Indiana Sheriff Wants House To House Control
Teri- Oregon
2012/06/14 04:30:35
According to Newton County
Sheriff, Don Hartman Sr., random house to house searches are now
possible and could be helpful following the Barnes v. STATE of INDIANA
Supreme Court ruling issued on May 12th, 2011. When asked
three separate times due to the astounding callousness as it relates to
trampling the inherent natural rights of Americans, he emphatically
indicated that he would use random house to house checks, adding he
felt people will welcome random searches if it means capturing a
criminal.
http://oathkeepers.org/oath/2011/05/19/rally-input/
And we did hold that rally for the young Marine, because there but for the grace of God go I:
Sheriff, Don Hartman Sr., random house to house searches are now
possible and could be helpful following the Barnes v. STATE of INDIANA
Supreme Court ruling issued on May 12th, 2011. When asked
three separate times due to the astounding callousness as it relates to
trampling the inherent natural rights of Americans, he emphatically
indicated that he would use random house to house checks, adding he
felt people will welcome random searches if it means capturing a
criminal.
Now,
it seems that this new Indiana law is meant to merely put the people
of Indiana back where they were, and where the common law right of
Englishmen and Americans was, for 600 years. Stewart Rhodes is
reviewing the new law and will give his thoughts on the show. However,
we do think that the ancient common law right made sense and is
consistent with the sanctity of the home and the right to bear arms.
Otherwise, if a home-owner were to resist what he or she thought was
criminal home invasion, and it later turned out to be the police
conducting an unlawful entry, that home-owner could be sent to prison
just for defending themselves against what they thought was a criminal
home invasion. It is a recipe for disaster, ending up in situations
like this:
it seems that this new Indiana law is meant to merely put the people
of Indiana back where they were, and where the common law right of
Englishmen and Americans was, for 600 years. Stewart Rhodes is
reviewing the new law and will give his thoughts on the show. However,
we do think that the ancient common law right made sense and is
consistent with the sanctity of the home and the right to bear arms.
Otherwise, if a home-owner were to resist what he or she thought was
criminal home invasion, and it later turned out to be the police
conducting an unlawful entry, that home-owner could be sent to prison
just for defending themselves against what they thought was a criminal
home invasion. It is a recipe for disaster, ending up in situations
like this:
http://oathkeepers.org/oath/2011/05/19/rally-input/
How
will you know if the man or men beating down your door are murdering
home invaders or police, when they both can just come in as they
please, with no concern for the law? The home invading criminals will
soon learn that it REALLY pays to dress like cops if people are
conditioned to let police enter their homes whenever, and for whatever
they want.
will you know if the man or men beating down your door are murdering
home invaders or police, when they both can just come in as they
please, with no concern for the law? The home invading criminals will
soon learn that it REALLY pays to dress like cops if people are
conditioned to let police enter their homes whenever, and for whatever
they want.
And we did hold that rally for the young Marine, because there but for the grace of God go I:
Top Opinion
-
john Kills 2012/06/14 05:38:21
+5Come in my house like that and they will be shot and their body armor won't stop what I keep loaded and ready for such an invasion. Keep in mind that if you stand up to them you will be shot and probably killed. They will be coming with three or more and you can't get them all. By God I will at least get 2 before I go down.
The Constitution supersedes all Federal, State and Local (including International or U.N. laws that are already unconstitutional in and of themselves) laws that are in contempt of it! And this is DEFINITELY in contempt of the Constitution right here!