Quantcast

Is Obama nuts or is this treason?

midwife 2010/06/19 12:27:38
You!
Add Photos & Videos
Yes, you have heard and read it correctly. The Obama Administration is preparing to challenge SB 1070 in court. Oddly, the word slipped its way into the mainstream media very passively via Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton who was meeting with South American officials to discuss tensions in the region over last year's Honduran coup and concerns with Iran and the Middle East.
The contention however is not what many would think. The Obama Administration has been bound and determined to challenge the law from the onset; literally before even reading it. The challenge is not based upon issues of constitutionality; it is based upon President Obama wanting absolute control.
"President Obama has spoken out against the law because he thinks that the federal government should be determining immigration policy. And the Justice Department, under his direction, will be bringing a lawsuit against the act." Clinton stated.

Well now, that’s not entirely true now is it? President Obama used words like “unconstitutional,” “racial profiling,” “misguided” and “civil rights violations” in his references to the law, not that immigration was to be solely enforced by the federal government. After his handlers have read the legislation, their tune has changed and now President Obama seeks to refute the legislation because it is suddenly felt that immigration enforcement laws are solely to be conducted “under his direction” more or less, by the federal government.

What is clearly proven is the constitutionality of the Arizona law. We are now witnessing, yet again President Obama’s insisting upon himself over that of the people’s wishes, desires, wants and needs.

The epic failure in immigration enforcement at the federal level is the epic failing to enforce immigration at the federal level. In spite of this well known fact, immigration reform is the targeted Obama Administration agenda item. We seek to reform only when we first fail to enforce. Though a simple concept, the federal government continually demonstrates its inept ability to enforce both before and after reform. To reform immigration and fail to enforce immigration laws only creates a larger and more complex set of problems in the future. This is why the illegal immigration problem is as severe as it is today; amnesty under President Reagan followed by inept enforcement measures. Instead of enhancing enforcement, the Obama Administration seeks reform. It likens itself to programs such as health care reform where nothing pans out the way it is described when it is being “sold” based on ideology and when the reality of the consequences come to light, they are largely ignored in hopes they will go away. The cycle must first be stopped which is what Arizona is trying to do.

Enforcement has its consequence as well. Mexican lawmakers are now angry. “How can Arizona pass a law like this?” asked Mexican Rep Leticia Amparano-Gamez, who represents Nogales. “There is not one person living in Sonora who does not have a friend or relative working in Arizona,” she said, speaking in Spanish. “Mexico is not prepared for this, for the tremendous problems it will face as more and more Mexicans working in Arizona and who were sending money to their families return to their home-towns in Sonora without jobs. We are one family, socially and economically of the people of Sonora and Arizona.” Their frustration is having to support as a nation, their own citizens and losing the advantage of having untaxed US Dollars infusing their economy at such a high exchange rate. The estimated unemployment rate in Mexico is 5.53%. Welcome to the club of world economic realities.

“This would be no different than me continually mooching off my neighbor who is economically worse off than I am because it is to my advantage to do so. What makes it worse is to think that I am have such little regard for their well being that I never once stop to consider how I am contributing to their dire straits.” said Gilbert of Sierra Vista. “If anything, we all need to pull our own weight to get through this together and be responsible for supporting our own citizens. America, through its lack of borders has invited an economic leech that is bleeding us before our very eyes. Our unemployment is nearly twice that of Mexico and we still don’t understand the importance of the issue.”

According to the Cochise County sheriff, problems associated with illegal immigration cost residents 37 cents of every tax dollar they pay. Cochise County is a border town in Arizona, and shares 84 miles of border with Mexico. The medical treatment of illegal immigrants accounts for about ten percent of the county’s health department budget.

Immigration reform does not correct such problems, enforcement however does. Until enforcement measures are fully committed to, the problem will continue to exist; it will not magically go away by ignoring the issue or by trying to justify unlawful behavior through ideological and irrational reasoning.

Read More: http://www.examiner.com/x-43033-Scottsdale-Liberta...

Add a comment above

Top Opinion

  • Jaxxi 2010/06/19 13:58:10 (edited)
    I think Arizona is...............
    Jaxxi
    +5
    strong enough to win. We here in AZ have MORE than enough provable reason for this law to stand, as we keep finding more and more Iraqi terrorists being detained, who are posing as Mexicans- God only knows how many have snuck across, not to mention the sky high rise in pedophilia and sex offenders (mostly hispanic and illegal) not to mention all of our fallen officers from drug cartel......Obama is fighting this because the Illuminati is pressuring him to create the "North American Union" with Mexico and Canada, which is part of the "New World Order" agenda, so they can kill the American dollar- Mr. Obama has already signed his approval on the new currency and they gave him a framed coin with his name on it as a token. AZ is on to it, and we won't back down and kiss their high rolling, mind controlling asses. Don't like it?..Talk to our Sheriff...... token az kiss high rolling mind controlling asses talk sheriff

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • RICK 2010/06/22 19:24:44
    comment...........
    RICK
    +1
    If the federal government did their job states wouldnt have to do it for them
  • MIKEY 2010/06/21 12:49:09
    comment...........
    MIKEY
    +1
    YO OBAMA ........SHOW ME YOUR PAPERS AS WELL....AND IF NOT GET OUT.....YOUR HATRED FOR THIS COUNTRY IS CLEAR......AND YOUR GOAL IS TO DESTROY US.......
  • santa6642 2010/06/19 21:23:05
    I think Obama is..................
    santa6642
    +1
    an empty suit and a traitor to America
  • jumpboots 187th PIR 2010/06/19 19:41:46
    comment...........
    jumpboots 187th PIR
    +1
    People of Arizona:"Stick to your guns,you have the majority of Americans standing
    with you.... Obama is a traitor and should be tried for treason along with his marxist regime.
  • rjmac7 2010/06/19 19:23:00 (edited)
    I think Arizona is...............
    rjmac7
    +1
    I think Arizona is the only State that is thinking correctly and all other states should follow their example, as well as District of Columbia who should throw out Obama as an Illegal Immigrant.
  • nightlight 2010/06/19 19:06:26
    comment...........
    nightlight
    +2
    This is just another of the already too many treasonous acts committed by Obama. WHEN WILL HE BE ARRESTED, TRIED AND HANGED?????
  • Darkitec 2010/06/19 18:40:04
    I think Arizona is...............
    Darkitec
    +1
    Completely and utterly correct in this fight. I look forward to Arizona putting the spot light on the federal governments inept lack of action at stopping this problem.
  • jimih67 2010/06/19 18:20:31
    comment...........
    jimih67
    +2
    I have one word to describe the people protesting keeping our borders secure: IDIOTS.
  • Theresa 2010/06/19 17:20:49
    I think Obama is..................
    Theresa
    +1
    The Usurper is trying to cause civil unrest by unequal treatment of citizens vs non citizens!
  • patti 2010/06/19 17:07:20
    I think Obama is..................
    patti
    +4
    Yes, Obama is nuts. There's no evidence to support any other argument.
  • luigi1-... patti 2010/06/19 17:40:52 (edited)
    luigi1- in god we trust
    +1
    There's new evidence Bush used his super top secret mind control doomsday weapon on Obama. That may explain why he's going nuts. It's Bush's fault...just ask The View & Rosie O'donnell claims to have positive proof.
  • patti luigi1-... 2010/06/19 17:48:17
    patti
    Who has one of those mind-eraser things like they used in "Men In Black?" That's what we need for Obama. OR better yet, a ray gun. Isn't that what you use to vaporize monsters from space?
  • Dude patti 2010/08/08 05:38:23
    Dude
    +2
    I don't believe for one second obama is nuts. He is evil. Every thing he is doing is done with malice of forethought. He has been preparing for this most of his life. The only part that was a surprise to him was finding the democrat party already so far down the same road. That was the free gift that allowed him to move so quickly. They are every bit as guilty as obama but only about 1/10 as smart.
  • patti Dude 2010/08/08 06:21:35
  • m 2010/06/19 16:15:16
    I think Obama is..................
    m
    +3
    Ignorant. Arizona's law mirrors the laws in many states, especially California; as well federal law. Mexico would really piss and moan if the U.S. enacted the same laws they have with regard to illegal aliens. As it is we just deport them. Mexico's police and military have been known to rob, rape, torture and murder people who are in this country illegally. I'm sick and tired of paying taxes to help support these criminals who come into this country bringing their drugs and gang lifestyle while contributing absolutely nothing!
  • chaoskitty123 2010/06/19 15:49:59
    comment...........
    chaoskitty123
    +2
    Ok, by this definition then the Oklahoma state law that Liberals said they accept where illegals face no hardship until after they break a law (excluding the fact they break laws by being here which is why they're called illegals) will have to be tossed out as well. Catch 22 if the reason is because the federal government alone should handle this... then other states with laws Liberals say they accept would lose their rights as well.

    It not only makes Liberals look like liars concerning what rights they think states should have, but most of them say that we should be doing more about illegal immigration to stop it.

    So ok, what is Obama proposing to do to stop illegal immigration then?

    Put up or shut up Obama supporters because you cannot on the one hand oppose the Arizona law while accepting the Oklahoma law and say we absolutely must do something about illegal immigration... then support Obama trying to take authority away from the states to do something about illegal immigration while doing absolutely nothing on his part to enforce or create new federal laws about illegal immigration.

    President Obama is clearly not listening to the people or even the people in his own political party. He doesn't even hear the voices of Liberals saying we must do something or that they a...











































    Ok, by this definition then the Oklahoma state law that Liberals said they accept where illegals face no hardship until after they break a law (excluding the fact they break laws by being here which is why they're called illegals) will have to be tossed out as well. Catch 22 if the reason is because the federal government alone should handle this... then other states with laws Liberals say they accept would lose their rights as well.

    It not only makes Liberals look like liars concerning what rights they think states should have, but most of them say that we should be doing more about illegal immigration to stop it.

    So ok, what is Obama proposing to do to stop illegal immigration then?

    Put up or shut up Obama supporters because you cannot on the one hand oppose the Arizona law while accepting the Oklahoma law and say we absolutely must do something about illegal immigration... then support Obama trying to take authority away from the states to do something about illegal immigration while doing absolutely nothing on his part to enforce or create new federal laws about illegal immigration.

    President Obama is clearly not listening to the people or even the people in his own political party. He doesn't even hear the voices of Liberals saying we must do something or that they approve of some state laws like the one in Oklahoma.

    As I have said, federal law supercedes state law in several areas. One of these areas actually is enforcing our nations borders against illegal immigration. The problem here is that federal authority only exists where such issues are being addressed by the federal government effectively.

    The federal government does not have authority to create laws for the explicit purpose of taking rights away from the states and then purposely not enforce those laws.

    Before any Democrat or Obama supporter chimes in against me, this began moreso under the two Bush Presidents and the Republicans than under Obama and Jan Brewer in Arizona made it very clear she faults the Bush Administration for the need to create the Arizona immigration law. What she faults Obama for is she hoped he would give her audience and speak with her about rectifying the situation and he refused to even confirm he received her correspondence with a courtesy call or email even. Because Obama refused to speak with her, she decided to support the immigration law even though she had expressed reservations about it earlier and clearly had established grounds where she hoped the new President might listen to her whereas Bush didn't... neither would Obama and so the law in Arizona was passed.

    Most people who support Obama do so blindly. No matter what he does, he's not at fault and someone else is to blame. Here, with the Arizona immigration law, he clearly is at fault because all Arizona's governor was requesting was that he meet with her to discuss illegal immigration and he would not even acknowledge her with a courtesy response which most Presidents, including Bush, almost always do. Even when Obama authorized troops and money to help Arizona, he didn't tell the Governor and she learned about it on the news like everyone else. Same thing with this issue with Hillary as we have to learn from her speaking in a foreign nation what Obama plans to do... it's ridiculous.

    The Tenth Amendment grants to the federal government all powers not explicitly granted to the states. However, when the federal government refuses to address issues or to enforce existing federal laws, these rights fall back to the states.

    The people of this country have a right to be protected and to have their issues addressed. The Governors of the states are not just figureheads albeit there have been several times in US history where the federal government became so autonomous and out of control that they tried to do away with states rights and the authority vested in the Governors to directly govern each state.

    It is supposed to be a partnership between the Governor and state legislatures with the federal government. The federal government exists to handle all issues each state has in common... thus issues like international trade, border disputes and the national economy fall to the federal government. Illegal immigration is one of those areas but again, only if the federal government is doing something about it and enforcing the laws... which even Liberals admit it is not doing.

    The Arizona immigration law was drafted and written to explicitly copy the federal laws and to grant state authorities the right to handle these matters in the exact manner the federal government is supposed to be doing it.

    Is the man who drafted the law a racist? It appears he may be... but when the political left admits we need to do something about illegal immigration and then supports doing absolutely nothing... sometimes it takes a cold hearted snake to do what must be done and this snake made sure that Arizona state law is identical to federal law.

    All the concerns Obama expressed about racial profiling and so on... these would happen if the fed's enforced federal laws so Obama cannot actually challenge the Arizona law on those grounds.

    This I have tried to explain to Liberals and they refuse to listen.

    The only way he can oppose the Arizona law is to claim that only the federal government has the right to enforce immigration laws which almost every Obama supporter on this site has admitted is not being done and most say that something must be done about illegal immigration.

    So what do they propose? Nothing... nothing but looking at the Oklahoma law and saying they would have no problem with the Arizona law if it were like the Oklahoma law.

    So here's the problem in a nutshell.

    Republican leaders like George Bush sr and George Bush jr literally stabbed their supporters in the backs opening the doors to even greater illegal immigration. Republican voters didn't make much of an issue of this not understanding what was going on. The reason is that True Conservatives are concerned about illegal immigration... but the Bush's are not True Conservatives, they are Neoconservatives whose policies mirror Liberals in regards to supporting big government, big spending and war as Liberals are proving they support war if only when Democrats are in control.

    Thus, this is not a problem created by the political left if Neocons are accepted by the political right as being rightwing Conservatives when if anything they are leftwing Conservatives or rightwing Liberals... they were not leftwingers when they were Democrats because they opposed the political left. But when they switched sides, they revealed they are not political rightwingers because they do not support True Conservative ideology.

    The culture war of the 60's reveals the truth as it was not a war between Republicans and Democrats, it was an internal war between Liberals and Neocons which the Neocons lost and switched parties. Just because they hate Socialists and Communists does not make them rightwingers anymore than a Jew who fights the KKK, Neonazi's and upholds an extreme leftwing ideological belief structure suddenly becomes a political rightwinger because they try to blow up a Muslim mosque... yet the mentality is that only a rightwing extremist would do such a thing regardless if everything they believe and do beyond that incident is leftwing in nature.

    In a nutshell, there is no controversy about this as True Conservatives will demand something be done about illegal immigration and then do something about it.... Neocons will have the exact same view expressed by Liberals that we must do something but then support doing nothing.

    To True Republicans, does this not clarify the difference between a Neocon and a True Conservative better than anything when it was two Republican Presidents, two Neocons who are most responsible for illegal immigration become far worse and federal laws not to be enforced?

    Neocons are not True Conservatives... they are RINO's and they have stolen everything True Conservatives believe from them leaving them confused and seeking what they believe because thanks to the Neocons, True Conservatives don't know what they believe anymore... but they are trying to find their roots and trying to rediscover what a True Conservative is.

    You want something done about illegal immigration?

    Conservative Republicans have to purge themselves of Neocons and True Liberals have to purge themselves of Socialists. It's just that simple.
    (more)
  • Theresa chaoski... 2010/06/19 17:29:28
    Theresa
    +1
    You use the wrong word to describe the situation in the Republican and Democrat parties the word is PROGRESSIVES! There are progressives in both parties and these are the people we need to get rid of once and for all!
  • chaoski... Theresa 2010/06/21 03:36:48
    chaoskitty123
    Was Teddy Roosevelt a Socialist or Communist? How about JD Rockefeller? Progressive Republicans are different than Progressive Democrats just as Conservative Democrats are different than Conservative Republicans. http://www.sodahead.com/unite... Here's an interesting question for you which most seem afraid of... what's the difference between a Neocon and a True Conservative... Disinter nailed it even if the other two commenters thought it was a joke. There is a huge difference between Neocons and Conservatives... they are, in fact, almost completely ideological opposites as Neocons subscribe to ideals that begin with Leon Trotsky, one of the founders of the Soviet Union. I asked the same question of Democrats to tell me the difference between a Liberal, a Socialist and a Progressive in their party... not one response.

    Do the research as Progressive Republicans were not the same as Progressive Democrats and were often called Conservative Lite because they believed in Conservative values also and while they believed in using the government to achieve their ends, they also believed when those ends were achieved that government should get the hell out. They believed in small government, low taxation, were against big spending and against war... they were in fact the ones who pushe...



    Was Teddy Roosevelt a Socialist or Communist? How about JD Rockefeller? Progressive Republicans are different than Progressive Democrats just as Conservative Democrats are different than Conservative Republicans. http://www.sodahead.com/unite... Here's an interesting question for you which most seem afraid of... what's the difference between a Neocon and a True Conservative... Disinter nailed it even if the other two commenters thought it was a joke. There is a huge difference between Neocons and Conservatives... they are, in fact, almost completely ideological opposites as Neocons subscribe to ideals that begin with Leon Trotsky, one of the founders of the Soviet Union. I asked the same question of Democrats to tell me the difference between a Liberal, a Socialist and a Progressive in their party... not one response.

    Do the research as Progressive Republicans were not the same as Progressive Democrats and were often called Conservative Lite because they believed in Conservative values also and while they believed in using the government to achieve their ends, they also believed when those ends were achieved that government should get the hell out. They believed in small government, low taxation, were against big spending and against war... they were in fact the ones who pushed issues like civil rights and womens rights far more strongly than Conservatives so that these issues were always moving forward... but unlike the left, Progressive Republicans wanted slow progress instead of radical change.

    While true, some might say Obama is pushing a Progressive agenda, it is also true that most say leftwing Progressives are Socialists and Communists which if true means my statement about him remains correct.

    But examine the Neocons more closely as most Republicans don't know anything about the ideology they subscribe to and give their blind support to... and that made it very easy for Neocons to take over because most Republicans assume Neoconservatives are still Conservatives... they are not nor have they ever been... not unless you believe the founding fathers of the Soviet Union were Conservatives.
    (more)
  • Theresa chaoski... 2010/06/21 05:21:51
    Theresa
    +1
    No a progressive is a progressive depending on the party the goal is the same! The only difference between a Progressive Republican and a Progressive Democrat is the rate of change. However they are both going in the same direction and will end at the same place!
  • midwife chaoski... 2010/06/20 12:03:17
    midwife
    +1
    Obama hasn't listened to the people from day one.
  • chaoski... midwife 2010/06/21 03:25:44
    chaoskitty123
    +1
    Sure he has... it's that whistling sound going in one ear and out the other he's always complaining about ;P
  • Wolf 2010/06/19 15:47:38
    comment...........
    Wolf
    +2
    He is a communist who is building his base of dependent slaves. Look at the public sector that is milking the US Taxpaxyers for over $2.2 Trillion a year and is the root cause of the debt issues throughout this nation. A government that is 30% bigger than it should be and extracts 70% more benefits for themselves than is equitable. This is a robbery of US wealth by the politicians and the taxpayers are too stupid to realize it until it is too late. The public sector participants do not understand this free gravy train cannot continue see Greece for the model.
  • ALLEYCAT 2010/06/19 14:54:33
    I think Arizona is...............
    ALLEYCAT
    +2
    Doing exactly what every boarder state should be doing. Hell every state in the union owes it to the citizens of that state to see to it that that state is as free of illegal aliens as it can be. This Gamez bimbo in Sonora is the freaking nut. Thinking that we here in the states have a responsibility to support a Mexican city just because Arizona is over run by illegals who are sending money home to their families. Why do they send the money, because Mexico does not and will not give the people of Sonora any welfare support. Why take money out of the pockets of rich Mexicans when you can let the STUPID ASS AMERICANS do it for you. At first I had some compassion for the plight of these illegals. Then After learning of the problems they caused for us I felt that something had to be done to see that they paid some form of fair tax to our country. Now that I see that Obama wants to legalize them to create a massive voting bloc for the Democrats, and Mexico is using hard working Americans as their own welfare department Via the money sent home by illegals. My thoughts have reach the point that I would not care an iota if the border Patrol gunned down every one of the bastards invading my country. If the government doesn't want to do that then let us invade Mexico and take all the l...
    Doing exactly what every boarder state should be doing. Hell every state in the union owes it to the citizens of that state to see to it that that state is as free of illegal aliens as it can be. This Gamez bimbo in Sonora is the freaking nut. Thinking that we here in the states have a responsibility to support a Mexican city just because Arizona is over run by illegals who are sending money home to their families. Why do they send the money, because Mexico does not and will not give the people of Sonora any welfare support. Why take money out of the pockets of rich Mexicans when you can let the STUPID ASS AMERICANS do it for you. At first I had some compassion for the plight of these illegals. Then After learning of the problems they caused for us I felt that something had to be done to see that they paid some form of fair tax to our country. Now that I see that Obama wants to legalize them to create a massive voting bloc for the Democrats, and Mexico is using hard working Americans as their own welfare department Via the money sent home by illegals. My thoughts have reach the point that I would not care an iota if the border Patrol gunned down every one of the bastards invading my country. If the government doesn't want to do that then let us invade Mexico and take all the land up to 50 miles below the border and create a no mans land that would give the space we need to stop the illegals before they could reach any U.S. cities. Hell it not like we haven't paid for the 50 miles of land already.
    (more)
  • midwife ALLEYCAT 2010/06/20 12:06:58
    midwife
    +1
    In Sonora lawmakers are up in arms...what are they going to do with all these Mexican people coming home? This is an outrage! LOL Well maybe Gamez would like to review the Mexican Immigration law. Personally I think we should adopt that one.
  • who? 2010/06/19 14:44:58
    comment...........
    who?
  • midwife who? 2010/06/20 12:09:50
    midwife
    Nice video but I'm missing the point.
  • Mel 2010/06/19 14:32:50
    I think Obama is..................
    Mel
    +2
    Obama is nuts and it is treason. And he was born in Kenya and should not be president, anyway. There is nothing wrong with Arizona law. It is constitutional.
  • Old Soldier 2010/06/19 13:59:46
    comment...........
    Old Soldier
    +4
    Obama is a certified fruit cake. Then,,,,,and now, and his follows aren't that far behind him in that area.
  • midwife Old Sol... 2010/06/20 12:10:28
    midwife
    Funny thing is...he's losing followers. Maybe the kool-aid is wearing off.
  • Old Sol... midwife 2010/06/20 15:16:51
    Old Soldier
    True, but we still see the hardcores here on SodaHead, and there are many we don't see out in the world.
  • midwife Old Sol... 2010/06/20 23:39:58
    midwife
    I know, right. It still amazes me how strong that Kool-aid is. I try to understand their thought process but it baffles me. How can a person with any intelligence at all have absolutely no common sense or logic? It really does amaze me. I've tried to do it but I can't. Maybe it's harder than I think.
  • Old Sol... midwife 2010/06/21 03:22:55
    Old Soldier
    People that are on wellfare are very hard to convince that it isn't free. Take it from there, and you will soon understand the thought process.
  • midwife Old Sol... 2010/06/21 03:58:46
    midwife
    OOOOhhhhh yes and let me give you an example of something that makes my tongue bloody. A patient comes in for her new OB visit. she's Medicaid, and I'm explaining about the optional blood tests you can do, yada yada yada. Before I'm half finished with the explanation, she wants to know if medicaid covers it? Quote, unquote...If it's covered I want everything.

    I still don't understand the concept of thinking you are entitled to anything and can just sit on you a-$$ and expect handouts.
  • Old Sol... midwife 2010/06/21 04:09:17
    Old Soldier
    Some of us would starve to death before using wellfare. Of course, that is the ones that know that God would never let that happen.
  • midwife Old Sol... 2010/06/21 10:03:54
    midwife
    yep
  • Old Sol... midwife 2010/06/21 23:40:38
    Old Soldier
    I may have been to coarse wit my reply, above, perhaps I should explain. I feel that welfare is a leash, and once the collar is on, it is very hard to get rid of.
  • midwife Old Sol... 2010/06/22 03:28:01
    midwife
    It's an addiction.
  • Old Sol... midwife 2010/06/22 12:38:19
    Old Soldier
    That sounds about right. I have known people that worked who were on it, and it kept them from doing their best, though they never realized it.
  • Jaxxi 2010/06/19 13:58:10 (edited)
    I think Arizona is...............
    Jaxxi
    +5
    strong enough to win. We here in AZ have MORE than enough provable reason for this law to stand, as we keep finding more and more Iraqi terrorists being detained, who are posing as Mexicans- God only knows how many have snuck across, not to mention the sky high rise in pedophilia and sex offenders (mostly hispanic and illegal) not to mention all of our fallen officers from drug cartel......Obama is fighting this because the Illuminati is pressuring him to create the "North American Union" with Mexico and Canada, which is part of the "New World Order" agenda, so they can kill the American dollar- Mr. Obama has already signed his approval on the new currency and they gave him a framed coin with his name on it as a token. AZ is on to it, and we won't back down and kiss their high rolling, mind controlling asses. Don't like it?..Talk to our Sheriff...... token az kiss high rolling mind controlling asses talk sheriff
  • midwife Jaxxi 2010/06/20 12:11:54
    midwife
    Gotta love Sheriff Joe. I'd vote for him.

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2014/12/19 22:46:04

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals