Obama campaign has targeted Romney's wealth in recent weeks, stressing his net worth and how he earned it as head of Bain Capital, where he has invested it, and the fact that he has not released all of his tax returns from the last decade. Obama's campaign is apparently using Romney's wealth in its efforts to convince voters that Romney is not as well-equipped as Obama to understand the problems and needs of middle- and lower-class Americans. The Romney campaign has pushed back, stressing that voters are more interested in fixing the economy than in the candidates' personal financial situations.

Gallup's July 9-10 results show that most Americans say Romney's wealth does not matter. Those who say it does make a difference tilt five to one toward saying it makes them less likely, rather than more likely, to vote for him for president.

Most of the 37% of Democratic voters who say Romney's wealth is a negative are unlikely to vote for him to begin with. Gallup's latest demographic analysis shows that 89% of Democratic registered voters prefer Obama, compared with 6% supporting Romney.

This is very encouraging for Romney. Americans have always looked up to successful people and while the super rich -- like the Rockefellers and DuPonts -- have always been suspect when they enter politics, they've had little trouble getting elected.

This is more evidence that Obama's class warfare rhetoric is designed more to fire up his base than hurt Romney with other voters. ~~Rick Moran
You!
Add Photos & Videos

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • dominic garcia 2012/07/20 02:50:29
    dominic garcia
    +1
    I am glad that he is rich, he has known what it feels like to have everything. Plenty of presidents in the past have been rich, it is not a big deal. If anything, he can apply his expertise in reconstucting our economy. We have gone the wrong way.
  • angelbaby dominic... 2012/07/20 03:00:56
    angelbaby
    +1
    Since when did being wealthy become almost criminal? Lol ~. I think his knowledge of the economy
    Is very much needed!! These goofs obviously don't know which way is up.
  • dominic... angelbaby 2012/07/20 03:18:13
    dominic garcia
    +1
    Exactly just doesn't make sense. Damned if you do and damned if you don't. We conservatives are expected to be perfect, while the liberals dance all over the constitution, laws, regulations, rules thinking they are the only ones that are exempt.
  • angelbaby dominic... 2012/07/20 03:36:06
    angelbaby
    +1
    I have a feeling that's about to change~
  • Phyl *In God i Trust* 2012/07/20 01:59:50
    Phyl *In God i Trust*
    +2
    Never. His money does not stop him from being a great president.
  • angelbaby Phyl *I... 2012/07/20 02:55:42
    angelbaby
    You're so right .. It doesn't matter!
  • drdos1943 2012/07/20 01:23:23
    drdos1943
    +2
    We've had quite a few significant wealthy presidents, the most notable one being George Washington, much more wealthy than Romney, if elected, will ever be. Herbert Hoover was so wealthy that he refused to accept the presidential salary. Then there is FDR and JFK. However, if Romney is elected, he will have been the only president with self-made wealth.
  • angelbaby drdos1943 2012/07/20 01:55:01
    angelbaby
    +2
    Very informative ~ thank you
  • jeane drdos1943 2012/07/21 22:02:46 (edited)
    jeane
    +2
    Too true - but no one wants to hear it.
  • ComeOnNow 2012/07/20 00:22:41
    ComeOnNow
    +1
    That is a dumb question. The real question should be has Obama ever accomplished anything in his life to deserve to be president, and when he has failed so bad his first term, who is dumb enough to vote for him again. We should want someone that is successful as president.
  • angelbaby ComeOnNow 2012/07/20 01:57:24
    angelbaby
    +3
    I couldn't agree with you more .. My question was in response to liberal hypocrites who claim "Romney must be evil because he's rich"
  • mwg0735 2012/07/13 04:30:41
  • angelbaby mwg0735 2012/07/20 01:58:15
    angelbaby
    +1
    What a refreshing thought!! :)
  • Jerry 2012/07/13 03:43:25
    Jerry
    +1
    .......... We still don't know His total wealth, He hasn't revealed what He has paid in previous tax years, let alone this year.........I have a real problem with Him, on this issue...........
  • drdos1943 Jerry 2012/07/20 01:26:11 (edited)
    drdos1943
    +1
    His total wealth is about 250 million, some of it here and much of it outside the U.S.. That is a published fact taken from his 2011 tax return. Anyone of wealth has got to be stupid if they keep all of their money here, so no one of wealth keeps all of it in the U.S.

    Do you have a problem with many of Obama's administration members who have evaded their taxes? If not, then your concern is mute. Romney's wealth is not a relevant issue. The economy, jobs, etc. are.
  • Vision of Verve 2012/07/13 01:55:45
  • angelbaby Vision ... 2012/07/20 01:59:12
    angelbaby
    It really doesn't matter does it?
  • John Hall 2012/07/13 00:03:29
    John Hall
    +2
    I don't worry or get mad at how he made or how he spends it . I worry about how Obama spends my money .
  • TasselLady 2012/07/12 21:47:52
  • angelbaby TasselLady 2012/07/12 21:48:46
    angelbaby
    +2
    Does Obama relate to the poor folks?
  • TasselLady angelbaby 2012/07/12 21:49:55
    TasselLady
    He tries. But somebody like Romney who is Republican cares only about big business and the rich and well off. Why would he want anything to do with we poor folks?
  • angelbaby TasselLady 2012/07/12 21:57:29 (edited)
    angelbaby
    "he tries" is that it?
  • TasselLady angelbaby 2012/07/12 22:01:40
    TasselLady
    +1
    He started out trying to help the little guy. Nobody who gets into office is going to give a damn about the American people. Everybody needs to wake up and realize that this government will never rule by the people anymore. This country has to stop whining and stand up to the entire government, not just Obama if they want change. I don't see anybody doing that. They're just whining and crying.
  • drdos1943 TasselLady 2012/07/20 01:30:10
    drdos1943
    +1
    You got that one right.
  • drdos1943 TasselLady 2012/07/20 01:29:12
    drdos1943
    +1
    Then, according to you, George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Herbert Hoover, Franklin Roosevelt, Jon Kennedy, (just to name a few) were too wealthy to be president as well.
  • TasselLady drdos1943 2012/07/21 13:39:23
    TasselLady
    Not if they actually cared about the American people. Those who are rich and only care about THEMSELVES are the ones I'm talking about. Many wealthy people have no concept of what we poor people go through. Too bad they couldn't live like us for a while so they can see how difficult it is.
  • drdos1943 TasselLady 2012/07/22 13:20:58
    drdos1943
    +2
    However, there are wealthy people who do care because of their philanthropic and moral ethic. Then there are wealthy people who care because they struggled and worked hard from humble beginnings to achieve their wealth....and there is nowhere on earth besides this country where the opportunities still exist to do so. I know... because I am one of the latter.Those same opportunities, albeit more restrictive than they used to be, are still available.
  • TasselLady drdos1943 2012/07/22 13:24:38
    TasselLady
    +1
    That's good that you are. But unfortunately in politics it's usually just the opposite.
  • drdos1943 TasselLady 2012/07/22 19:19:25
    drdos1943
    +1
    Agreed on that point. That is why all politicians must have term limits and they cannot be allowed to have the perks that they have voted for themselves, without the will of the people, for life for serving one term. That is no less than obscene.

News & Politics

2013/06/20 00:53:10

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals