Quantcast

Is It OK for a Child to Have More Than Two Parents?

Fef 2012/07/03 21:00:00
You!
Add Photos & Videos
California Democrats want to increase the number of parents a child can have. SB 1476 would allow a child to have more than two parents at the same time in order to accommodate same-sex parents, surrogates, assisted reproduction, and other non-traditional parental relationships.

SacBee.com reports: Mom and Dad, same-sex couples or blended families, California law is clear: No more than two legal parents per child. State Sen. Mark Leno is pushing legislation to allow a child to have multiple parents.

"The bill brings California into the 21st century, recognizing that there are more than Ozzie and Harriet families today," Leno said. But some disagree. "It comes as no surprise that he would try to say that a child has more than two parents – that's absurd," said Benjamin Lopez, a legislative analyst for Traditional Values Coalition, a Bible-based civil rights group.

SacBee points out potential problems and complexities caused by SB 1476:
Tax deductions, citizenship, probate, public assistance, school notifications and Social Security rights all can be affected by determinations of parenthood, notes the Association of Certified Family Law Specialists.

Examples of three-parent relationships that could be affected by SB 1476 include: 1) A family in which a man began dating a woman while she was pregnant, then raised that child with her for seven years. The youth also had a parental relationship with the biological father. 2) A same-sex couple who asked a close male friend to help them conceive, then decided that all three would raise the child. 3) A divorce in which a woman and her second husband were the legal parents of a child, but the biological father maintained close ties as well. How do you feel about the proposed bill?

Read More: http://www.sacbee.com/2012/07/02/4604048/californi...

Add a comment above

Top Opinion

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Chris ☆ Queen... 2012/07/04 20:44:18
    Chris
    That's a very selfish attitude. In a tribe of 100 people surely you don't think it's fair for one person to own 40% of the tribe's food. It's immature to believe that person somehow deserves more than everyone else when there are people dying they have so little. What opportunities did the 3,500 African children that died today from starvation have to survive, let alone make millions of dollars like Justin Bieber?
  • ☆ Queen... Chris 2012/07/04 21:06:02
  • Chris ☆ Queen... 2012/07/04 21:25:32
    Chris
    What opportunities did the 3,500 African children that died today from starvation have to survive, let alone make millions of dollars like Justin Bieber?
  • exhon2009 Chris 2012/07/04 23:12:37
    exhon2009
    +1
    There are many rich people out there donating billions to assist Africans such as Bill Gates who I believe pledged many billions of dollars along with Warren Buffet to help, among others, Africans, who are suffering from disease. If there were no rich people in this world what you see in Africa would be twenty times worse and it wouldn't be just in Africa but worldwide. How do you know Bieber doesn't donate generously to worthy causes?
  • Chris exhon2009 2012/07/04 23:20:07 (edited)
    Chris
    +1
    If there were no rich people that means there are no poor people.... there is no money in that world, which means we would be able to have the resources, which the monetary system holds back currently, to feed the world and raise the standard of living for everyone. We don't do this now because the idea of money holds us back, it's not "profitable" to feed the hungry, so we have them die instead. And then the few with all the resources give away crumbs and expect a pat on the head.

  • exhon2009 Chris 2012/07/04 23:24:37
    exhon2009
    +1
    That's the problem with the liberal view of economics, that it is a zero sum game. It is NOT a zero sum game. If it were all of us would still be hunter gatherers.
  • Chris exhon2009 2012/07/04 23:28:52
  • exhon2009 Chris 2012/07/04 23:33:33
    exhon2009
    Hope you have a happy fourth Chris.
  • Chris exhon2009 2012/07/05 00:08:34
    Chris
    you to :)
  • exhon2009 Chris 2012/07/04 23:42:31
    exhon2009
    If the free market holds science back then the USSR would have become the leading country on the planet in every category. The USSR ditched communism a few years after a little noticed fact occurred. Japan passed the USSR to become the second largest economy on the planet. Before you think about ditching the current system you need to have something better to replace it with.
  • Chris exhon2009 2012/07/05 00:08:12 (edited)
    Chris
    I thought the video I posted gave a clear example of what that replacement system would be. But if you need further explanation...
  • exhon2009 Chris 2012/07/05 19:55:29
    exhon2009
    Chris: I listened to the entire 19 minute video. This system has already been tried. It is called communism. It failed miserably. Two problems with the free market system are that it allegedly degrades the environment and creates wars. The US, Europe and ALL free market economies are infinitely cleaner than the USSR, China and ALL OTHER communist countries. Totalitarian engage in wars against other states. Democratic states do not engage in wars against other democratic states.

    This video doesn't discuss the mechanism for implementing this economic model. There is a very good reason for that. It would scare the hell out of people and turn them off to the arguments in the video. It is called the dictatorship of the proletariat. The moderator keeps saying "we" are able to re-arrange society..... Did you stop to consider who "we" are? Adam Smith still had the best idea over 200 years ago. This video is a deceptive but elegant rehash of a failed system.
  • ☆ Queen... exhon2009 2012/07/05 02:08:53
    ☆ QueenAline
    +1
    exactly.....and he probably does...i wouldn't doubt it.
  • Resp Chris 2012/07/06 14:33:40
    Resp
    Africa will always be a stone-age backward continent. Don't throw your money to Africa.
  • iamnothere 2012/07/04 02:10:17
    No
    iamnothere
    +4
    calling a spade a club does not make it a heart

    As with most things demoncrat.. there likely is another unintended consequence.. Dept of Social Services can go to the deep pockets over and over and over.. even if the new parents break up.. Think about it...
  • ♌βļąƈʞƦơșƐ3033♌ 2012/07/04 02:09:48
    Yes
    ♌βļąƈʞƦơșƐ3033♌
    +4
    Nothing wrong with more than two people loving a child like it's their child.
  • ☆ Queen... ♌βļąƈʞƦ... 2012/07/04 02:30:24
    ☆ QueenAline
    +2
    that wasn't the question....the question is about a bill, to legally make it so that children can legally have more than 2 parents....ridiculous. no one is saying that more than two people can love a child..
  • ♌βļąƈʞƦ... ☆ Queen... 2012/07/04 02:32:01
    ♌βļąƈʞƦơșƐ3033♌
    +1
    But I'm saying legally, there's nothing wrong with more than two people to love a kid like it's their own.
  • ☆ Queen... ♌βļąƈʞƦ... 2012/07/04 02:54:08
    ☆ QueenAline
    +1
    so why do we need government to pass a bill that says it's ok for a child to have more than two parents...when the fact remains that a child can only have two (biological) parents...and no more....A child can have step parents,, grand parents, surrogate parents...but where...NO WHY..do we need this to be in legislation? Answer..we dont'..it's absurd...Government needs to GET OUT of our lives..and let us live our lives in freedom....not constantly be bombarding us with RULES and REGULATIONS and more LAWS
  • ♌βļąƈʞƦ... ☆ Queen... 2012/07/04 03:04:09
    ♌βļąƈʞƦơșƐ3033♌
    +1
    I don't know why it does. ask the people trying to pass the bill! Not me. I only wanted to answer a simple question not get into a debate.
  • ☆ Queen... ♌βļąƈʞƦ... 2012/07/04 13:41:31
    ☆ QueenAline
    you made the statement, not me....i don't see it as a debate...just trying to understand what it is that YOU don't understand a bout this question, and why we need government to make these stupid decisions for us....sorry for having inconvenienced you
  • kotabear ☆ Queen... 2012/07/04 02:33:34
    kotabear
    +1
    Yeah but now it's just making it recognized by law. So why not?
  • Stacy F kotabear 2012/07/04 02:56:28
    Stacy F
    +1
    And we need another law, because...?
  • ☆ Queen... Stacy F 2012/07/04 03:03:26
    ☆ QueenAline
    thanks for answering that Stacy....these people just don't get it....GET GOVERNMENT OUT OF OUR LIVES.....they don't get it..Is it because they're liberals?
  • kotabear Stacy F 2012/07/05 23:12:20
    kotabear
    I just think it makes it convenient for those who want it to be recognized by law that there have 3 parents in the situation.
  • Stacy F kotabear 2012/07/06 05:21:38
    Stacy F
    Exactly HOW can a child have THREE parents, aside from a step-parent due to a divorce?? One man, one woman. That's what is necessary for a child to have parents. We already have laws that stipulate that a child can have step-parents. Why in the world do we need another law? This bill is just another prime example of stupidity at play, nothing more, nothing less.
  • kotabear Stacy F 2012/07/07 14:32:46
    kotabear
    "1) A family in which a man began dating a woman while she was pregnant, then raised that child with her for seven years. The youth also had a parental relationship with the biological father. 2) A same-sex couple who asked a close male friend to help them conceive, then decided that all three would raise the child. 3) A divorce in which a woman and her second husband were the legal parents of a child, but the biological father maintained close ties as well."
  • Stacy F kotabear 2012/07/07 16:28:34
    Stacy F
    Exactly. You just proved my point. Thank you.
  • ☆ Queen... kotabear 2012/07/04 03:08:21 (edited)
    ☆ QueenAline
    recognize WHAT? that you now can have 4,5,7,9, parents? IT'S STUPID...... DUH
  • Anna 2012/07/04 01:56:55
    Yes
    Anna
    +4
    I have a mom, and dad, aa might as well be step-mom, and step-dad. Step dad didn't come until a bit later, but all three of my first parents have been a huge and great part of my life.
  • ☆ Queen... Anna 2012/07/04 02:31:20
    ☆ QueenAline
    +3
    no one is questioning or rejecting grand parents, or step parents...this bill is about legally being able to declare a child with more than 2 parents...it's just stupid.
  • Anna ☆ Queen... 2012/07/04 05:17:27
    Anna
    The bill is about declare who is considered legal parents. I'm stating that all of these people are my parents and should have the legal rights that go with the title.
  • carlos c n 2012/07/04 01:56:17 (edited)
    No
    carlos c n
    +2
    Same sex parents? Homosexuals can not "make" a baby.
  • The Libertarian 2012/07/04 01:49:58
    No
    The Libertarian
    +3
    Is it any wonder that this country has the lowest standards of education of the developed world, hell, we won't stop until every child has been transformed into a non caring, emotionless, empty shell, android.
  • emilychung 2012/07/04 01:49:23
  • No
    Jerry (Iron Priest)☮ R ☮ P ☮ 201
    +3
    What children need is a stable environment in which mom and dad stick together through thick and thin.
  • Torchmanner ~PWCM~JLA 2012/07/04 01:34:14
    No
    Torchmanner ~PWCM~JLA
    +6
    The leftards want to ruin the children's minds.
  • in vino veritas 2012/07/04 01:33:27 (edited)
    No
    in vino veritas
    +7
    One glance at American society today will tell you why its not a good idea,kids are pawns to two separating partners without others laying claim to them as well,how damn sad....
  • Wyveryx 2012/07/04 01:31:27
    No
    Wyveryx
    +4
    OMG...talk about confusing.
    So no instead of a child being reared with two parents, either a man/man or woman/woman, now it's Mommy/Mommy and Daddy? Or is it Daddy/Daddy and Mommy?
    Leave the parental rights to the parents or parent and if need be let them choose is someone is in need of temporary guardianship. We don't need another law on the books to make a bigger mess of things.
  • gocar 2012/07/04 01:25:21
    Yes
    gocar
    +4
    Let people do what they want but prosecute those doctors who helped the woman have eight babies for the tax payers to support.

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2013/05/19 23:17:51

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals