Is election fraud going to change the outcome of this election?
|
|
|||||
|
27 votes
|
|
59% | |||
|
3 votes
|
|
7% | |||
|
5 votes
|
|
11% | |||
|
11 votes
|
|
24% | |||
The numbers of fraudulent voters is significant, in the millions, including dead dogs, dead people and illegals.
Voter fraud is the big issue that may decide the outcome of this election
In Seattle, Wash., last month, Brenda Charlston received a voter
registration form in the mail from the Voter Participation Center with
all the blanks filled in for “Rosie Charlston,” her black Labrador who
died in 1998.
The Obama supporting center says it has mailed some 5 million forms
using commercially available databases to target Democratic-leaning
groups such as unmarried women. What did they use in the Brenda/Rosie
mailing? The dead dog mailing list?
In June, in Buford County, Va., Tim Morris received a filled-out
voter registration form for “Mozart Morris” addressed to “Mo,” his dog
that passed away two years before. Again, the form came in the mail from
the Voter Participation Center.
In Bernalillo County, N.M., an anonymous Republican registered his
dog as a voter at a voter registration booth at the University of New
Mexico to show how easy it would be to defraud the system. Election
officials claim they followed the law and referred the case to state
prosecutors for criminal investigation of the dog owner!
Election officials throughout the country report a surge of voter registrations from animals, dead people and noncitizens.
Republicans believe Obama is depending on these registrations to win
the election and want laws requiring voter ID at the polls. Democrats
charge that Republicans are trying to suppress the vote to increase the
odds of a Romney win.
This Democrat charge formed the basis of a lawsuit by Obama’s
Department of Justice to block a Texas law that requires voter photo ID
to vote. Texas is one of 26 states with such laws.
The DOJ claimed the requirement would bar eligible voters from voting
and that the cost of getting the proper ID amounted to a “poll tax.”
The Texas law provides for a free state ID to anyone lacking a driver’s
license or other photo ID.
A study by a DOJ expert produced a long list of Texans who lacked
government-issued photo ID and, it was alleged, were thereby
disenfranchised. The list and the study were a fraud.
The list turned out to contain the names of 50,000 dead people,
330,377 seniors who can vote by mail without ID, 261,887 voters who
included a driver’s license number on their voter registration form,
800,000 Texans who were, in fact, registered to vote and who did have a
government issued photo ID.
The list also contained the names of Texans with U.S. military ID
(acceptable for photo ID to vote), former Texas residents who had moved
to other states, disabled voters who were exempt from the Texas photo ID
law and noncitizens.
Strangely, the list of those who “lacked government issued ID”
included former President George W. Bush, two state legislators and the
wife of another, former U.S. Sen. Phil Gramm, current U.S. Sen. Kay
Bailey Hutchison and even the Texas director of elections, Keith Ingram –
who was listed not once but twice!
However, even the Texas attorney general has yet to find the names of any dogs, living or dead, on the list.
Obama’s DOJ also went after Florida for passing a similar law. It
seems that Obama voters who were dead, felons or noncitizens would not
get to vote.
Florida Gov. Rick Scott ordered county election officials to examine
the integrity of the voting rolls. In the first review, the names of
83,000 dead people were discovered still registered to vote.
The dead deserve representation given the estate-tax debate, but the law does not yet allow them to vote.
DOJ also objected to Florida’s insistence that felons be barred from voting.
Noncitizens were also found on the voter rolls, and Gov. Scott fought
to get access to the federal Systematic Alien Verification for
Entitlements, or SAVE, database. SAVE will allow Florida to purge the
voter roll of noncitizens.
In a strange, parallel world, the Obama Agriculture Department
requires ID on every cow, and now on every chicken, on every American
farm.
Obama wants to trace the movement of farm animals but not illegal
aliens; he wants to ID every farm animal to protect the public health
but does not want to ID voters to protect the integrity of elections.
With the memory still fresh that the 2000 presidential election was
decided by a handful of voters in Florida, the determination of who gets
to vote in 2012 could decide who will be the next president.
Top Opinion
-
Temlakos~POTL~PWCM~JLA~☆ 2012/07/16 14:42:31Yes they are planning to corrupt this election.
+7And now we know why Holder is fighting so hard against attempts to clean out the dead, the non-citizens, and the pets from the voter rolls.
The significant frauds that may happen are mostly attempts to prevent eligible people from voting.
Election fraud has been around for a long time and not sure
they even want to do anything about it.
But what difference does it make? The "Corporations" have already bought both sides,
so unless we bring in along shot, the near future is already planned...
http://webstation19.8k.com/20...
Doc. 6
Filed & Entered: 07/05/2012
Response in Opposition to Motion
Docket Text: OPPOSITION to EX PARTE APPLICATION to Intervene[4] filed by Defendants Amanda Adkins, Alabama Republican Party, Alaska Republican Party, Allen Alley, Arizona Republican Party, Arkansas Republican Party, Bill Armistead, Tom Del Beccaro, Mike Benito, Robert T Bennett, Pat Brady, California Republican Party, Ryan Call, David Chang, David Cole, Colorado Republican Committee, Chad Connelly, Brad Courtney, Edward F Cox, Lenny Curry, Delaware State Republican Party, Wes Deschamps, Chris Devaney, District of Columbia Republican Party, Does, Sue P Everhart, Mark Fahleson, Gov Benigno Fitial, Georgia Republican Party, Rob Gleason, Hawaii Republican Party, Robin Hayes, Eric Holcomb, Tammy Hooper, Illinois Republican Party, Indiana Republican Party, Bob Kabel, Jerry Labriola Jr, Jack Lindley, Wayne MacDonald, Robert Maginn, Maine Republican Party, Massachusetts Republican Party, Michael McDonald, Hon Carlos Mendez, Michigan Republican Party, Mississippi Republican Party, Missouri Republican Party, Montana Republican Party, Alex X Mooney, Tom Morrissey, Hon Pat Mullins, Steve Munsteri, Nebraska Republican Party, Nevada Republican Party, New ...
&
&
&
Doc. 6
Filed & Entered: 07/05/2012
Response in Opposition to Motion
Docket Text: OPPOSITION to EX PARTE APPLICATION to Intervene[4] filed by Defendants Amanda Adkins, Alabama Republican Party, Alaska Republican Party, Allen Alley, Arizona Republican Party, Arkansas Republican Party, Bill Armistead, Tom Del Beccaro, Mike Benito, Robert T Bennett, Pat Brady, California Republican Party, Ryan Call, David Chang, David Cole, Colorado Republican Committee, Chad Connelly, Brad Courtney, Edward F Cox, Lenny Curry, Delaware State Republican Party, Wes Deschamps, Chris Devaney, District of Columbia Republican Party, Does, Sue P Everhart, Mark Fahleson, Gov Benigno Fitial, Georgia Republican Party, Rob Gleason, Hawaii Republican Party, Robin Hayes, Eric Holcomb, Tammy Hooper, Illinois Republican Party, Indiana Republican Party, Bob Kabel, Jerry Labriola Jr, Jack Lindley, Wayne MacDonald, Robert Maginn, Maine Republican Party, Massachusetts Republican Party, Michael McDonald, Hon Carlos Mendez, Michigan Republican Party, Mississippi Republican Party, Missouri Republican Party, Montana Republican Party, Alex X Mooney, Tom Morrissey, Hon Pat Mullins, Steve Munsteri, Nebraska Republican Party, Nevada Republican Party, New Jersey Republican Party, Monty Newman, North Carolina Republican Party, North Dakota Republican Party, Joe Nosef, Ohio Republican Party, Oklahoma Republican Party, Oregon Republican Party, Matt Pinnell, Reince Priebus, Mayor Samuel Raia, Tim Rave, Republican National Committee, Republican Party of Kentucky, Republican Party of American Samoa, Republican Party of Connecticut, Republican Party of Florida, Republican Party of Guam, Republican Party of Idaho, Republican Party of Iowa, Republican Party of Kansas, Republican Party of Louisiana, Republican Party of Maryland, Republican Party of Minnesota, Republican Party of New Hampshire, Republican Party of New Mexico, Republican Party of New York State, Republican Party of Pennsylvania, Republican Party of Puerto Rico, Republican Party of Virginia, Republican Party of West Virginia, Republican Party of Wisconsin, Republican Party of Wyoming, Republican Party of the Northern Marianas Islands, Rhode Island Republican Party, Steve Robertson, Randy Ruedrich, Robert Schostak, Norm Semanko, Pat Shortridge, John Sigler, South Carolina Republican Party, South Dakota Republican Party, AJ Spiker, Stan Stein, Matt Strawm, Mike Stuart, Tennessee Republican Party, Texas Republican Party, Mr. Victor Tofaeono, Utah Republican Party, Vermont Republican Party, Roger Villere, Washington State Republican Party, Doyle Webb, Charlie Webster, Kirby Wilbur, Thomas Wright, Mark Zaccaria. (Bell, Charles)
RNC Response in Opposition to Motion - Doc. 6. - https://docs.google.com/open?...
Doc. 7
Filed & Entered: 07/05/2012
Motion to Dismiss Case
Docket Text: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendants Amanda Adkins, Alabama Republican Party, Alaska Republican Party, Allen Alley, Arizona Republican Party, Arkansas Republican Party, Bill Armistead, Tom Del Beccaro, Mike Benito, Robert T Bennett, Pat Brady, California Republican Party, Ryan Call, David Chang, David Cole, Colorado Republican Committee, Chad Connelly, Brad Courtney, Edward F Cox, Lenny Curry, Delaware State Republican Party, Wes Deschamps, Chris Devaney, District of Columbia Republican Party, Does, Sue P Everhart, Mark Fahleson, Gov Benigno Fitial, Georgia Republican Party, Rob Gleason, Hawaii Republican Party, Robin Hayes, Eric Holcomb, Tammy Hooper, Illinois Republican Party, Indiana Republican Party, Bob Kabel, Jerry Labriola Jr, Jack Lindley, Wayne MacDonald, Robert Maginn, Maine Republican Party, Massachusetts Republican Party, Michael McDonald, Hon Carlos Mendez, Michigan Republican Party, Mississippi Republican Party, Missouri Republican Party, Montana Republican Party, Alex X Mooney. Motion set for hearing on 8/6/2012 at 08:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit to Motion to Dismiss, # (2) Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss)(Bell, Charles)
Notice of Motion - Doc. 7 - https://docs.google.com/open?...
Attachment A to Notice of Motion - Doc. 7-1 - https://docs.google.com/open?...
Memo of Law to Notice of Motion - Doc. 7-2 https://docs.google.com/open?...
Doc. 11.
Filed & Entered: 07/11/2012
Notice (Other)
https://docs.google.com/open?...
Doc. 12
Filed: 07/10/2012
Entered: 07/12/2012
Amended Complaint
Docket Text: FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendants Delegates to the Republican National Convention amending Complaint - [1]; filed by plaintiffs Delegates to the Republican National Convention (rla) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/12/2012: # (1) SUMMONS ISSUED) (rla).
FAC - Doc. 12 - https://docs.google.com/open?...
Doc. 13
Filed & Entered: 07/12/2012
Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held
Docket Text: MINUTE IN CHAMBERS by Judge David O. Carter: Order Reinstating Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and Setting Briefing Schedule. Plaintiff shall file an Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 7) on or before noon on July 20, 2012. Defendants shall file a Reply, if at all, on or before noon on July 27, 2012. The Court does not alter the hearing date of 8:30 a.m. on August 6, 2012. (mt)
Minute Oder - Doc. 13 - https://docs.google.com/open?...
Romney is the presumptive nominee? How much more corrupt can it get? How much more evidence do you need? You are being told who you can vote for whether you like it or not.
Eric Holder isn't with the Democratic National Committee...He is the Attorney General of the United States....Wouldn't want the easily confused to stay that way...so let's correct what you said there.
If the republicans hate regulations so much....why this one? I mean...typically they say, "If'n we could git the Guberment outta da way, everyone would be better off."
The reason....is more voters...more democrats vote. That is the true problem...in this faux issue created by republicans...normally they like the status quo....but not when they could back door Jim Crow you...AGAIN! Let's not let this happen. We should encourage all to vote...even if your neighbor has to vouch for you. No ID has been needed in the past...Why now?
Well here is the truth....so you can stop lying.
I want to be clear here....registering Mickey Mouse or Joe Montana in Nebraska does not constitute voter fraud...nor does registering dead people to vote per se.
Voter fraud is when someone votes in 2 different places or votes under a name that is not their own....and these are rare instances.
Curing corruption in the system will not be solved by voter ID.