Is Rand Paul angling for Romney VP??!!
BlueRepublican
2012/06/09 16:35:11
|
|
|||||
|
12 votes
|
|
34% | ||
|
5 votes
|
|
14% | ||
|
13 votes
|
|
37% | ||
|
5 votes
|
|
14% | ||
Tea Party-beloved KY Senator Rand Paul, (Ron Paul's son btw) has endorsed Mitt Romney as Republican Presidential nominee. His support and effort was first to his father's campaign, but now goes to the Romney camp.
If Romney chooses Rand Paul as VP, it would seem logical. He would in a single swoop unite the Libertarians, Southern Conservatives and Tea Party leaders around him, without an overshadowing presence like a Chris Christie for example.
So is Rand Paul angling to become the Romney VP or just falling in line with the presumptive nominee? Let me know what you think?
Vote now, comment, share with all your friends and RAVE!!!
SOUND OFF AMERICA!!!
If Romney chooses Rand Paul as VP, it would seem logical. He would in a single swoop unite the Libertarians, Southern Conservatives and Tea Party leaders around him, without an overshadowing presence like a Chris Christie for example.
So is Rand Paul angling to become the Romney VP or just falling in line with the presumptive nominee? Let me know what you think?
Vote now, comment, share with all your friends and RAVE!!!
SOUND OFF AMERICA!!!
Read More: http://communities.washingtontimes.com/neighborhoo...
Top Opinion
-
Undecided
+3In a general way, this is the problem with hero worship, in this case Ron Paul and his son Rand. Finding a savior is not the way to go. It seems that the TEA party has got it right, they have set up many local organizations and realize that it must be from the bottom up. Developing control at the local and state levels is as important or more so than the President or VP.
No matter who the VP may be ... mr. magic underwear will never be president.
"Paul’s plan would: cut the average Social Security recipient’s benefits by nearly 40 percent, reduce defense spending by nearly $100 billion below a level the Pentagon calls “devastating,” and end the current Medicare program in two years — even for current recipients, according to the Senate Budget Committee staff. It would eliminate the education, energy, housing and commerce departments, decimate homeland security, eviscerate programs for the poor, and give the wealthy a bonanza by reducing tax rates to 17 percent and eliminating taxes on capital gains and dividends." - http://blogs.detroitnews.com/...