IS OBAMA CARE THE INSTRUMENT OF A “666” IMPLANT THAT WAS WARNED ABOUT IN THE BIBLE?
|
|
|||||
|
71 votes
|
|
45% | ||
|
35 votes
|
|
22% | ||
|
25 votes
|
|
16% | ||
|
27 votes
|
|
17% | ||
The New Health Care (Obamacare) law H.R.
3590 Also HR 4872 requires all US citizens to have the RIFD (Radio Implantable
Frequency Device) chip implanted into all of us by March 23, 2013. Such a chip will not only include our medical
history, but personal information to include our bank account, social security…
as well as tracking capability by GPS monitoring? According to page 1004 of obamacare, it will
be the “Law of the Land!”
For those of you who do not believe this,
READ THE BILL!
National Medical Device Registry from H.R. 3200
[Healthcare Bill], pages 1001-1008:
(g)(1) The Secretary shall establish a national medical device registry (in
this subsection referred to as the ‘registry’) to facilitate analysis of postmarket
safety and outcomes data on each device that— ‘‘(A) is or has been used in or
on a patient; ‘‘(B)and is— ‘‘(i) a class III device; or ‘‘(ii) a class II
device that is implantable, life-supporting, or life-sustaining.”
Then on page 1004 it describes what the term “data” means in paragraph 1,
section B:
‘‘(2) In this paragraph, the term ‘data’ refers to information respecting a
device described in paragraph (1), including claims data, patient survey data,
standardized analytic files that allow for the pooling and analysis of data
from disparate data environments, electronic health records, and any other data
deemed appropriate by the Secretary”
What exactly is a class II device that is implantable? Approved by the FDA, a
class II implantable device is an “implantable radio frequency transponder
system for patient identification and health information.” The purpose of a
class II device is to collect data in medical patients such as “claims data,
patient survey data, standardized analytic files that allow for the pooling and
analysis of data from disparate data environments, electronic health records,
and any other data deemed appropriate by the Secretary.”
Rev. 13: 17…..
“And that no
man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or
the number of his name.” (18) …. “Here is wisdom. Let him that hath
understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and
his number [is] Six hundred threescore [and] six.”
PS: Thank you PEARLIE MOMI for this
information.
Read More: http://www.christian-forum.net/index.php?showtopic...
Top Opinion
-
NO WONDER PELOSI SAID WE NEEDED TO PASS THE BILL TO SEE WHAT WAS IN IT!
+13No Chip for me. I am not a criminal. If I say No, I will probably go to the Fema camps.....The Law of the Land.....OMG....Vote Obama out~~ and repeal repeal the Heath care bill.. Thanks OS
ROF...
Sounds like O, but it really was this guy...
NBC...the year 2007.......
they up held it ...???
so why would many states be suing the govt ( IDAHO ) included because of these & many more provisions .....
First of all you claim that HR4872 requires that all US citizens must have an rifd implant that will also include personal information along with GPS tracking capability, that is in fact a bold face lie.
In your question you say this requirement is in HR 4872, but then you cite HR 3200 which never passed to support your claim? Don't you see the obvious flaw in this disingenuous scare tactic you're promoting here?
The rifd implant cited in HR 3200 was removed due to the hysterical claims from the conservatives trying to scare the US population into rejecting the ACA healthcare bill through these sleazy fear tactics.
In the version that did not pass: HR3200, there was a provision about using rifd implants ONLY in the people who have an implanted medical device such as a pacemaker or an insulin pump so that the dept. of Health and Human services could track the success rate of the implants along with keeping track of potential recalls of such implanted medical devices.
No where in the first draft: HR 3200 ( Which did not pass by the way!) did it say that "EVERYONE" is required to have one let alone that the rifd chip have GPS tracking capability along with ones financial records,
Its just another sleazy scare tactic from those who oppose the ACA healthcare law that was debunked long ago.
Why Barack Obama's Social Security card application might have included a Connecticut mailing address is something of a curiosity, as he had no known connection to that state at the time, but by itself that quirk is no indicator of fraud. The most likely explanation for the discrepancy is a simple clerical or typographical error: the ZIP code in the area of Honolulu where Barack Obama lived is 96814, while the ZIP code for Danbury, Connecticut, is 06814. Since '0' and '9' are similarly shaped numbers and are adjacent on typewriter keyboards, it's not uncommon for handwritten examples to be mistaken for each other, or for one to be mistyped as the other (thereby potentially resulting in a Hawaiian resident's application mistakenly being routed as if it had originated from Connecticut).
Anyway prior to 1972, cards were issued in local Social Security offices around the country and the Area Number (the first three digits of an SSN) represented the State in which the card was issued. This did not necessarily have to be the State where the applicant lived, since a person could apply for their card in any Social Security office. Since 1972, when SSA began assigning SSNs and issuing cards centrally from Baltimore, the area number assigned has been based on the ZIP code in the...
Why Barack Obama's Social Security card application might have included a Connecticut mailing address is something of a curiosity, as he had no known connection to that state at the time, but by itself that quirk is no indicator of fraud. The most likely explanation for the discrepancy is a simple clerical or typographical error: the ZIP code in the area of Honolulu where Barack Obama lived is 96814, while the ZIP code for Danbury, Connecticut, is 06814. Since '0' and '9' are similarly shaped numbers and are adjacent on typewriter keyboards, it's not uncommon for handwritten examples to be mistaken for each other, or for one to be mistyped as the other (thereby potentially resulting in a Hawaiian resident's application mistakenly being routed as if it had originated from Connecticut).
Anyway prior to 1972, cards were issued in local Social Security offices around the country and the Area Number (the first three digits of an SSN) represented the State in which the card was issued. This did not necessarily have to be the State where the applicant lived, since a person could apply for their card in any Social Security office. Since 1972, when SSA began assigning SSNs and issuing cards centrally from Baltimore, the area number assigned has been based on the ZIP code in the mailing address provided on the application for the original Social Security card. The applicant's mailing address does not have to be the same as their place of residence. Thus, the Area Number does not necessarily represent the State of residence of the applicant, either prior to 1972 or since.
First of all... Soda Head is intended to be a forum for discussion, your attacks as being "sleazy" are not warranted nor are they meaningful as a means of civil debate. Your emotions have no place in this discussion should you wish to continue!
Yes, you are correct, that HR 3200 did not come up for a vote. For there was indeed language in that bill that was offensive to many that a "individual" class II chip would be installed to the human body! As I'm quite sure you already know, such devices are common in animals already for location or other pertinent records. Also, they have been installed in credit cards as well as other tracking devises of cell phones and automobiles! But it is indeed plain to see that attempts were made to install such devices into human beings. The very FIRST to any "mandated" implementation is a voluntary one, is it not!
So here is the bottom line. Although HR3200 never made it to a vote, Reconciliation bill HR 4872 did! Even SNOPES declares, or did, that NONE of the language of the RFID Microchip made it the passed bill.... but it did! And in that bill, I w...
First of all... Soda Head is intended to be a forum for discussion, your attacks as being "sleazy" are not warranted nor are they meaningful as a means of civil debate. Your emotions have no place in this discussion should you wish to continue!
Yes, you are correct, that HR 3200 did not come up for a vote. For there was indeed language in that bill that was offensive to many that a "individual" class II chip would be installed to the human body! As I'm quite sure you already know, such devices are common in animals already for location or other pertinent records. Also, they have been installed in credit cards as well as other tracking devises of cell phones and automobiles! But it is indeed plain to see that attempts were made to install such devices into human beings. The very FIRST to any "mandated" implementation is a voluntary one, is it not!
So here is the bottom line. Although HR3200 never made it to a vote, Reconciliation bill HR 4872 did! Even SNOPES declares, or did, that NONE of the language of the RFID Microchip made it the passed bill.... but it did! And in that bill, I will post it at the end, it DOES indeed give vast power for the Secretary of Health and Human Services, Kathleen Sebelius, many powers of AUTHORITY in the implementation of these chips!
HR 4872, Page 1019.....
1 ‘‘(5) To carry out this subsection, there are author2
ized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary
3 for fiscal years 2010 and 2011.’’.
4 (2) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The Secretary of
5 Health and Human Services shall establish and
6 begin implementation of the registry under section
7 519(g) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
8 Act, as added by paragraph (1), by not later than
9 the date that is 36 months after the date of the en10
actment of this Act, without regard to whether or
11 not final regulations to establish and operate the
12 registry have been promulgated by such date.
13 (3) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section
14 303(f)(1)(B)(ii) of the Federal Food, Drug, and
15 Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 333(f)(1)(B)(ii)) is amend16
ed by striking ‘‘519(g)’’ and inserting ‘‘519(h)’’.
17 (b) ELECTRONIC EXCHANGE AND USE IN CERTIFIED
18 ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS OF UNIQUE DEVICE
19 IDENTIFIERS.—
It may be worth your time to read "What's in the Bill" and so note the power that it has in the authority of those who were NEVER voted into office!
I do believe you will agree.... this bill was FORCED upon us and our Congressmen without ANY input or allowance to read the bill before signing! I believe Nancy Pelosi's words will echo in the halls of Congressional History as being the most "Blatent Words" ever spoken to promote an agenda of the very few, that will affect the lives of so many! "We have to pass the bill in order to know what is in it!" :(
Finally, as EVERYONE will so note, we are finding more and more things in the 2400 plus pages that are worrying Americans everyday even though more than a YEAR has passed since the passage on obamacare!
Any document that is written with such length and by so many Washington Lawyers and powerful people in govt MUST be taken seriously as a means of controlling our lives and not, in so many cases, trying to do "GOOD" for us! Would you not agree? Or are you willing to say George Bush did well to form up the Patriot Act? Which I feel is an invasion of my privacy as well!
Here is the link to HR: 4872.... I believe the CHIP information starts at the bottom of page 1013! Old Salt
http://housedocs.house.gov/ru...
I wondered if you were going to respond to my comment about your post that was factually incorrect and wildly speculative. And I merely called the rumor that you are spreading a sleazy tactic which it is, I did not attack you personally except to ask you how gullible you were for repeating it here using an incorrect source ( HR3200)
And after reading the relevant portion from the link that you provided (Thanks by the way.) It served to reaffirm my main point about it not supporting your hysterical assertion. (Based on pages 1013 thru 1020) In fact it supported my point about its original intent to monitor implants like pace makers and insulin pumps to track their effectiveness and for recall purposes. and not require all citizens get an implant which is wildly speculative rhetoric that's simply not supported by the facts.
"Other data that the secretary deems necessary to permit post market assessments of implanted (Pace makers/insulin pumps, etc, etc.) for safety and effectiveness.... and other data deemed appropriate by the secretary to protect the public health."
Your assertion about this part is wildly speculative bordering on paranoid and being used unfairly to turn public opinion away fro...
I wondered if you were going to respond to my comment about your post that was factually incorrect and wildly speculative. And I merely called the rumor that you are spreading a sleazy tactic which it is, I did not attack you personally except to ask you how gullible you were for repeating it here using an incorrect source ( HR3200)
And after reading the relevant portion from the link that you provided (Thanks by the way.) It served to reaffirm my main point about it not supporting your hysterical assertion. (Based on pages 1013 thru 1020) In fact it supported my point about its original intent to monitor implants like pace makers and insulin pumps to track their effectiveness and for recall purposes. and not require all citizens get an implant which is wildly speculative rhetoric that's simply not supported by the facts.
"Other data that the secretary deems necessary to permit post market assessments of implanted (Pace makers/insulin pumps, etc, etc.) for safety and effectiveness.... and other data deemed appropriate by the secretary to protect the public health."
Your assertion about this part is wildly speculative bordering on paranoid and being used unfairly to turn public opinion away from the ACA law, There have been these type "big brother rumors" about rifd chips ever since they were invented and this one is on steroids. If I overlooked a portion that supports your claim then please point it out and I'll take another look at it.
I even looked at page 1004 where you claimed that it's in the law that it "requires all US citizens to have the RIFD (Radio Implantable Frequency Device) chip implanted into all of us by March 23, 2013. Such a chip will not only include our medical history, but personal information to include our bank account, social security…as well as tracking capability by GPS monitoring? According to page 1004 of obamacare, it will be the “Law of the Land!”
It did not say anything even remotely close to this nonsense that you're repeating here, once again if I overlooked it please show me where and I will retract my comment calling it a sleazy scare tactic.
I am more than willing to civilly debate this issue but I'm usually attacked by emotion based replies rather than factually based responses so I welcome an honest discussion on this matter. But I'm getting a little long winded here so say the word and I'll address the other portion of your reply should you want to continue to discuss the merits of this issue.
Oh well I guess that's a lot easier than actually trying to refute my comment with a fact based reply...just sayin...
hmmmmmm....who is the little old person? Nanas come in all ages and some of us are younger and more alert that others. We also still have our vision and our hearing. Maybe yours is impaired due to lack of oxygen, you should pull your head every once in a while for some fresh air......just sayin....
Just maybe if you would have responded to me with a fact based reply rather than an insult we could have an honest debate on the merits of this post?
But we both know you don't want any part of that now don't we? just sayin...
If you actually read it please post where it contains whats listed in this law complete with a page number like old salt did...but we both know you won't or more accurately you can't!
Take care:)
My point exactly L.....OS has already posted so why should I have to repeat it? That is illogical liberal thinking which is why you are a useful tool...you don't get it the first time....not gonna waste key strokes on you.
Have a good day. :)
Thanks for making this your last reply to me, its been a pleasure as always...