Incompitano Admits Terrorists Are Crossing our Southern Border "From time to time!"
A National Drug Intelligence Center (NDIC) report
released in March 2010 stated that there have been no documented cases
of terrorists illegally entering the United States across the Mexican
border.
But Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano
has contradicted that assertion with an admission that terrorists do
cross the border “from time to time” with intent to attack Americans.
At a July 25 hearing of the House Homeland
Security Committee, Rep. Ron Barber, D-Ariz., asked Napolitano: “As you
know, Madam Secretary, there have been anecdotal reports about material
evidence of the presence of terrorists along our southern border. My
question is, is there any credible evidence that these reports are
accurate and that terrorists are, in fact, crossing our southern border
with the intent to do harm to the American people?”
Napolitano answered: “With respect, there have
been from time to time, and we are constantly working against different
and evolving threats involving various terrorist groups and various ways
they may seek to enter the country.”
She did say that the U.S.-Mexico border is
“heavily, heavily staffed at record amounts of manpower, materiel,
infrastructure and the like, and we are constantly making sure we're
doing all we can to make that border as safe as possible.”
The earlier report from the NDIC, a division of
the U.S. Justice Department, stated: “Of some concern to law enforcement
officials is the potential for using drug smuggling routes to move
terrorists or transport weapons of mass destruction into the United
States. However, there have been no incidents of this type documented,
and according to federal law enforcement officials, the involvement of
Mexican [drug trafficking organizations] in this type of activity is
very unlikely.”
But Napolitano is not the first to make a
statement to the contrary. In an August 2007 interview with the El Paso
Times, then-Director of National Intelligence Mike McConnell was asked:
“Are terrorist coming across the Southwest border?”
He responded: “Not in great numbers.”["Not
in great numbers???" What in the hell is that supposed to mean --
"only" one or two dozen??? How many did it take to commit the atrocities
of 9/11?]
“So there are some cases?” the interviewer asked.
Said McConnell: “There are some.” He added:
“There were a significant number of Iraqis who came across last year.
Smuggled across illegally."
Comment:
My thought is to build "tent camps" capable of housing a company of
troops, at 30-mile intervals along the southern border, and staff them
with Army, Marines and National guard, rotating through them at two-week
to one-month intervals for "training." That would give each camp a
15-mile radius to patrol -- using sophisticated listening devices and
small UAVs they could literally "seal" the border. It would take about
60 such tent camps to cover the border, excluding the areas that are
already fenced, and around 6,000 men at a time to man them.
Top Opinion
-
Seonag 2012/08/06 13:50:16






















I dig your idea, though.
That pretty much sums up the way I feel about the people who are supposedly protecting our borders for us. Wasting good manpower. Risking American lives needlessly. Oh, don't get me started on this subject, you don't have time to read all I have to say.
But I will comment before signing off that I think your take on the "tent camps" and placing military troops on our borders is not only clever but actually would be far better effective than what is going on now, what with the refusal to uphold legitimate laws of the United States and the placement of border patrol agents into situations which literally put their lives in jeopardy because of lack of support from higher-ups.
Anyway, I can't speak to the details of your plan, the actual marching orders or SOP's, but the overall concept is A-number-one in my book. Serves many purposes in both the military training arena as well as the border protection chores. Has anybody in our corrupt Congress bothered to recommend such an action? I'm curious. Because it sure sounds plausible to me.
By the way, though, the only good thing to come out of all the bad things that are going on today are the names and acronyms being developed on these sites. As sad as it may sound, I had to sit for a few minutes and stop laughing after reading this question, serious as it may be, because of the name Incompitano. Honestly, that is a really, really funny one. Sorry, but a good laugh helps to keep us able to deal with the horrible stuff.
And, lastly, what has happened to Border Patrol agents, as well as other law enforcement officers, is a travesty. I understand there are some few nut jobs that have slipped through the cracks and gotten jobs in law enforcement who are not deserving of the uniforms, but they are by far the exception. If you are speaking of the recent case that I am thinking about, those agents (1) should never, ever have been prosecuted, period and (2) to send them to prison is an evil act, period. Shame on us for allowing all of this to come to pass. (I wasn't aware that the trial was had and imprisonment was imposed. How are they doing and what's their status, do you know?)
Truth Be told I tend to see Obozo as a sham as well. I think when he is gone and we get the real information, we will all be grateful this regime was only one term.. (hopefully).
doing all we can to make that border as safe as possible.” - Incompitano
You can bet that they are making the border as safe as possible for all the illegals that want to come across because this administration is NOT working for the interests of the American citizens.
New administration should put Sheriff Joe in charge of Homeland Security (INS).
From inside South America’s Tri-border area, Iran-linked militia targets U.S.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/1...
From inside South America’s Tri-border area, Iran-linked militia targets U.S.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/1...
From inside South America’s Tri-border area, Iran-linked militia targets U.S.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/1...
Why are you folks always worried about the southern borders? We get thousands of undocumented Chinese coming in at the Western Ports. Rich people from all over the world fly in and overstay their visa's.
Then of course there are the H1B's who are often left in to train here for jobs that will be exported.
Let's get a little real. This is a big problem and the Southern border is no more of a problem then the rest. You think the subs the Colombian drug runners are using or the speed boats are coming across the Mexican border. Not much water there and the Rio Grande isn't that deep. Course I guess it is the Southern border since Florida, Mississippi, and Alabama are Southern.
From inside South America’s Tri-border area, Iran-linked militia targets U.S.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/1...