Is Congress getting dumber?
|
|
|||||
|
8 votes
|
|
62% | |||
|
1 vote
|
|
8% | |||
|
2 votes
|
|
15% | |||
|
2 votes
|
|
15% | |||
The Capitol Building in Washington, D.C.
Think members of Congress act like a bunch of high school students? You might be on to something. A recent study from the Sunlight Foundation found that members of Congress tend to speak at about a 10th-grade level.
The Sunlight Foundation analyzed
every word spoken by every member of Congress on the floor of the House
or Senate. Sunlight imported the words into a searchable database and
then "ran them through an algorithm to determine the grade level of
congressional discourse," according to a buzzy story from NPR.
The finding: Congress is speaking
at a lower academic level. Back in 2005, members of Congress spoke at a
level equal to a high school junior. Now, the numbers have dropped off.
Congress talks like a bunch of sophomores. Sunlight used something
called the "Flesch-Kinkaid" scale to determine speech level. Longer
sentences and words with more syllables equal higher grade levels.
Some interesting factoids from the Sunlight Foundation's study:
—"Prior to 2005, Republicans on
average spoke at a slightly higher grade level than Democrats. Since
then, Democrats have spoken on average at a slightly higher grade level
than Republicans."
—On average, Congress members who are moderate speak at a higher level. Those on the far right and left speak at a lower level.
—Don't assume you speak at a higher level than your representative. The
average American speaks between an eighth- and ninth-grade level.
It is tempting to see these results and say, "Congress is getting dumber," but a piece from the Atlantic suggests another theory.
Perhaps Congress is just getting better at getting its points across.
After all, why make an issue or speech or anecdote more complicated than
it has to be?
Read More: http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/upshot/congress-gettin...
- Janet C K 2012/07/16 18:11:28Undecided+1Considering Harry Reid has so much control over what OUR REPRESENTITIVES try to pass, and Nevada and California keep sending these freaks back into power, it makes you wonder. We should be like the United Nations, and be able to vote to disqualify crazy stupid states that are parasitic....or sanction their voting influence until they balance their budgets.reply
-
I like that ideareply - Janet C K Headhun... 2012/07/16 18:15:20
+1OR, how about give EXTRA influence to those that rely less on the Federal Government, and balance their budgets!reply - Janet C K Janet C K 2012/07/16 18:16:02
+1ooooo....a new poll idea!reply -
not surprisedreply -
As usual I like the way you think.reply - Janet C K Headhun... 2012/07/16 18:26:53
back at ya! ;)reply - FumbDuck 2012/05/25 22:27:31None of the aboveCongress is not getting dumber they are more greedy now than ever and they think " we the people " are getting dumber. Every single last one of them needs to be replaced with someone new, so do all elected representatives in every state, city, county, berg, whatever until ALL of them have been replaced and if the new people don't represent you then vote them out also until " we " vote some people in who " get it " and actually represent " us. "reply
- John Galt jr or Ron/jon 2012/05/24 03:53:09Yes but...............+1it's because they are buying their own propaganda...reply
- Margaret Jacobson 2012/05/22 15:59:48Undecided+1They are getting DUMBER than dumb, because they think WE are the dumbies......our real problem is there NO middle class people running for office...........Everyone in congress "comes from money"........they enact laws that most people REALLY DO NOT WANT !! and we keep reelecting them !!!reply
- DoxieDad 2012/05/22 02:55:43Yes but...............+1
reply - S and S 2012/05/22 02:29:09Yes but...............+1YES NO but!!!.... my f--king rep voted for HR347 and NDAA!!!!reply
- mal 2012/05/21 22:32:07None of the above+1Most were not that smart to begin with.reply
- Katfish 2012/05/21 21:33:00No but.....................+1They understand that information is more available as far as floor speeches to the public. There is also a bit more public involvement than in the past. The public has a desire to comprehend what is being said. I wish the legislation would be written in a simular method. Complex issues do not nessesarily need to be solved with "big words".reply
-
+1While that is somewhat true. Can you really depend on undereducated voters to learn the information. We are a nation that is becoming dependent on sound nites and tweets with a short attention span.reply - Katfish Headhun... 2012/05/21 22:11:28
I am in no means saying that the average undereducated voter is able to comprehend all that is nessesary to make fully informed public policy decision but what I am saying is that the less complex the wording is the better chance they have to understand it. The explanations dont nessesarily need to be "shorter" just a bit more layman.reply - Lee The Hybrid Snowflake 2012/05/21 21:00:23Yes but...............+1It's because they're too old!reply
-
+1Hell I am as old as some of them and older even than some. Yet I still prefer to communicate at a higher level than a sophomore in HSreply - Lee The... Headhun... 2012/05/22 00:57:16
LOL You couldn't possibly be as old as some of those guys, you're far too hip! =0 )reply - Nawjoo 2012/05/21 19:51:47
-
+1Sorry about the but I mean to put add comment.reply















