Quantcast

Is Hillary Clinton also kissing up to Muslims for monetary gain and assisting Obama selling out America?

mac9 2012/09/22 16:01:32
You!
Add Photos & Videos



One Citizen Speaking


Saying out loud what you may be thinking















« Political Correctness: It is time to stop assuming Muslims can be our friends! |
Main




September 21, 2012





Just asking: Is Hillary Clinton feathering her nest with support for the Muslim World?





It was widely assumed that there would be no official scrutiny of
Bill Clinton’s various charitable and for-profit activities while his
wife Hillary Clinton served as Barack Hussein Obama’s Secretary of
State. Even though there was great opportunity for a major conflict of
interest.

Since the various Clinton enterprises are reported to
have received multi-million dollar contributions from wealthy Arabs, is
it possible that Hillary Clinton refused to take a hard-line with the
Muslim world, fearing a reduction in Muslim money flowing to the various
Clinton enterprises. An organization which she might join after her
government service. An organization that can fund a royal lifestyle and
world-wide travel on luxury jets and yachts?

Other than following
Barack Obama’s orders, I cannot see why Hillary’s State Department
would be complicit in allowing the U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations
to openly spin the truth about the riots in Libya and the death of
American personnel.

It is well-known that petrodollars have
fueled the purchase of American companies which legally employ lobbyists
to persuade politicians and government officials to adopt their
respective agendas. Could they have bought the Obama administration? Or
could Obama be auditioning for the “historic” position as the first
American Secretary-General of the massively corrupt United Nations?

And
while I am wondering … is it possible that the Clinton Administration
has already cut a deal with the Muslim Brotherhood to release the “Blind
Sheik” who was complicit in unsuccessfully attempting to destroy the
Twin Towers the first time? Perhaps in the form of a pardon during his
lame duck session, should Mitt Romney be elected?

Bottom line …

Since
both Clintons have a great familiarity with scandal during their
occupancy of the White House, shouldn’t the American public wonder why
Obama and Clinton are soft on Muslims – who are demanding that we modify
our Constitutional guarantee of free speech or there will be more
outrage and riots?

Shouldn’t we wonder why Obama and Clinton do
not explain the concept of “freedom of speech” to those who know no such
freedom – instead of abjectly apologizing for a little-seen film which
they cannot legally control?

Shouldn’t we fear an out-of-touch,
out-of-control President during his remaining time in office –
especially if Mitt Romney is elected?














Add a comment above

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Zuggi 2012/09/22 19:18:09
    All of the above
    Zuggi
    No.

    Thank you for contributing to yet another episode of "Simple Answers to Stupid Questions".
  • mac9 Zuggi 2012/09/23 16:53:52
    mac9
    Thank you for replying with a moronic response.

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2014/11/28 00:21:55

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals