Is Obama being himself? Hypocritical!!
mac9
2012/07/15 17:04:48
Obama and his campaign is making a big deal over Romney's association with Bain Capital and yes even lies. Go figure.
Obama’s Hypocrisy: Took Money From Bain
Barack
Obama and his campaign have been making Mitt Romney’s time at Bain
Capital one of their premiere mantras that have over and over backfired
in their faces. They decided to attack the fact that Bain outsourced
jobs during the restructuring of the companies they acquired. So what
does Obama have to do with it? During the time he points to, 1999-2002,
the executives of Bain donated to Obama for his campaign. No doubt at
that time Barack Obama was not at all upset about jobs being outsourced
as he got some big, fat checks from the executives.
Ben Shapiro points out,
The
same SEC form from February 2001 that lists Mitt Romney as “sole
shareholder, sole director, Chief Executive Officer and President of
Bain Capital … the controlling person of Bain Capital” also lists over a
dozen other managing directors of Bain Capital, Inc. — all of whom were
undoubtedly more active than Romney was during this period. And
President Obama took money from many of them.
Take Joshua
Bekenstein. Bekenstein has been a managing director of Bain Capital
since 1986. In 2008, he signed Barack Obama a $4,600 check. In 2004, he
gave a $50,000 donation to the Democratic National Committee. That’s
outsourcing money, plain and simple. And Obama was happy to take it.
Or how about Stephen Pagliuca? Last year, he cut a $35,800 check to
Barack Obama’s Victory Fund. Then he cut another $30,800 check to the
DNC. And another $30,800 check to the DCCC. Jonathan Lavine and Mark
Nunnelly have both maxed out to Obama already, as well as to the DNC.
Lavin was a bundler for Obama, and raised over $100,000 for him. Michael
Krupka gave Obama $4,600 in 2008.
Now there is nothing wrong
with outsourcing jobs. There is nothing wrong with taking campaign
contributions from businesses. The problem comes when one wants to bash
his opponent over being in a company that did something you claim is bad
and then took money from the very same people. In this case Barack
Obama was fine with outsourcing while getting a check, but not fine when
it becomes a political advantage.
Obama’s Hypocrisy: Took Money From Bain
Barack
Obama and his campaign have been making Mitt Romney’s time at Bain
Capital one of their premiere mantras that have over and over backfired
in their faces. They decided to attack the fact that Bain outsourced
jobs during the restructuring of the companies they acquired. So what
does Obama have to do with it? During the time he points to, 1999-2002,
the executives of Bain donated to Obama for his campaign. No doubt at
that time Barack Obama was not at all upset about jobs being outsourced
as he got some big, fat checks from the executives.
Ben Shapiro points out,
The
same SEC form from February 2001 that lists Mitt Romney as “sole
shareholder, sole director, Chief Executive Officer and President of
Bain Capital … the controlling person of Bain Capital” also lists over a
dozen other managing directors of Bain Capital, Inc. — all of whom were
undoubtedly more active than Romney was during this period. And
President Obama took money from many of them.
Take Joshua
Bekenstein. Bekenstein has been a managing director of Bain Capital
since 1986. In 2008, he signed Barack Obama a $4,600 check. In 2004, he
gave a $50,000 donation to the Democratic National Committee. That’s
outsourcing money, plain and simple. And Obama was happy to take it.
Or how about Stephen Pagliuca? Last year, he cut a $35,800 check to
Barack Obama’s Victory Fund. Then he cut another $30,800 check to the
DNC. And another $30,800 check to the DCCC. Jonathan Lavine and Mark
Nunnelly have both maxed out to Obama already, as well as to the DNC.
Lavin was a bundler for Obama, and raised over $100,000 for him. Michael
Krupka gave Obama $4,600 in 2008.
Now there is nothing wrong
with outsourcing jobs. There is nothing wrong with taking campaign
contributions from businesses. The problem comes when one wants to bash
his opponent over being in a company that did something you claim is bad
and then took money from the very same people. In this case Barack
Obama was fine with outsourcing while getting a check, but not fine when
it becomes a political advantage.
Sort By
- davyd god loving patriot 2012/07/15 17:25:47Obama is blowing smoke diverting attention from failureI've read that nobama blames the American people for his nazi failures, "people don't want to believe the politicians can fix everything" is this code for communism or socialism or nazism ? Wake up America this man is no potus maybe a czar, he wants to murder America and he can't in one term and this is why he wants a second termreply
- mk, Smartass Oracle 2012/07/15 17:23:53It is what we come to expect from ObamaOBonzo is a serial liar
reply














