Add a comment above
Top Opinion
-
Temlakos~POTL~PWCM~JLA~☆ 2012/06/12 13:02:46Yes.+14He has shown no limit beyond which he would take the government, if Congress and the courts would let him. He has surrounded himself with those who look for a future of Five Year Plans, input-output analysis, and all news coming from a new Department of Information. (And I do not mean "information technology.")






















If you look at the rest of government led waste and corruption it is very easy - you vote all Dems out. Getting rid of the Chris Dodd's, Bawwnney Fwanks, barak obama (while corrupt Senator), Chuckie Schumer and the rest of the imbecile, nation destroying, wasteful Dimwits will go a long way towards restoring some sanity.
After all, why was Reagan seen as a "spender"? Look up who controlled the House the eight years of his presidency and then get back to me.
I knew we'd find common ground, eventually. Thank you for making a valid point - ALL DEMS need to f*ing GO!
JustTheFacts
The problem with people like you is that you think higher education either has no value or is a tool for liberal indoctrination. It makes you look ignorant.
The only problem is that my previous response is all I currently see on this page, and you have no specific arguments to debate - that's what makes you a liberal. You can't debate any situation.
Since you think you're so damn smart, why don't you announce a condition in our nation today, state your opinion on it (based on facts if you can do that) and step outside of your jock strap to take a position on something?
Ready...GO!
YOU are the one that said I didn't bring any facts into any debate. YOU are the one who said I didn't understand what facts were in general. That's on YOU to prove your accusation.
Now... specifically... what have I presented as fact in any past debate? Any. I'll take whatever you've got if, for the sake of argument, we're presuming that you're not just talking out of your ass.
Those, are the facts.
Review the post below that I posed to you and you couldn't address it. In other words - don't run and cry like a whiny little baby liberal for once. Answer the fing question!!!!! Ready...GO!
"And why should the wealthy pay LESS when they make MORE? That's ridiculous.
The top 1% already pay 60% of ALL taxes. Why should they pay that amount? Why not 30 or 40%?
An even better question is how does this horrible president feel that they should pay even more without explaining why they should?
Why shouldn't lower income Americans pay SOMETHING?"
You made the accusations. Put up or shut up. Can you support your own accusations or not?
EDIT: Nice post-and-block you coward. You can't support your own accusations, so you block.
You....are a moron. Sit down in the corner and shut up. Realize how much of a disaster your attitude is and then maybe someone will care what you say.
JustTheFacts
It sure doesn't take long to show you how wrong you are and how little you know what you are talking about.
Saying taxes only benefit those who do not pay taxes is something your going to have to work through to understand it.
You do have a point in a way with the way the current tax system is structured. We could correct that if everyone who made money contributed and the wealthy paid less, but that is not the mindset of the people, like you, who want to destroy the nation instead of make it fair for everyone.
It goes to a lot more than that. It goes to fund programs you may or may not agree with. That's the nature of taxes. And those roads benefit everyone else, too, not just you.
"Saying taxes only benefit those who do not pay taxes is something your going to have to work through to understand it. "
But I didn't say that. I said that taxes benefit everyone.
"We could correct that if everyone who made money contributed and the wealthy paid less"
And why should the wealthy pay LESS when they make MORE? That's ridiculous.
The top 1% already pay 60% of ALL taxes. Why should they pay that amount? Why not 30 or 40%?
An even better question is how does this horrible president feel that they should pay even more without explaining why they should?
Why shouldn't lower income Americans pay SOMETHING?
Analogies were never your bag were they?