Quantcast

Is It OK to Abort One of a Pair of Twins?

SodaHead News 2011/08/16 18:24:13
You!
Add Photos & Videos
Thanks to advances in in-vitro fertilization and more women waiting longer to conceive, the rate of multi births has skyrocketed over the past decade.

Doctors have been able to reduce the risk to the mothers and babies, but thanks to the risk to the mother of carrying three or more fetuses, OB/GYN's have developed a method of reducing multiple pregnancies down to a more manageable two fetuses. The procedure involves inserting a needle filled with potassium chloride into the heart of one of the fetuses around 12 weeks, which stops its heartbeat.

In fact, some women pregnant with twins who believe they don't have the resources to care for two babies have also decided to terminate one of the fetuses in utero. The New York Times tackled the sticky issue of twin reduction for non-medical reasons this week, speaking to the doctors who perform these procedures and the women who undergo them.

While author Sarah Hrdy argues it was more common for women to abandon a child moments after birth if they felt they couldn't take care of the baby in her book "Mother Nature: Maternal Instincts and How They Shape the Human Species," some Times readers have ben asking what constitutes "necessary resources" these days?
Add a comment above

Top Opinion

  • CUDDLY BUT STILL CRABBY 2011/08/17 17:37:01
    No
    CUDDLY BUT STILL CRABBY
    +50
    No. It is not OK.

    Progressives/liberals/communists will pull out all of the stops to save the life of any convicted killer destined for judicially-mandated punishment, yet will murder thousands of innocents in the womb on a daily basis.

    That's an ongoing dichotomy of reasonable thought that perplexes the majority of us.

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Deb DJL 2011/08/17 10:53:04
    Deb
    Too damn bad. Everyone knows the risks if invitro. Thats like bein a alcoholic and crying cuz your liver us failing..deal with the consequences
  • DJL Deb 2011/08/17 23:11:05
    DJL
    So it is better to have both babies die than it is to abort one? Great logic.
  • Deb DJL 2011/08/24 11:16:10 (edited)
    Deb
    Umm this isnt about killing one to save another,they are both healthy and so is the mother,this is the mom not wanting two babies,she just wants one and doesnt want to deal with the repercussions of invitro. And youd rather risk both babies dying to kill one off out of convienience?...Great logic
  • DJL Deb 2011/08/24 20:56:02
    DJL
    Aborting one to decrease the risk to both is the best choice.
  • Deb DJL 2011/08/24 21:40:48
    Deb
    Yeah but a stickin a needle anywhere near those babies causes risk to both of them,and people spend an ton of money for invitro to risk going home empty handed..its stupid,if they dont want both they can just give the other up for adoption.either way the wanted twin will be the one who suffers,they always know when somethin is missing
  • DJL Deb 2011/08/24 23:18:59
    DJL
    The risk of aborting one is far less than he risk of losing both if one isn't aborted.
  • Deb DJL 2011/08/25 00:27:49
    Deb
    You keep missing the point,unless there is a medical need,which there is not,there is no reason to endager both
  • DJL Deb 2011/08/25 00:34:30
    DJL
    The person that I know that lost both didn't know there was a problem. If she would have aborted one she probably would have a child rigt now.
  • Deb DJL 2011/09/12 17:51:11
    Deb
    I understand,but blame that on her idiot gynecologist who didnt know what he was doing,any multiple pregnancy is considered high risk. There are plenty of tests now that can find problems.
  • DJL Deb 2011/09/13 00:23:43
    DJL
    Then lower the risk by aborting the second fetus so that a least one survives. Better one healthy baby than two dead ones.. There is no test to determine if someone is going to go into premature labor.
  • Eric ~ The Logician 2011/08/17 08:24:56
    Yes
    Eric ~ The Logician
    No harm comes from it whatsoever.
  • mod pod Eric ~ ... 2011/08/17 10:24:21
    mod pod
    +1
    Except the death of a living thing.
  • Eric ~ ... mod pod 2011/08/17 15:35:20
    Eric ~ The Logician
    Suppose I grant you the premise that it's a living thing (which is totally absurd). How can you say that preventing it from being born is causing harm to it?
  • mod pod Eric ~ ... 2011/08/17 22:04:06
    mod pod
    Honestly? If I kill you am I harming you? Is a foetus alive? Yes and yes. Pay attention in science.
  • Adam Julian 2011/08/17 08:05:04
    No
    Adam Julian
    +1
    It's only ok to abort if the baby being born could harm the woman (miscarriage). But this is too far.
  • Little Fawn 2011/08/17 08:02:19
  • Brandon 2011/08/17 07:57:34
    Undecided
    Brandon
    They have a right to do so. Until it changes they are allowed to do as they please.
  • Deb Brandon 2011/08/17 10:55:00
    Deb
    I hope she dies of an anuerism shortly after giving birth
  • Brandon Deb 2011/08/18 02:58:03
    Brandon
    What an ignorant response, and you consider yourself "pro life"?
  • davidl 2011/08/17 07:51:11
    No
    davidl
    +3
    "Twin reduction", i.e., baby killing is a form of financial planning? Why stop there, kill the old people, ugly people, sick people, or just people in general.
  • Marek davidl 2011/08/17 09:20:17
    Marek
    +1
    Killing of old and sick is provided for in obama care.
  • Mr. Bean Marek 2011/08/18 11:11:58
    Mr. Bean
    You are a moron, no it is not read the health care bill
  • Marek Mr. Bean 2011/08/19 06:18:13
    Marek
    +1
    Are you sure that you are not a moron? Did you read it? progressive marxists killed over 120 million people in the 20th century alone so what is to stop them from killing old and sick?
    progressive marxists killed 120 people 20th century killing sick liberal idiot
  • MonuvediMonu 2011/08/17 07:47:58
    Yes
    MonuvediMonu
    no comments.
  • Rachel ~In HP I Trust~ 2011/08/17 07:42:35
    No
    Rachel ~In HP I Trust~
    +3
    That's just DISGUSTING! Those poor little babies...never knowing a full life or the love of a mother. I just don't understand what kind of sick person could kill a harmless baby...GIVE THE CHILD UP FOR ADOPTION IF YOU CAN'T TAKE CARE OF IT. WHEN did this country decide murder is a better option than adoption?!?!
  • 9th of 9 Rachel ... 2011/08/17 09:55:23
    9th of 9
    +1
    I want to personally thank you (publicly) for your utmost respect in caring for unborn children everywhere. They truly need a voice such as yours.

    Thank you.
  • Rachel ... 9th of 9 2011/08/17 18:35:25
    Rachel ~In HP I Trust~
    +1
    You're welcome! I'm just speaking my mind!!
  • 9th of 9 Rachel ... 2011/08/17 22:51:37
    9th of 9
    +1
    Works for me :)
  • Decipher 2011/08/17 07:40:50
    No
    Decipher
    No, get rid of both of them >:)
  • Cassie 2011/08/17 07:35:02
    No
    Cassie
    +5
    I am a pro-life atheist. I believe it is unethical to take away a person's only chance at life.
  • Nuke Cassie 2011/08/17 08:58:36
    Nuke
    +2
    Well that's both interesting and refreshing.
  • Marek Cassie 2011/08/17 09:23:23
    Marek
    +3
    Very well put! So am I.
    Funny how the pro death people accuse me of being Christian.
  • Cassie Marek 2011/08/17 09:38:55
    Cassie
    +2
    I also wonder what kind of adaptations this would cause in fetuses... or in the mothers carrying them.
  • Marek Cassie 2011/08/17 14:38:23
    Marek
    +2
    A very good question.
  • Nuke Marek 2011/08/17 09:48:51
    Nuke
    +2
    haha I think that pretty much sums it up, pro death nails it pretty well.
  • Wyveryx 2011/08/17 07:27:30
    Undecided
    Wyveryx
    Loaded question. You should have just asked if you want others to live your life for you and make your decisions for you for the rest of your life.
  • Myrle Hulme 2011/08/17 07:24:22
    No
    Myrle Hulme
    +1
    Unless there is a medical reason for it NO. they wanted children so they went for in-vitro fertilization they must take the consequences
  • William Day 2011/08/17 06:45:17
    Yes
    William Day
    If it might endanger the life of the mother I don't see why not.
  • Nuke William... 2011/08/17 09:02:47
    Nuke
    +2
    Except doctors are lying jackwaggons...
    The doctor said if my Grandmother didn't abort my Mother they would both die, My Grandmother went ahead with it and my Mom and Grandmother were fine...
    I don't believe any mother is at risk because of this and that Doctors don't know what the hell they're talking about.
    I have seen time after time when doctors screwed up people including a lot of my family members because they were morons who didn't know what they were doing or talking about.
    If my Mother would have been aborted I would not be here today so I am obviously against abortion.
  • William... Nuke 2011/08/17 09:07:43
    William Day
    Of course doctors can be wrong too, considering they are still doing little more than fumbling around in the dark because medicine has been hindered from many angles, religion being one of the leaders, from advancing very far. Of course I wouldn't be here if my mother were aborted, and if my mother had aborted me I wouldn't have blamed her, I am much more understanding than that. There are many cases where both the mother AND the fetus are in danger and if they don't abort there is a chance that they both would die, and I wouldn't force a woman to die if she would rather abort the fetus and live to possibly bear another child safely.

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2013/05/25 17:47:14

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals