
Add a comment above
Top Opinion
-
angelbaby 2012/06/28 15:27:14Not anymore, Obama has changed that........


















The socialist cause escalated with the formation of the federal reserve and REALLY escalated during FDR's reign, then with Johnson's reign. And much as I have loved both Presidents Bush, they didn't help our freedoms either when they recognized Agenda 21. But Obama has worked his czars' butts off eliminating one freedom after another. And bear in mind that all laws are made to RESTRICT some group's freedoms. Only a very few are good laws.
Today should be made into a day of grieving across the country. I suggest everyone start wearing a black armband and waving a black flag out your car window.
Otherwise - your just another prisoner.
under the losership of a candidate who was elected on a dream
by clueless dreamers,schemers,cons,and liars.I smell a child of upper middle class persuasion,how lovely:)
"The recession {started by Bush and prolonged by OBSTRUCTIONIST Republicans voted in by the wacky Tea Party (my quote)} caused the greatest upheaval among the middle class. Only roughly half of middle-class Americans remained on the same economic rung during the downturn, the Fed found. Their median net worth — the value of assets such as homes, automobiles and stocks minus any debt — suffered the biggest drops. By contrast, the wealthiest families’ median net worth rose slightly.
While the rich have gotten richer the poor have gotten poorer and the middle class has been annihilated. But more to the point - how has the middle class died and the rich gained wealth the last three years? Simple. The Government Gave Them Money.
That's right kids. For all their self-starter let the market do as it may rhetoric, when push came to shove the plutocrats took the bailouts. Did I say took bailouts? I meant extorted the bailouts through terrorism - it was a crisis, it was an emergency, and the classic Bernanke line "we might not have an economy on Monday." Spooky language. Things get serious when rich people get in trouble now however it is just the 99% who a...
"The recession {started by Bush and prolonged by OBSTRUCTIONIST Republicans voted in by the wacky Tea Party (my quote)} caused the greatest upheaval among the middle class. Only roughly half of middle-class Americans remained on the same economic rung during the downturn, the Fed found. Their median net worth — the value of assets such as homes, automobiles and stocks minus any debt — suffered the biggest drops. By contrast, the wealthiest families’ median net worth rose slightly.
While the rich have gotten richer the poor have gotten poorer and the middle class has been annihilated. But more to the point - how has the middle class died and the rich gained wealth the last three years? Simple. The Government Gave Them Money.
That's right kids. For all their self-starter let the market do as it may rhetoric, when push came to shove the plutocrats took the bailouts. Did I say took bailouts? I meant extorted the bailouts through terrorism - it was a crisis, it was an emergency, and the classic Bernanke line "we might not have an economy on Monday." Spooky language. Things get serious when rich people get in trouble now however it is just the 99% who are in trouble - no reason to panic.
But TARP {under Bush (my quote)} is perhaps the most obvious betrayal of stated principles in the history of Neoliberalism; a total market failure (that's not supposed to happen), rewarding the violation of property rights (fraud in mortgage securities market), and the use of taxpayer money to pick economic winners (cronyism). The Neoliberal experiment failed and all the happy love letters written by the established powers to free market capitalism and all the snooty justifications those same powers made to the poor as to why they should be in charge were comprehensively invalidated. The ideology was obliterated. But what remained was the 1%'s will to power, so damn the rules and take all you can get.
It started with TARP but it wouldn't end there because this wasn't about stabilizing markets this was about a group retaining its power. Because they own the country and no eventuality was tolerable that did not leave them in the dominant position. That is why bailouts stopped once the 1% were secure, the "emergency" was over because the owners were back in control and impoverishing the rest of the country was acceptable. For some impoverishing the 99% may have even been preferable. One wonders the deals the bailed out plutocrats are getting right now on formerly middle class assets - assets lost in a crisis the plutocrats on Wall Street created. What a country.
So now its on to breaking unions to drive down wages and privatize government services because then the only way to survive will be to borrow money as Neo-Feudalism takes hold with the rich living off their rents and their puppets in both parties watching the store in D.C. It is truly the dawn of a new era."
http://www.dailykos.com/story...
: } back at 'cha.
Yes, we are a nation of more opportunity, but we are also a nation of compassion...at least we use to be.
Thanks, but I have my own shoes. It is hard, however, to pull yourself up by your own boot straps when you don't have boots. To look at those poor children and deny them that is abhorent.
Guess I touched a nerve, too bad I didn't touch your heart...