Quantcast

Is bipartisanship when not a single republican votes FOR Pres. Obama's stimulus bill while 11 Democrats vote AGAINST it?

martygrn 2009/01/29 04:11:34
You!
Add Photos & Videos
NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- The House on Wednesday evening passed an $819 billion economic stimulus package Wednesday on a party-line vote, despite President Obama's efforts to achieve bipartisan support for the bill.

The final vote was 244 to 188. No Republicans voted for the bill, while 11 Democrats voted against it.

The Senate is likely to take up the bill next week.

"I hope that we can continue to strengthen this plan before it gets to my desk," Obama said in a statement after the vote. "We must move swiftly and boldly to put Americans back to work, and that is exactly what this plan begins to do."

In floor debate earlier, House Democrats offered near-unanimous support for the bill, touting the package's ability to quickly create jobs and jumpstart economic growth.

"One week and one day ago, our new President delivered a great inaugural address ... which I believe is a great blueprint for the future," said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif. "With swift and bold action today, we are doing just that -- with this vote today, we are taking America in a new direction."

But Republicans, who are outnumbered in the House, have pushed back, expressing concern about the large amount of spending in the bill, and have criticized the tax cut provisions for not going far enough.

"The underlying bill, while it has some good provisions, has a lot of wasteful provisions and slow-moving spending in it," said House Minority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio. "We have to act -- we have to heal the ailing economy. The question is how to do it best; we think that fast-acting tax relief is the way to get it done."

The House voted down a Republican amendment, which would have cut a significant portion of the bill's spending and greatly expanded the amount of tax cuts in the bill.

Obama spent much of his first week as president rallying support for the bill. After meeting with congressional leadership of both parties on Friday, he met with Republican congressional leaders on Tuesday and a dozen CEOs on Wednesday.

Obama and House Democrats etched out plans for a stimulus package in the weeks leading up to the president's inauguration. Two House committees amended and added some provisions, resulting in $607 billion in direct pending and appropriations and $212 billion in tax cuts.

The fact that 11 Democrats voted against the House package is significant, said Dan Clifton, the head of policy research at Strategas Research Partners.

"First, it gives Republicans cover," Clifton said. "And it gives extreme leverage to the Senate."

Next week, the full Senate will vote on its version, which differs in some significant ways from the House bill. The two chambers will then need to reconcile their differences before each vote on the final version. To pass the package in the Senate, Democrats will need 60 votes -- meaning at least two Republicans.

Senate passage is expected, Clifton said. "But it's a question of whether you get 60 votes or 80 votes."

Congress has put the legislation on a fast track, as many lawmakers on both sides of the aisle agree that swift action is needed to help pull the economy out of a deep recession. Both Democratic and Republican leaders have said they aim to get the bill to Obama's desk for him to sign before lawmakers' Presidents Day recess in mid-February.

http://money.cnn.com/2009/01/28/news/economy/house_vote_wedne...

Now, in my opinion, it says a lot about this package if 11 members of the Presidents own party voted against the bill while not a single member in the opposing party voted for it. What does this say about our new era of "bipartisanship"?
Add a comment above

Top Opinion

  • americanpatriot 2009/01/29 04:15:30
    11 Dems switched which means this is a bad idea because....
    americanpatriot
    +3
    AND it means that the REPUBLICANS did NOT CAVE and Sell their SOULS. Who knew they were capable of voting with their conscience despite Obama trying to force them to cross over, trying to woo them, trying to bribe them with LUNCH? TELLING THEM they better STOP listening to Rush Limbaugh?
    Hey you know what?
    FUCK OBAMA and FUCK PELOSI and her Five kids and SIx grandkids, they who want to KILL THE REST OF AMERICA'S BABIES?
    Burn in hell.

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • TWISTER61 2009/01/29 05:01:24
    11 Dems switched which means this is a bad idea because....
    TWISTER61
    +2
    America will not allow DICTATOR OBAMA to rule! You stupid libs voted in this MUSLIM who kills babies,and will release his MUSLIM brothers to kill more americans! Proud of yourself you moron libs!
  • Willl 2009/01/29 04:55:32
    None of the above
    Willl
    +1
    To all, the so called "stimulus package" is your money, as long as you pay taxes. Furthermore; it is your children and grand-children money. That is what we are spending in this "stimulus package", and the previous ones.
    Do you really believe that funneling your money for birth control, will create prosperity to our nation?
    Republicans have a valid point. It is just wasting of our (whoever, still has a job) money.
  • darklighter 2009/01/29 04:28:40
    11 Dems switched which means this is a bad idea because....
    darklighter
    +2
    This isn't a stimulus bill. Its a bunch of Democrat payouts to all the organizations that support it with election funding. Its a huge (nearly an entire years expenditure of the entire government) waste of money for pork projects and payouts disguised as a stimulus bill and nearly a 3rd of it will not even hit the economy before 2010 anyway. HOW many times do we as a people have to learn the lesson of the left? they clobber business and industry with taxes and regulations then scream it's not their fault when the economy crashes. Then a Republican gains control, cuts taxes and the economy takes off like a rocket. This crappy spending bill will only devalue the dollar and trigger Carter era inflation and economic stagnation. A better plan would be to lower corporate taxes, lower small business taxes and eliminate altogether the tax on foreign investment. There is over 13trillion in US currency trapped in foreign markets because the FED takes so much of it when it comes back to the US. it wasn't earned here, it shouldn't be taxed here and it could jump start our economy far faster than printing money to cover the largest single bill ever written. I mean, that bill will come from the economy in the form of higher taxes, its not government money, its YOUR money being spent on Congressional favors. You don't kick start the economy by taking 800 billion out of future revenue.
  • CornerBlitz 2009/01/29 04:23:40
    11 Dems switched which means this is a bad idea because....
    CornerBlitz
    What do you expect? I mean seriously.
  • Gracie - Proud Conservative 2009/01/29 04:15:53
    11 Dems switched which means this is a bad idea because....
    Gracie - Proud Conservative
    +2
    Finally I'm proud of the Republicans. One was my Congresswoman. She's the best. Bi-partisanship to the Democrats means that the Republicans voted for their bill.
  • americanpatriot 2009/01/29 04:15:30
    11 Dems switched which means this is a bad idea because....
    americanpatriot
    +3
    AND it means that the REPUBLICANS did NOT CAVE and Sell their SOULS. Who knew they were capable of voting with their conscience despite Obama trying to force them to cross over, trying to woo them, trying to bribe them with LUNCH? TELLING THEM they better STOP listening to Rush Limbaugh?
    Hey you know what?
    FUCK OBAMA and FUCK PELOSI and her Five kids and SIx grandkids, they who want to KILL THE REST OF AMERICA'S BABIES?
    Burn in hell.

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2013/06/19 00:01:30

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals