Quantcast

Is fascism the merger of the state and corporate power?

bob 2012/05/07 16:43:28
Related Topics: Merger, Fascism, Corporate
It's the Corporate State, Stupid
Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power
Individual rights and corporate rights, at the very least conflict, and often are in downright opposition to one another
Number three on Britt’s list is the identification of scapegoats or enemies as a unifying cause. Often the government itself becomes the scapegoat when the government is the regulator of the corporations. Often it is lawyers or administrators who take on
The suppression of organized labor (organized labor is the bane of corporations and the only real check on corporate power other than government or the legal system)
Supremacy of the military (it is necessary to produce and protect corporate profits abroad and threats from abroad)
Cronyism and governmental corruption (it is very beneficial to have ex-corporate employees run the agencies or make the laws that are supposed to regulate or check corporations);
Fraudulent elections (especially those where corporations run the machinery of elections and count the votes or where judges decide their outcomes);
Obsession with national security (anti-corporatists are a security risk to the corporate status quo)
Obsession with crime and punishment (anti-corporatists belong in jail)
Disdain for intellectuals and the arts (these people see corporatism for what it is and are highly individualistic).
Control of the media (propaganda works);
Undecided
All of the above
None of the above
You!
Add Photos & Videos
Add a comment above

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Odinsown 2012/05/08 00:02:42
    Undecided
    Odinsown
    Fascism is a form of socialism that tries to merge corporatism and stalinist communism.
  • jackolantyrn356 2012/05/07 22:55:29
    None of the above
    jackolantyrn356
    Facism, Communis, and all the rest of the isms are a part of Marxist and all other rw and lw groups. You are all the same pittifil little minds waitiong for the great Marxist Saviors. Stupid little punkls still waiting fdor the Glock in the back of yoiur heads
  • Chokmah 2012/05/07 21:02:00
    Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger o...
    Chokmah
    Fascism could not exist without the State, and one party rule!
  • sjalan 2012/05/07 20:27:51
    Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger o...
    sjalan
    +1
    In reality, Fascism, like that of WWII Nazi Germany, is a combination of the State Government, Corporations and Religious Coalition.

    http://www.spartacus.schoolne...
  • BIG BAD JOHN R. 2012/05/07 19:18:30
    None of the above
    BIG BAD JOHN R.
    +1
    Fascist, how close are we: TO DAMN CLOSE and if we don't watch out we will be there before you can blink your eyes. The Bush Administration, progressives watched in horror as Constitutional protections vanished, nativist rhetoric ratcheted up, hate speech turned into intimidation and violence, and the President of the United States seized for himself powers only demanded by history's worst dictators.

    That's how close we are and the more BIG BROTHER gets your power the LESS RIGHT'S YOU WILL HAVE!
    Fascist America: Are We There Yet?

    By Sara Robinson
    August 6, 2009 - 1:23am ET


    POPULAR THIS WEEK

    Paul Krugman: Ending The Depression Is Simple—Except For The Politics
    by Isaiah J. Poole
    May 02, 2012
    Stunning Income Inequality Data Of The Day
    by Digby
    May 03, 2012
    more»
    ALSO WORTH READING

    No related links for this issue category.

    All through the dark years of the Bush Administration, progressives watched in horror as Constitutional protections vanished, nativist rhetoric ratcheted up, hate speech turned into intimidation and violence, and the president of the United States seized for himself powers only demanded by history's worst dictators. With each new outrage, the small handful of us who'd made ourselves experts on right-wing culture and politics would hear once again from...

















    Fascist, how close are we: TO DAMN CLOSE and if we don't watch out we will be there before you can blink your eyes. The Bush Administration, progressives watched in horror as Constitutional protections vanished, nativist rhetoric ratcheted up, hate speech turned into intimidation and violence, and the President of the United States seized for himself powers only demanded by history's worst dictators.

    That's how close we are and the more BIG BROTHER gets your power the LESS RIGHT'S YOU WILL HAVE!
    Fascist America: Are We There Yet?

    By Sara Robinson
    August 6, 2009 - 1:23am ET


    POPULAR THIS WEEK

    Paul Krugman: Ending The Depression Is Simple—Except For The Politics
    by Isaiah J. Poole
    May 02, 2012
    Stunning Income Inequality Data Of The Day
    by Digby
    May 03, 2012
    more»
    ALSO WORTH READING

    No related links for this issue category.

    All through the dark years of the Bush Administration, progressives watched in horror as Constitutional protections vanished, nativist rhetoric ratcheted up, hate speech turned into intimidation and violence, and the president of the United States seized for himself powers only demanded by history's worst dictators. With each new outrage, the small handful of us who'd made ourselves experts on right-wing culture and politics would hear once again from worried readers: Is this it? Have we finally become a fascist state? Are we there yet?
    And every time this question got asked, people like Chip Berlet and Dave Neiwert and Fred Clarkson and yours truly would look up from our maps like a parent on a long drive, and smile a wan smile of reassurance. "Wellll...we're on a bad road, and if we don't change course, we could end up there soon enough. But there's also still plenty of time and opportunity to turn back. Watch, but don't worry. As bad as this looks: no -- we are not there yet."
    In tracking the mileage on this trip to perdition, many of us relied on the work of historian Robert Paxton, who is probably the world's pre-eminent scholar on the subject of how countries turn fascist. In a 1998 paper published in The Journal of Modern History, Paxton argued that the best way to recognize emerging fascist movements isn't by their rhetoric, their politics, or their aesthetics. Rather, he said, mature democracies turn fascist by a recognizable process, a set of five stages that may be the most important family resemblance that links all the whole motley collection of 20th Century fascisms together. According to our reading of Paxton's stages, we weren't there yet. There were certain signs -- one in particular -- we were keeping an eye out for, and we just weren't seeing it.
    And now we are. In fact, if you know what you're looking for, it's suddenly everywhere. It's odd that I haven't been asked for quite a while; but if you asked me today, I'd tell you that if we're not there right now, we've certainly taken that last turn into the parking lot and are now looking for a space. Either way, our fascist American future now looms very large in the front windshield -- and those of us who value American democracy need to understand how we got here, what's changing now, and what's at stake in the very near future if these people are allowed to win -- or even hold their ground.
    What is fascism?
    The word has been bandied about by so many people so wrongly for so long that, as Paxton points out, "Everybody is somebody else's fascist." Given that, I always like to start these conversations by revisiting Paxton's essential definition of the term:



    Fascism: While none of those examples are completely fascist, if they involved the lost of rights leading to a more authoritarian state or the enhancement of the elitists in a capitalistic society then we shall consider the label appropriate. After all fascism comes in various degrees or flavors just as democracy has.

    No term generates more confusion or misunderstanding than fascism. It has been applied to people like McCarthy, Hoover, government policies and governments themselves. Exactly what is fascism? It is a totalitarian system of government that bases its economy on capitalism. While none of those examples are completely fascist, if they involved the lost of rights leading to a more authoritarian state or the enhancement of the elitists in a capitalistic society then we shall consider the label appropriate. After all fascism comes in various degrees or flavors just as democracy does. Further it took Hitler over a decade before he attained full power. Fascism and capitalism are inseparable. Notice how the corporate power structure is authoritarian and is geared to reward the elite owners but not the workers.

    Leon Trotsky in a brilliant pamphlet first described Fascism. This description of fascism in and of itself is not noteworthy and has been expanded by several others, but the analysis of the evolution of a capitalistic society into a fascist society was brilliantly prophetic. We have already alluded to the fact that Hitler attained his power gradually and no rebellion or revolution was required, this is what makes fascism so insidious and dangerous. It is just a natural degenerative process of a capitalistic society. Likewise, Mussolini also attained power not through rebellion or revolution but through what could be termed a loud march or strike, a riot would simply be an overstatement of the facts. This paper will examine the creeping fascism present in the US and where it may lead if it's unchecked. We shall define creeping fascism as the lost of individual rights or the enhancement of the rights of the elite and corporations containing one or more elements of fascist behavior as defined by past philosophers of fascism or as defined by past behavior of fascist regimes. But first we must look at the evolution of governments and define exactly what fascism involves.




    HILTER AND HIS THIRD RIKE
    (more)
  • Savior 2012/05/07 18:01:41 (edited)
    None of the above
    Savior
    +2
    Fascist comes from the latin word Fasces, which means " a bundle of sticks", it was used by a number of people from the Italian Socialist Party as a metaphor for what they wanted for Italy, all of the individual sticks which can be broken 1 by 1 tied together in a huge collectivist bundle. Fascists believe in political violence to achieve their ends (hey! just like OWS), Fascists are totally opposed to free market capitalism (hey! just like OWS), Fascist believe in a powerful state regulated economy, and the only business they approve of are one's that are under the direct thumb or completely dependent on the government.

    So at the end of the day Fascist is just another word for Socialist.
  • nightcr... Savior 2012/05/07 18:41:27
    nightcrawler2005
    +1
    Great Comment and how true.
  • Sofahead 2012/05/07 17:34:30
    None of the above
    Sofahead
    Do you ever research any of these topics before posting them?
    Many like this one come off as half-baked and inane.
    The only consistant thread through these is to relentlessly bash Conservatives, Republicans, and Big Business. There is an also glaring absence of promoting why positive reason why anyone should care about being Liberal, and Democratic.

    Democrats seem to have this reputation of throwing out social programs as entitlements for the poor, the lazy, criminals, and illegal immigrants, which none of these threads do nothing to disspell.
  • EdVenture 2012/05/07 17:21:27 (edited)
    None of the above
    EdVenture
    +1
    With an Imperialistic/plutocratic flair.
  • Keith 2012/05/07 17:11:08
    None of the above
    Keith
    +1
    fas·cism   /ˈfæʃɪzəm/ Show Spelled[fash-iz-uhm] Show IPA
    noun
    1. ( sometimes initial capital letter ) a governmental system led by a dictator having complete power, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc., and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism.
    2. ( sometimes initial capital letter ) the philosophy, principles, or methods of fascism.
    3. ( initial capital letter ) a fascist movement, especially the one established by Mussolini in Italy 1922–43.

    -- http://dictionary.reference.c...
  • Mark In Irvine 2012/05/07 17:06:36
    All of the above
    Mark In Irvine
    +2
    it is all of the fracking above!
  • psiEnergos 2012/05/07 17:00:27
    None of the above
    psiEnergos
    Well, somebody needed to vent. Fascism, if you wanted to say was a mix of 'this and that' would be closer to 'racism and nationalism'. Many things you put here could be associated with many other dictatorial forms of government as well and not just Fascism.

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2013/05/22 10:09:37

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals