Is obama a one term president?

by American eagle Posted 2011/03/22 05:11:10

More polls by American eagle

MrNight... to Belile 2011/03/22 20:08:06

+1
Obamanov may want to do that...the big reason for his total ban on guns that he wants, but it will never happen...HE is toast and once Congress gets through with his eligiblity...Bye, Bye Obamanov...probably life in Leavenworth!!

reply
lil2fluffy to MrNight... 2011/03/23 03:50:41

Boy you guys can't fall on anything but your guns and abortion, it doesn't take anyone but an idiot to see that you probably not even smart enough to own a gun.
We will be watching for you

reply
dispatcher to Belile 2011/03/22 20:20:03

+1
NEVER !!! HE WILL BE PACKING HIS BAGS & VACATING OUR WHITE HOUSE IN 2012 THAT IS FOR SURE !!!

reply
Belile to dispatcher 2011/03/22 20:22:39

+1
Only if we force him out!

reply
dispatcher to Belile 2011/03/22 20:24:46

+1
DON'T WORRY COME 2012 THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WILL HAVE AWAKEN FROM THEIR NAP & ONCE AGAIN , AMERICA WILL RISE UP !!!

reply
rdaddy 2011/03/22 19:54:25

+1
I sincerely hope so for the sake of this once great country. Another 4 years and there's no coming back in my lifetime.

reply
Jack's Pearl 2011/03/22 19:54:06

I doubt it.

reply
Noah Vaile 2011/03/22 19:53:28

Let's hope he's a three year prezident.

reply
Bob DiN to Noah Vaile 2011/03/23 01:43:00

God forbid, that would be a fate worse than death.

reply
Swany 2011/03/22 19:53:24 (edited)

+1
If Jon Huntsman runs in 2012 the puppet masters have decided to replace their front man. Otherwise they will leave Berry as president.

reply
Joyfullymeallen 2011/03/22 19:52:57

unfortunately ... he had one.

reply
BishopDeNeumoustier 2011/03/22 19:52:06

+1
Just like Jimmy Carter.

reply
Ed 2011/03/22 19:51:02

+1
I hope so.

reply
nightm4825 In god we trust 2011/03/22 19:50:59

+1
lets pray he is or get ready to start flying a chines flag over the whitehouse...

reply
Tobe 2011/03/22 19:50:37

+1
Definately

reply
Son_Of_Anubis 2011/03/22 19:50:37
Centurion~PWCM~JLA 2011/03/22 19:50:31

+1
I'd rather that he be a less than 3/4 term (I refuse to use the "P" word for him)

Settle for "less than 3/4 term usurper." Hopefully, it will be his own treasonous party which throws him out on his arse!

reply
Billyk75 2011/03/22 19:50:27

+1
I sure hope so.

reply
Nika 2011/03/22 19:49:43

+1
We'll just have to wait and see.

reply
tooner259 2011/03/22 19:48:51

+1
or less,if we`re lucky............

reply
Hughmaster3 2011/03/22 19:48:13

+1
i believe he is and i really hope so.

reply
gfreeman BN-0 2011/03/22 19:47:49

+1
Possibly. This country doesn't like moderate Republicans very much anymore.

reply
lil2fluffy to gfreema... 2011/03/23 03:53:52

Where do you see a moderate in the Republican party????
Money money money!!!!!!

reply
Mopeder 2011/03/22 19:46:24

+1
I do believe so. He has even said he may just be a one-termer.

reply
Abby 2011/03/22 19:41:41

+1
i hope he is because i dont like him.

reply
Eastexn25 2011/03/22 19:09:09

+2
Hopefully not!! Any President that would invade a Country for such trivial matters that are more routine in the Arab world as to be considered just a normal day and skirt American law while invading that Country should immediately have impeachment proceeding brought against him. So I do not see him even making his first term to completion. Guess that is why Obama picked Biden as his VP choice. Impeachment insurance.

reply
Centuri... to Eastexn25 2011/03/22 19:52:51

World Court wants Qadaffi to stand charges at The Hague.

Democrats seem willing to have American Troops subject to such.

I would not mind seeing this incident putting obama in front of the bench at The Hague.

reply
thegalnextdoor 2011/03/22 19:05:28

+1
I sure hope so... and not that he moves on to some world position.

reply
Mtnsweety 2011/03/22 18:52:34

+1
Hope so!!!

reply
Andrew 2011/03/22 18:47:23 (edited)

+3
That really depends on us! If concerned Americans turn out at the polls in 2012 (November) as they did in 2010, I think there is no question that he will be a one term President! We must also be unafarid to prosecute any impropriety or election fraud that may take place! We must also push our state election commissions to make, as a prerequisate(spl?) to any Presidential Candidate being on the ballot, documented proof of eligibility to hold the office for which the candidate is running! Any write-ins must provide proof of eligibilty with in two weeks following the election or be those votes will be disqualified!

That should pretty much do it!!!

reply
thegaln... to Andrew 2011/03/22 19:06:08

+1
standing ovation!

reply
luvguins to Andrew 2011/03/22 20:02:49

The only election fraud would have to be the GOP's because you don't have the votes to make Obama a one term president, and the birther gambit isn't going to work for you. The turnout in 2010 was only 40% as usual for midterms.

reply
Andrew to luvguins 2011/03/22 20:07:40

+1
We don't need just Republicans! There are many independents and conservative Democrats who are pretty fed up with the current Administration! Many of them voted for Barack Obama in the last election, because they were fed up by Bush! They will NOT be doing so again! Crawl out of your cave and see the light! I do not guarantee that he will not be reelected, oly that he can be beaten! That is if we do our job as citizens!

reply
luvguins to Andrew 2011/03/22 20:13:09

Dream on. Conservative Democrats aren't that changeable when push comes to shove, and most independents are not extremists, and are very unhappy with the new House in Congress wasting time on issues that don't improve jobs and the economy.

reply
Andrew to luvguins 2011/03/22 20:20:10

+1
The new Congress has been in place for almost three months! If anyone has stalled it's the Party of "NO", the Regressive Democrats! We will change that in 2012! Barack Obama may win! We will see! But the Regressive Democrats will lose the Senate and more ground in the House! Take THAT to the bank!

reply
luvguins to Andrew 2011/03/22 20:29:07

Your party of NO is exactly why you will lose in 2012, and Congress can revert too if the GOP keeps obstructing. 104 GOP filibusters, the most in history has not amused independents like me. Hard to defeat an incumbent when your nominee will probably be Mitt Romney who is now backed by the Koch brothers.

reply
Andrew to luvguins 2011/03/22 20:34:02

You, my friend are NOT an independent! Were you one, you would not be stumping for Democrats alone! You are a Democrat, clear and simple! Don't give us this "independent" line! It won't work! The GOP was doing what their constituents wanted and were rewarded with strong gains in the House, which they now control and the Senate which they will control in 2012! Wanna take bets on that one?!

reply
luvguins to Andrew 2011/03/22 20:59:18

Registered independent who has voted for both parties over the last 30 years, and once for a third running independent. Your potential candidates are either too lame, unknown, or extreme to unseat Obama. If you win both houses it will be slight and Obama's veto pen will be worn out like Bush's was.

reply
Andrew to luvguins 2011/03/22 21:12:15

+1
Bush never VETO'd anything until his last two years in office! Much that his own party passes should have been VETO'd, but wasn't including the prescription drug plan! You just take care of your independent friends and we will hopefully take care of ours! The problem with most Americans is that the Founders are considered extremists! Nobody today holds a candle to their conservatism including myself!

reply
luvguins to Andrew 2011/03/22 21:55:21

Conservatives love to wield the “will of the Founding Fathers” like a sword. How hypocritical. In their day, these men were the leading edge of progressivism! It was progressives that gave us freedom of speech, democracy, abolished slavery, replaced superstition with science, and in so doing, dragged the conservatives kicking and screaming into the future. If we want to prepare, we must continually revamp antiquated thinking with new ideas. As for freedom, it was not a conservative ideology. If so we would still be ruled by a King.

Yes, Bush vetoed bills because Democrats controlled Congress, duh. Read about them to refresh your memory:

http://uspolitics.about.com/o...

reply