In leaked video, Romney says many Obama supporters are ‘dependent,’ feel ‘entitled’ Is Romney correct?

I've about come to the conclusion that Mitt is rarely correct.

Romney was great he reminded me of Regan. A very professional and polished speaker. Obama..................

Then there's the Congressman who work for just one term and leave. They receive a lifetime, government protected pension in which they receive the same amount of money each year that they made yearly when they were a Congressman. If that isn't welfare, then nothing is.

lol---clueless

lol Read your information - if it's correct! Do you really believe that 47% of people want to take government hand outs? Is this poll designed for the one percent? Why are 75% of the pollers stating that Mittens is right?

This government has been invaded by corporatists and it started with Reagan and Obama is part of it all too. BUT ---- you are a complete idiot to think that Mittens can turn it around.

Obama is a big Government Federal power elitist and Romney is about states rights---why would you support Obama? Do you disapprove of the constitution?

Cut it out - Do I disapprove of the constitution? That's a silly Right Wingnut question.
Obama might be big government (though he's not), but Mittens is a corporatist, who has no respect for the US worker.

Why do you hate your government so much?

I hate those who circumvent the wisdom of our Founding Fathers. I believe in people not Government

Right. You believe in corporations before people if you are voting for Mittens.

I totally disagree---I will say I agree with private business over Goverment

Well - that would be te same thing according to the Ryan Administration.

I am not familar with Ryan's comment but Ryan, nor anyone else, speak for me

Then you need to do some research into your man, Ayn Rand.

I believe as the founding fathers did---less Federal Goverment is best Government

BUT - what does that even mean? What would you like to see government do less of? We are an United States of America. Personally I'd like to see all my taxes stay in Minnesota. Why should I help people in places as ignorant as Louisiana or any southern state. BUT - I realize that's not the country I live in and I have a sense of humanity.

There are many people that are going to be voting their wallet. It really does not make a difference as the Republican has never addressed the problem either.

No if,ands,or buts.Romney is right.

I certainly hope that Romney doesn't feel "entitled" to the idea of becoming president.

After last nights ass kicking of Obama you Obama sheep might need to find a new poster to hang on your wall soon

Strong Debate Performance Does Not Seem Likely to Change Political Calculus

Overall, the dial testing and follow-up discussions showed Mitt Romney performing well, improving his personal appeal and a number of important attributes. Obama also impressed the group, but not to the same degree as Romney. However, the research does not suggest that Romney fundamentally changed the political calculus in this election. For example, while Romney picked up some voters, he mostly consolidated undecided voters who leaned Republican—the former McCain voters who had not yet warmed up to the Republican nominee. He did not cut into Obama’s weak support among voters in this group.
-----
In the end, though, this debate did not emerge as the game-changer the Romney campaign needed. While his ballot support grew in pre- and post-debate testing, so did Obama’s. Moreover, all of Romney’s gains came from Republican-leaning undecided voters. He did not move a single voter away from Obama.

http://www.democracycorps.com...

...yeah, right.

I will bet you a family Lobster dinner flown in from Maine Romney takes the lead nationally. Deal?

Deal.

I want a side of Clam chowder as well

The FiveThirtyEight forecast had Mr. Obama gaining slightly on Wednesday, estimating that he had a 86.1 percent chance of winning the Electoral College on Nov. 6 — up from 84.7 percent in Tuesday’s forecast.

This came despite the fact that it appeared there actually had been a modest shift back toward Mitt Romney in the polls even before the debate. In our “now-cast” — an estimate of what would happen if an election were held immediately — Mr. Obama’s projected margin of victory in the national popular vote had fallen by about one percentage point between Sunday and Wednesday.

Our Nov. 6 forecast, however, had already anticipated some decline for Mr. Obama, and so has been less sensitive to the shift.

In addition, there is a particular Electoral College outlook that is becoming problematic for Mr. Romney. As of Wednesday, our Nov. 6 forecast had Mr. Obama winning the popular vote by 4.1 percentage points. However, his advantage was larger than that — at least 4.9 percentage points, in 22 states (and the District of Columbia) — totaling 275 electoral votes:

http://fivethirtyeight.blogs....



...yeah, right.

Do you aspire to become wealthy? If so should you then be resented and hated because you became successful. I didn't think so.

You didn't answer the question

My life's aspirations are not centered on the mere attainment of wealth.

...and I certainly wouldn't denigrate those who've lacked the opportunities that have fallen my way.

Now I didn't say you did.
My question was do you aspire to gain wealth and success through your career ?

I certainly wouldn't define "success" as the mere attainment of wealth.

LOL---Did I say I did. No
You still didn't answer the question----why?

...actually I already have (several times).

"My life's aspirations are not centered on the mere attainment of wealth."

http://www.sodahead.com/unite...

Still no answer.
Let me get this straight, you do not want to ever get a raise or become wealthy. Did you ever turn down a raise?

Your question: "Do you aspire to become wealthy?"

My answer: "My life's aspirations are not centered on the mere attainment of wealth."

...it's just that simple.

So your answer is NO, you never want to be wealthy? You will turn down a raise if offered? You never want to win the lottery?
I say you are full of crap

Your question: "Do you aspire to become wealthy?"

My answer: "My life's aspirations are not centered on the mere attainment of wealth."

...it's just that simple.

YES

Since Obama removed the requirement to work in his "stimulus" to receive food stamps, the number of Americans dependent on them has doubled.

you might want to check your claims....he didn't remove the work requirement. here you go...."Romney’s ad says, "Under Obama’s plan (for welfare), you wouldn’t have to work and wouldn’t have to train for a job. They just send you your welfare check."

That's a drastic distortion of the planned changes to Temporary Assistance to Needy Families. By granting waivers to states, the Obama administration is seeking to make welfare-to-work efforts more successful, not end them. What’s more, the waivers would apply to individually evaluated pilot programs -- HHS is not proposing a blanket, national change to welfare law.

The ad tries to connect the dots to reach this zinger: "They just send you your welfare check." The HHS memo in no way advocates that practice. In fact, it says the new policy is "designed to improve employment outcomes for needy families."

The ad’s claim is not accurate, and it inflames old resentments about able-bodied adults sitting around collecting public assistance. Pants on Fire!" PolitiFact.com

You are talking about Obama's latest work waiver for welfare.

I'm talking about when he waived work requirements for foodstamps through the stimulus, and the numbers of dependants swelled.


"A new government study found that the number of able-bodied adults on food stamps nearly doubled after Washington used the stimulus law to lift a key work requirement."