Quantcast

Is It OK for a Child to Have More Than Two Parents?

Fef 2012/07/03 21:00:00
You!
Add Photos & Videos
California Democrats want to increase the number of parents a child can have. SB 1476 would allow a child to have more than two parents at the same time in order to accommodate same-sex parents, surrogates, assisted reproduction, and other non-traditional parental relationships.

SacBee.com reports: Mom and Dad, same-sex couples or blended families, California law is clear: No more than two legal parents per child. State Sen. Mark Leno is pushing legislation to allow a child to have multiple parents.

"The bill brings California into the 21st century, recognizing that there are more than Ozzie and Harriet families today," Leno said. But some disagree. "It comes as no surprise that he would try to say that a child has more than two parents – that's absurd," said Benjamin Lopez, a legislative analyst for Traditional Values Coalition, a Bible-based civil rights group.

SacBee points out potential problems and complexities caused by SB 1476:
Tax deductions, citizenship, probate, public assistance, school notifications and Social Security rights all can be affected by determinations of parenthood, notes the Association of Certified Family Law Specialists.

Examples of three-parent relationships that could be affected by SB 1476 include: 1) A family in which a man began dating a woman while she was pregnant, then raised that child with her for seven years. The youth also had a parental relationship with the biological father. 2) A same-sex couple who asked a close male friend to help them conceive, then decided that all three would raise the child. 3) A divorce in which a woman and her second husband were the legal parents of a child, but the biological father maintained close ties as well. How do you feel about the proposed bill?

Read More: http://www.sacbee.com/2012/07/02/4604048/californi...

Add a comment above

Top Opinion

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • acacia86 Weronikus 2012/07/05 19:14:01
    acacia86
    +1
    one possibility, another possibility, I can actually use a real life example: I had a friend in elementary school, I won't give names. Her parents were never married. Her Dad did marry someone other than my friend's mom. My friend formed a stronger bond with her step-mom than anyone else. Then my friend's father and her step-mom divorced and she lost contact with my friend for sometime. By the time she came back into my then former friend's life, she was out of control. She was doing drugs, selling herself to support her habit, running away from home whenever she had a fight with either of her parents, and all of this before she was 15. At the age of 15, she got into a fight with her bio mom and disappeared. That was ten years ago, they just found her remains. If her step-mom had been legally allowed to maintain contact or adopt my fromer friend, I doubt that would've been her fate. I really do. Yes you can look at the negative side of it and there's always a negative possibility or side to just about anything, but there's also a positive. I truly can't see anything wrong with providing a child with a larger legal net of people to turn to in a crisis, or just for a bit of parent-child bonding. This sort of thing, this proposed idea, could actually save a few children.
  • Weronikus acacia86 2012/07/06 03:13:12
    Weronikus
    Well, that I understand. I only mean that three or more people at once shouldn't raise a child. For example, my parents: My mum is really soft-hearted, if you plead enough she'll give almost anything. Dad's not so soft. The moment he hears about something to be bought or done, that he does not consider needed or of any use, he says 'no'. Of course, he explains why. In other words, my parent's kinda level out. If there was another person on either side, I and my bro would probably get spoiled or we'd be in a spartian camp.
    And I'm quite sorry for your former friend. It's a shame such terrible things happened to her. May she find the right way once again.
  • acacia86 Weronikus 2012/07/06 06:11:14
    acacia86
    +1
    but that also depends primarily on the personalities of the parents too. My mom was a complete raving lunatic while my Dad was level-headed, calm, fun and goofy. I had a much better relationship with him than I could ever have with my mom.

    Dad, I went to him about everything, from bullies to what I wanted for my birthday/christmas, when I wanted to learn how to do something, or even the changes during puberty. Dad taught me all of it, and he did the best thing I think any father can do, he didn't lie about his personal history and was honest about how a lot of teenage boys think when it comes to girls and their own physical changes. So I was prepared for being called a lesbian because I chose not to put out, but Dad was proud that I didn't do that sort of thing.
  • Weronikus acacia86 2012/07/06 07:41:19
    Weronikus
    My mum other than being soft hearted is quite nice, though she has her rules too. My dad is really fun to be with, I also have a better relationship with my dad than mum.
    I go to dad with problems, because I can't count on mum. When I ask her about changes within me or what happens around me, she just laughes and says it's natural. My dad on the other hand tells me each detail, so I rely on him more to explain stuff to me. It's actually thanks to him and not my mum that I've finally started to open up on people.
  • acacia86 Weronikus 2012/07/13 19:14:18
    acacia86
    +1
    That's good. :) I'm glad things worked out for you. Not all are so lucky to have parents who are polar opposites but still manage to compliment each other.
  • Weronikus acacia86 2012/07/13 20:16:23
    Weronikus
    +1
    I know I'm lucky when it comes to my parents. Even they laugh at each other and their differences - it seems they're finding out new stuff about themselves every day. And in the growing number of unsuccessful marriages - well, I'm just grateful my parents love me and each other.
  • acacia86 2012/07/05 18:48:17 (edited)
    Yes
    acacia86
    +3
    Look at this way: More parents = More people to form bonds with = more chances child will be comfortable enough to go to a parent instead of the internet/strangers.

    Biologically nothing can ever be altered, there's one egg and one sperm, and one person providing each necessary component. Biology will always be the same, laws are supposed to reflect the public. If California law does not recognize step-parents as legal guardians or having the same legal rights as the biological parents, this needs to change.

    those three sets of examples are prime examples of why this sort of thing needs to happen. Not just for female same-sex couples either, but male same-sex couples who ask a friend to carry their child for them as some do. Why should a woman carry a child for 9 months, and then lose all legal bonds to that child because some law says 'Two parents'? That would put an immense amount of strain on the friendship as well, and yes some will say, "then hire a surrogate" surrogates do not come cheap and not everyone can afford them.
  • Tennessee3501 2012/07/05 18:37:22
    Yes
    Tennessee3501
    +2
    I do not see any harm in the legislation, nor do I see any necessity. We have had blended families forever, but there is only one biological father and one biological mother. The legislation may be necessary in rare cases for legal reasons, but it should be used only when absolutely necessary.
  • a41bsblsnsync 2012/07/05 18:32:04
    No
    a41bsblsnsync
    +1
    I say no I don't think it is ok for a child to have more than 2 parents it should be a mother & father or same sex but the only way the would is if the mother & father get divorced & get remarried or same as for the same sex if they divorce & get remarried!!!!!!
  • kaiterpotater 2012/07/05 18:28:07
    Yes
    kaiterpotater
    +4
    Can't wait to move to California where they are realistic about life! This is a step in the riht direction!
  • sassyleader 2012/07/05 18:28:04
    No
    sassyleader
    +1
    i cant believe yes and no are almost equal on votes. Just goes to show that half the human race is retarded(i mean no disrespect to retarded people..as far as I'm concerned they're smarter than these yes voters)...

    i actually was introduced to this subject in my English class recently, and all of the people in class agreed that it's insanely stupid. It's bad enough for kids to have 2 parents who tell them what to do, but 3..4? Hang yourself. The kids will go insane. I know i would. Come on, leave the poor kids alone. Let them have as decent a life as possible. You aren't fixing anything, you are breaking everything! Maybe it takes "a village" to raise someone, but that's the old way, when people used to think alike(besides.even that happened rarely in those times). But now, you'll be asking a kid to take on ten times more stress, and if you don't know anything, the kids are already stressing with just 2 parents. Screw off!
  • Kenneth... sassyle... 2012/07/05 20:47:15
    Kenneth Huang
    +1
    People already have more than two parents (and are presumably "stressing" over it). This bill wouldn't require everyone to have more than two parents; it would just provide some legal structure for those relationships that already exist.
  • Larry 2012/07/05 18:20:23
    No
    Larry
    +1
    just more liberalism
  • leadhead09 2012/07/05 18:11:29
    No
    leadhead09
    Regarding same sex parents, do you realize how bad these kids will get picked on? I think it may confuse the kid JUST A BIT. lol
  • leadhead09 leadhead09 2012/07/05 18:13:23
    leadhead09
    I just want Cali's Medical Marijuana in my state:) That is all.
  • acacia86 leadhead09 2012/07/06 16:26:26 (edited)
    acacia86
    Zach Wahls - look him up on youtube and you'll actually hear his own words on the topic.

    I also know a few adults in my community who were raised by same-sex parents and honestly it had zero impact on the quality of their character and if anything they had an easier time talking to their parents about sexuality and sexual activity. You want to know the 'shocking' bit? The ones raised by same-sex parents are 90% of the time straight. The same percentage as children raised by straight parents.

    My best friend is a lesbian, she's married to her wife. My friend has 4 children from previous relationships or encounters (I won't say what actually happened, just that homophobia is still a horrible issue and you can fill in the rest with your imagination) with men. I'm the god mother of the three youngest ones.

    The eldest girl (13) is into boys, the little boy (about 5) is already picking dandilions and giving them to girls, because they're 'cute'. His twin sister tends to chase boys around. The youngest girl is just potty training, but equally interacts with boys and girls her age. They're completely fine. Yes the eldest does get picked on, but surprisingly the bullying comes from her mom's family, nobody else. Far as the school board's concerned, she doesn't show signs of abuse or negl...





    Zach Wahls - look him up on youtube and you'll actually hear his own words on the topic.

    I also know a few adults in my community who were raised by same-sex parents and honestly it had zero impact on the quality of their character and if anything they had an easier time talking to their parents about sexuality and sexual activity. You want to know the 'shocking' bit? The ones raised by same-sex parents are 90% of the time straight. The same percentage as children raised by straight parents.

    My best friend is a lesbian, she's married to her wife. My friend has 4 children from previous relationships or encounters (I won't say what actually happened, just that homophobia is still a horrible issue and you can fill in the rest with your imagination) with men. I'm the god mother of the three youngest ones.

    The eldest girl (13) is into boys, the little boy (about 5) is already picking dandilions and giving them to girls, because they're 'cute'. His twin sister tends to chase boys around. The youngest girl is just potty training, but equally interacts with boys and girls her age. They're completely fine. Yes the eldest does get picked on, but surprisingly the bullying comes from her mom's family, nobody else. Far as the school board's concerned, she doesn't show signs of abuse or neglect, not their issue.

    "Your mother is corrupting you with her life style!" being the most common taunt from her maternal grandfather.

    The kids and teachers in her school couldn't give less of a rat's backside what her mom's orientation is. All the teachers care about: she makes good grades, does her homework, and dresses appropriately for school. She doesn't have unexplained bruises, doesn't miss a lot of school, and she has never shown any signs of sexual abuse.

    She has a bit of a smart-mouth at times, but so do most her age.
    (more)
  • Firefly 2012/07/05 17:54:19 (edited)
    No
    Firefly
    +2
    I grew up with step-parents, and

    though they were ( are ) both great people,

    the family dynamic has become way too intense...

    Two sets of parents, four sets of Grandparents, and each

    with thier set of ideals, opinions, and rules, which created MAJOR

    power struggles, amongst themselves, and caused HUGE grief for us kids ~

    Not to mention the challenges of an additional six brothers and sisters from it all...

    Raising children is a job, for one man, and one woman, to do, together, in wedlock, period !
  • acacia86 Firefly 2012/07/06 16:49:26
    acacia86
    provided no abuse is involved. Whether that is from sexual abuse, emotional abuse (isolation, refusing to let a child participate in organized sports, degrading them for weight/nationality/something else they can't control), munchausen's or physical abuse. I guess those should also be the only reasons for divorce.... but wait, it usually is.

    cheating is emotionally abusive.

    Degrading and humiliating someone because they aren't just like your mom/dad is abusive.

    And let's not forget some women actually experience domestic violence for the very first time while pregnant.

    So, maybe their intent was one man, one woman in wedlock but they began to fear for their safety and the baby's safety and if they could carry to term, so they divorce. She has the baby, remarries, mean time first husband goes into couseling and anger management. Gets a therapist to vouch for him, boom instant paternal rights and the man the child's known to be 'dad' since birth suddenly has no rights.


    Now tell me that's fair to the child and the man who raised the child.
  • Firefly acacia86 2012/07/06 17:28:28
    Firefly
    ummm...

    Sorry, can't reply ~

    My head has just spun out

    from your myriad of scenarios, and,

    no dis' intended, but, to be quite honest...

    I really don't need to defend, or expound, further ~

    Sounds like YOU have some issues to address, though,

    as, that which you mentioned above doesn't come from thin aire...

    I'll pray for you, that everything turns out well, and that you find peace :0 )
  • acacia86 Firefly 2012/07/06 17:52:44
    acacia86
    you have no reason to defend anything at all. I understand what you said, but I also know from my life and from witnessing what some of my friends went through as children and the drama that went on in their families as well as within my own, I can understand how this law is not only benficial but a means of protecting a child as well.

    There are professionals to help with setting up compromise methods so each parenting party is pacified and work collectively to meet the best interests of the child, the unfortunate part being that therapy is still a taboo topic to some people. Yet child protectors in my area recommend that when going through a divorce, divorcing parents as well as the children attend regular therapy sessions to set a stable foundation in their new life and that when introducing a new guardian or parent into a child's life, a professional is there to help guide the process and attempt to make the transition easier on all involved. That any power struggles be limited to discussions between parents, ect.

    Yes, nothing is ever ideal. it's true, and those scenarios regretably I have witnessed either as a by stander or a distant relative. Those scenarios I feel strongly could be less dire with more than two legal parents having rights to the child as then if something happens to one parent, either through legal issues or illness, there's still two people to raise the child and less chance of the child becoming a ward of the state.
  • Firefly acacia86 2012/07/06 18:06:44
    Firefly
    Well,

    Thanks for sharing your opinion ~

    But you won't change mine, so please stop trying to do so...
  • Erin Ward Valdez 2012/07/05 17:49:43
    Yes
    Erin Ward Valdez
    +3
    I have a step-dad, and I consider him my father. I also consider my biological father, my father. And then you have my mom, that makes three parents, and I am completetly fine with that.
  • Nicole Mcintosh 2012/07/05 17:38:02
    Yes
    Nicole Mcintosh
    +3
    My parents died when I was a baby. I was raised by the committee of my reservation. I was raised by an organization. I liked it.
  • CarrieD... Nicole ... 2012/07/05 17:39:08
    CarrieDonnelly
    +1
    But you did not need a new law to accomplish that. So, you are proof it is NOT needed.
  • Stan Kapusta 2012/07/05 17:35:24
    No
    Stan Kapusta
    +1
    Only in California. More than 2 people may raise the child. There will only be 2 parents. It's a small detail called biology.
  • peacepudding 2012/07/05 17:25:41
    Yes
    peacepudding
    +1
    It takes a village.
  • CarrieD... peacepu... 2012/07/05 17:41:28
    CarrieDonnelly
    +1
    So, then the "village" should all have the equal rights on decision making for the child. The bio parents should not make decisions on education, healthcare, or even what the child should eat. That sounds a lot like Marxism.
  • peacepu... CarrieD... 2012/07/12 14:35:54
    peacepudding
    You are assuming that the "bio" parents would not have final decision making. My point being that parenting is the most important and difficult job there is and requires huge support and guidance from the extended family or village. And if that is "Marxism" so be it. I am not afraid of labels from someone who hurls them at me. Oh, have you read Marx by the way or are you afraid of labels?
  • OneLast... peacepu... 2012/07/05 17:49:18
  • peacepu... OneLast... 2012/07/12 14:38:18
    peacepudding
    If you don't want a reply then don't reply to my comment!
  • OneLast... peacepu... 2012/07/12 16:04:40 (edited)
    OneLastWord
    Reply is welcome,
    I should have said:

    Don't want a PC reply like liberals alway pull out of their asses on a regular basis.
  • peacepu... OneLast... 2012/07/12 20:57:27
    peacepudding
    What is A PC reply?
  • OneLast... peacepu... 2012/07/13 13:22:10
    OneLastWord
    POLITICAL CORRECTNESS and most people in this day and time just want to be PC so they look good and are not thought of as bigots, or other things like backward thinkers, and it’s not really them, they are trying to be just what they have heard.

    “Be yourself”, is all I say, it's OK to have a few prejudges as long as there the kind that are mostly preferences.
  • peacepu... OneLast... 2012/07/13 18:00:26
    peacepudding
    +1
    OK! I thought the term PC referred to Personal Computer. Now, political correctness is a term that has a bad name these days because it has to do with thinking that is not original. Hmm, I'm afraid that original thinking is a very rare commodity, but is often assigned to inventors.
  • ART 2012/07/05 17:23:37
    No
    ART
    +6
    ONE MOM AND ONE DAD, ONE FEMALE, ONE MALE, NOT 3 GUYS AND 4 DOGS AND A SHEEP
  • Larry ART 2012/07/05 17:55:58
    Larry
    +1
    the sheep is for one of the dad's why the other 2 are busy
  • Tom Trojan 2012/07/05 17:23:09
    No
    Tom Trojan
    +1
    What a joke.... you cannot raise a child by "committee..."
  • Gracie - Proud Conservative 2012/07/05 17:21:11
    No
    Gracie - Proud Conservative
    +4
    Here's your slippery slope! We can't even get two parents to agree on the custody and welfare of children, what makes them think getting more people involved will make it better. It's ridiculous!!!!!!
  • Myopinionmatters 2012/07/05 17:16:38
    No
    Myopinionmatters
    +2
    That makes no sense at all...
  • MichaelTaylor 2012/07/05 17:14:40
    No
    MichaelTaylor
    +2
    HELL NO! Enough with this, "Let's just make up all of our own rules...after all there is no God"

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2013/05/20 12:02:39

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals