Liberals didn't slam Sarah Palin for not being a stay-at-home mom. Liberals slammed Sarah Palin for being a corrupt, incompetent, fundamentalist wingnut that didn't understand the most basic facts regarding:
US History, Politics, Geography, Reading Comprehension, Social Policy, Foreign Policy, and the Constitution. And normally we liberals wouldn't make a fuss over a loudmouth ignoramus not taking the time to understand the basics of these things, but she happened to be picked for the Vice Presidency of the United States on the GOP ticket, so we thought it was sort of important. Sorry for raising the bar on you guys like that...
In 2008, liberals slammed Sarah Palin for NOT being a stay-at-home mom. In 2012, Ann Romney is criticized by a liberal for BEING a stay-at-home mom. Do liberals wage war on conservative women, no matter what choices those women make?
JenSemPa
2012/04/13 08:36:03
|
|
|||||
|
91 votes
|
|
62% | |||
|
10 votes
|
|
7% | |||
|
46 votes
|
|
31% | |||
Top Opinion
-
scbluesman13 2012/04/13 19:29:42
They proclaim to believe that people should be allowed to live the lifestyles that suit them. If a woman stays at home it is her and her partner's choice, no one elses.
Part of what the feminism movement of way back when did was to give women choices. They should not be lambasted if they choose what you dislike.
These liberals weren't really concerned about the welfare of the Palin family, of course. In fact, I'm sure they probably really didn't give a ---- about the Palin family.
That just became their convenient excuse to try to get a strong female conservative candidate out of their hair.
Liberals who played the "she should drop out and take care of her family" card against Palin were not doing so out of concern for her or her family. Come on, let's get real.
Besides, if conservatives were to say the very same thing about a female Democrat candidate, they'd be branded sexists -- wanting to return to the days when women stayed home barefoot and pregnant instead of pursuing careers.
Yet somehow, when liberals said that about Palin, they were NOT branded sexists or chauvinists. Gee, I wonder why that is.
Let's say it all together:
DOUBLE
STANDARDS
!!!
you might need to click this one twice to blow it up
can you give me the link to the article
The point of my mentioning this is simply that neither side can claim innocence when it comes to this subject. And of course none of this changes the fact that the poll we're discussing this in is predicated on a blatant lie told by it's author, Jen.
And here is the difference - Ms Romney is a pleasant nice sweet kind lady who loves her country. Mooch is a nasty hateful racist bitch who was never even proud of her country until the sheeple were stupid enough to fall for her husbands smile and empty rhetoric in spite of his ties to terrorists, communists, and racists as well as the fact that he is a complete fraud with Marxist tendencies that she shares. Stating the facts and name calling are two different things. Although when someone is as bad as she is - they kind of deserve it.
You want to talk about blatant lies? Then why not talk about the fact that obama's attorney now finally admits that his birth certificate is a fake. As fake as he is. http://www.teapartytribune.co...