Quantcast

Is it time for America to stop its suicidal denial.

Soup Man 2012/09/17 23:37:40
You!
Add Photos & Videos
It is time to open our eyes, and to tell our friends to stop it. Now. Before the most important election of our lives.

The New York Times now says that the President of the United States is avoiding intelligence briefings. He is emotionally incapable of handling the bad news. Denial.

If your friends vote suicidally in November it may be too late. Tell them to stop their nonsense. They are almost ready to get it. Talk with them. I will talk with my friends.

A hundred million conservatives in America can tell the truth without fear. Speak out. Free speech is not just a Constitutional right. Sometimes it's a duty.

America needs a major course correction because we are in profound danger, the greatest danger since the rise of a nuclear-armed Soviet Union under Stalin around 1950. Americans and Europeans were in denial. They did not want to face a possible World War. Stalinist Communists had penetrated the media and the universities starting decades earlier. Then atomic weapons exploded and ordinary people dropped their blinders. They were realists.

Now that the fraudulent "Arab Spring" has turned into openly whipped up rage and hatred against America and the West, our liberals are still in denial. Their power, their privileges, their huge vanity is at stake. That is why they are desperately trying to fool millions of Americans for the next two months. Expect two solid months of Big Lies."
http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/09/denial_is_now_national_suicide.html
expect solid lies http www americanthinker com2012 09 denialisnownationalsuicide html
Add a comment above

Top Opinion

  • Informed Voter 2012/09/18 02:24:49
    Yes
    Informed Voter
    +3
    America: Wake up, damn it or lose YOUR country!!!

    President Obama quoting from his own book, Dreams From My Father:

    “To avoid being mistaken for such a sellout, I chose my friends carefully. The more politically active black students. The foreign students. The Chicanos. The Marxist professors and structural feminists and punk-rock performance poets. We smoked cigarettes and wore leather jackets. At night, in the dorms, we discussed neo-colonialism, Franz Fanon, Eurocentrism, and patriarchy. When we ground out our cigarettes in the hallway carpet or set our stereos so loud that the walls began to shake, we were resisting bourgeois society’s stifling constraints.”
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?...


    And where have we seen the term, bourgeois society before?

    The on-line dictionary defines bourgeois in three ways:
    bour•geois n. pl. bourgeois
    1. A person belonging to the middle class.
    2. A person whose attitudes and behavior are marked by conformity to the standards and conventions of the middle class.
    3. In Marxist theory, a member of the property-owning class; a capitalist.
    Ref: http://www.thefreedictionary....

    So, which definition were you “resisting,” Mr. President? The capitalist middle class, the conforming middle class, or JUST the property-owning class (in our society, ...





















    America: Wake up, damn it or lose YOUR country!!!

    President Obama quoting from his own book, Dreams From My Father:

    “To avoid being mistaken for such a sellout, I chose my friends carefully. The more politically active black students. The foreign students. The Chicanos. The Marxist professors and structural feminists and punk-rock performance poets. We smoked cigarettes and wore leather jackets. At night, in the dorms, we discussed neo-colonialism, Franz Fanon, Eurocentrism, and patriarchy. When we ground out our cigarettes in the hallway carpet or set our stereos so loud that the walls began to shake, we were resisting bourgeois society’s stifling constraints.”
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?...


    And where have we seen the term, bourgeois society before?

    The on-line dictionary defines bourgeois in three ways:
    bour•geois n. pl. bourgeois
    1. A person belonging to the middle class.
    2. A person whose attitudes and behavior are marked by conformity to the standards and conventions of the middle class.
    3. In Marxist theory, a member of the property-owning class; a capitalist.
    Ref: http://www.thefreedictionary....

    So, which definition were you “resisting,” Mr. President? The capitalist middle class, the conforming middle class, or JUST the property-owning class (in our society, they are also the middle class)?

    If you didn’t learn it in today’s public school (which is highly likely you didn’t), you would have to read the Communist Manifesto, itself.


    “By Bourgeoisie is meant the class of modern Capitalists, owners of the means of social production and employers of wage labour.”
    Ref: Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. The Communist Manifesto. Ed. Gareth Stedman Jones. (London: Penguin Books, 1967.), p. 219.

    In our society, “employers of wage labour,” are everyone from big business concerns to small business owners. And most of them ARE middle class.

    “In bourgeois society, capital is independent and has individuality, while the living person is dependent and has no individuality. And the abolition of this state of things is called by the bourgeois, abolition of individuality and freedom! And rightly so. The abolition of bourgeois individuality, bourgeois independence and bourgeois freedom is undoubtedly aimed at.” (Ibid, p. 237)

    “By freedom is meant, under the present bourgeois conditions of production, free trade, free selling and buying.” (Ibid)

    “Abolition of the Family!... On what foundation is the present (bourgeois) family, based? On capital, on private gain. In its completely developed form this family exists only in the bourgeoisie. But this state of things finds its compliment in the practical absence of the family in the proletarians… The bourgeois family will vanish as a matter of course…” (Ibid)

    “The Communists are further reproached with desiring to abolish countries and nationality.” (Ibid, p. 241)

    “The working men have no country.” (Ibid)

    Besides his sought-after Marxist professors, who else guided Obama’s weakening of American political power abroad? Hmm… Who, indeed.

    “Sovereignty is an anachronistic concept; it has been inherited from an age where kings ruled over their subjects.” – George Soros, The Age of Fallibility, 2006
    (more)

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Claybern 2012/09/24 02:59:06
    Yes
    Claybern
    +1
    If we don't vote Obama out of office in November we may be phucked.
  • jasmine1 2012/09/19 03:38:10
    Yes
    jasmine1
    +1
    Denial is our national disease and it is fed by guilt. I do not know where the guilt comes from but it is there. I have talked and talked to libs and they just don't get it or will not believe that it can happen here. Sounds like Nazi Germany to me. The ones that baffle me the most are our Jewish citizens. I would think they would be on top of things. I only hope and pray there are enough of us in November to change the course of America's destruction.
  • bpf 2012/09/19 00:42:08
    Yes
    bpf
    +1
    Just watched "The Hope and Change" REAL ex-Democrats & Independents who made that fatal mistake voting for the community organizer...it will be on again Wednesday at 08:00 PM look for it
  • SimpleAmerican BN-0 2012/09/18 18:54:36
    Yes
    SimpleAmerican BN-0
    +2
    Outlaw the Kool Aid, replace it with a good American beer! Then share the truth with everyone in your neighborhood, have a picnic, place American Flags and Sparklers everywhere... put up signs!

    We have to rise up now against this Tyranny, or Tyranny will get a stronger grip on our society! Read this carefully, slowly and completely...

    When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

    We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and or...

























    &







    Outlaw the Kool Aid, replace it with a good American beer! Then share the truth with everyone in your neighborhood, have a picnic, place American Flags and Sparklers everywhere... put up signs!

    We have to rise up now against this Tyranny, or Tyranny will get a stronger grip on our society! Read this carefully, slowly and completely...

    When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

    We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

    He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
    He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.
    He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.
    He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.
    He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.
    He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.
    He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.
    He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.
    He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.
    He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.
    He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.
    He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.
    He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:
    For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:
    For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:
    For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:
    For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:
    For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:
    For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences
    For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies:
    For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:
    For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.
    He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.
    He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.
    He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.
    He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.
    He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

    In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

    Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our Brittish brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

    We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.
    (more)
  • Informed Voter 2012/09/18 02:24:49
    Yes
    Informed Voter
    +3
    America: Wake up, damn it or lose YOUR country!!!

    President Obama quoting from his own book, Dreams From My Father:

    “To avoid being mistaken for such a sellout, I chose my friends carefully. The more politically active black students. The foreign students. The Chicanos. The Marxist professors and structural feminists and punk-rock performance poets. We smoked cigarettes and wore leather jackets. At night, in the dorms, we discussed neo-colonialism, Franz Fanon, Eurocentrism, and patriarchy. When we ground out our cigarettes in the hallway carpet or set our stereos so loud that the walls began to shake, we were resisting bourgeois society’s stifling constraints.”
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?...


    And where have we seen the term, bourgeois society before?

    The on-line dictionary defines bourgeois in three ways:
    bour•geois n. pl. bourgeois
    1. A person belonging to the middle class.
    2. A person whose attitudes and behavior are marked by conformity to the standards and conventions of the middle class.
    3. In Marxist theory, a member of the property-owning class; a capitalist.
    Ref: http://www.thefreedictionary....

    So, which definition were you “resisting,” Mr. President? The capitalist middle class, the conforming middle class, or JUST the property-owning class (in our society, ...





















    America: Wake up, damn it or lose YOUR country!!!

    President Obama quoting from his own book, Dreams From My Father:

    “To avoid being mistaken for such a sellout, I chose my friends carefully. The more politically active black students. The foreign students. The Chicanos. The Marxist professors and structural feminists and punk-rock performance poets. We smoked cigarettes and wore leather jackets. At night, in the dorms, we discussed neo-colonialism, Franz Fanon, Eurocentrism, and patriarchy. When we ground out our cigarettes in the hallway carpet or set our stereos so loud that the walls began to shake, we were resisting bourgeois society’s stifling constraints.”
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?...


    And where have we seen the term, bourgeois society before?

    The on-line dictionary defines bourgeois in three ways:
    bour•geois n. pl. bourgeois
    1. A person belonging to the middle class.
    2. A person whose attitudes and behavior are marked by conformity to the standards and conventions of the middle class.
    3. In Marxist theory, a member of the property-owning class; a capitalist.
    Ref: http://www.thefreedictionary....

    So, which definition were you “resisting,” Mr. President? The capitalist middle class, the conforming middle class, or JUST the property-owning class (in our society, they are also the middle class)?

    If you didn’t learn it in today’s public school (which is highly likely you didn’t), you would have to read the Communist Manifesto, itself.


    “By Bourgeoisie is meant the class of modern Capitalists, owners of the means of social production and employers of wage labour.”
    Ref: Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. The Communist Manifesto. Ed. Gareth Stedman Jones. (London: Penguin Books, 1967.), p. 219.

    In our society, “employers of wage labour,” are everyone from big business concerns to small business owners. And most of them ARE middle class.

    “In bourgeois society, capital is independent and has individuality, while the living person is dependent and has no individuality. And the abolition of this state of things is called by the bourgeois, abolition of individuality and freedom! And rightly so. The abolition of bourgeois individuality, bourgeois independence and bourgeois freedom is undoubtedly aimed at.” (Ibid, p. 237)

    “By freedom is meant, under the present bourgeois conditions of production, free trade, free selling and buying.” (Ibid)

    “Abolition of the Family!... On what foundation is the present (bourgeois) family, based? On capital, on private gain. In its completely developed form this family exists only in the bourgeoisie. But this state of things finds its compliment in the practical absence of the family in the proletarians… The bourgeois family will vanish as a matter of course…” (Ibid)

    “The Communists are further reproached with desiring to abolish countries and nationality.” (Ibid, p. 241)

    “The working men have no country.” (Ibid)

    Besides his sought-after Marxist professors, who else guided Obama’s weakening of American political power abroad? Hmm… Who, indeed.

    “Sovereignty is an anachronistic concept; it has been inherited from an age where kings ruled over their subjects.” – George Soros, The Age of Fallibility, 2006
    (more)
  • Nightmusic 2012/09/18 01:18:51
    Yes
    Nightmusic
    +2
    He should have been impeached a long time ago. s incompetent and mentally deranged.
  • tommyg - POTL- PWCM-JLA 2012/09/18 01:09:58
    Yes
    tommyg - POTL- PWCM-JLA
    +1
    Agreed. I've been speaking to people for a couple of years now.
  • ConLibFraud 2012/09/18 00:40:01
    Yes
    ConLibFraud
    +1
    It is time for you conservatives to stop the denial that ORomney will save the day!
  • Soup Man ConLibF... 2012/09/18 00:58:49
  • ConLibF... Soup Man 2012/09/18 01:13:46
    ConLibFraud
    +2
    Where did I call Ofraud good? I didn't! Just more denial on your part.
  • Soup Man ConLibF... 2012/09/18 01:31:26
    Soup Man
    Just a sample post, your assumptions precedes you am afraid
  • ConLibF... Soup Man 2012/09/18 01:36:47
    ConLibFraud
    +2
    Nice dodge.
  • Soup Man ConLibF... 2012/09/19 00:56:58
    Soup Man
    No I drive a Ford
  • Paige 2012/09/17 23:39:17
    Yes
    Paige
  • Soup Man Paige 2012/09/17 23:43:55
    Soup Man
    +3
    Indeed.
    Thanks for the post
  • Paige Soup Man 2012/09/17 23:45:14

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2014/04/19 14:50:32

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals