I'm curious, Just what is the accepted "liberal" definition of a sexually promiscuous woman?

by Brian ☮ R P ☮ 2012 ☮ Posted 2012/03/06 08:31:33

Related Topics: Rush Limbaugh, Rush, College, Birth Control, Condoms, Limbaugh, Pregnancy, Birth, Hearing, Dollar, Slut

5 votes
Read all 17 opinions
View Results and Demographics + View Demographics

	Sex ain't none of yer business, even when we libs bring it up.
	Cons ain't allowed to voice their opinions on nuthin havin to do with libs.
	Sluts are fun.
	Undecided (Please leave a comment)
	All of the above
	None of the above (Please leave a comment)

Loading Demographics... Click an icon to see demographic results Display unknown and private
	Sex ain't none of yer business, even when we libs bring it up.	1 vote	20%
	Cons ain't allowed to voice their opinions on nuthin havin to do with libs.	0 votes	0%
	Sluts are fun.	0 votes	0%
	Undecided	1 vote	20%
	All of the above	1 vote	20%
	None of the above	2 votes	40%

From what I've gathered, Rush Limbaugh has come under attack yet again, for calling it like he sees it.

Apparently, ol Rushbo has "insulted" some young lady or another, by referring to her as a "slut", after she quite freely admitted to having paid $3,000 for birth control over the past three years. Quite frankly, after hearing all of the falderal, I must admit I have pretty much the same thought, and here's why: BIRTH CONTROL IS RELATIVELY CHEAP!! Yep, that's right folks, preventing unwanted pregnancies is pretty inexpensive. That $3,000 bucks could not only buy a full 3 years worth of birth control pills at $30.00 a month (on average), but a big honkin boatload of condoms to boot.

Now don't get me wrong here, I like sluts. Sluts are more fun to be with and around than the average woman. But holy crap, three freakin thousand dollars for 3 years of fun time?? That's a whoooole lotta fun! Kinda wish I had that much fun in college. I guess the old adage that "women can get it whenever they want it", ain't such a misnomer...at least not for this lass.

At least she didn't say she was charging for that fun, or ol Rush would've had to call her something else.

Add a comment above

J.MaisOui 2012/10/22 02:43:31 (edited)

None of the above

+1
Tramp...? :0) Oh!! No, WAIT!!! They call that "dating" now. ...disgusting, ..but true.

reply
Brian ☮... to J.MaisOui 2012/10/22 02:52:30

That would probably draw the ire of certain females, just as much as the term "slut" would. I believe this is one of those "no win" situations.

reply
J.MaisOui to Brian ☮... 2012/10/22 03:08:17

+1
...only the sluts.

reply
Hippygirl 2012/08/20 22:47:40

Sex ain't none of yer business, even when we libs bring it up.

“And especially in the last week, I have heard more and more of their stories. On a daily basis, I hear yet from another woman from Georgetown or from another school or who works for a religiously-affiliated employer, and they tell me that they have suffered financially and emotionally and medically because of this lack of coverage. “And so, I’m here today to share their voices, and I want to thank you for allowing them –not me –to be heard. “Without insurance coverage, contraception, as you know, can cost a woman over $3,000 during law school.......http://www.buzzf...
she freely admitted NO SUCH Thing. She cleary said CAN cost SOME WOMAN. twisting some/ones words so that he could call her a slut on air got him better ratings. Just so you and Rush know a woman is not a slut for liking a lot of sex. Women can have a lot sex with many or just one person. THEY WOULD STILL NEED THE SAME AMOUNT OF BIRTHCONTROL!!!!!!!!!!!!! I have been with my boyfriend 8 years we have sex 5-7 times a week. Do you think that makes me a slut? Weather you do or don't really doesn't matter because even though I told you its not your business. And before you go off about it is if I expect you to pay for my birth control. I don't my tubes are tied.

reply
J.MaisOui to Hippygirl 2012/10/22 02:50:50

+1
...she should just get spayed.

reply
Jo 2012/03/06 09:49:04

None of the above

+1
Only an idiot doesnt realize that birth control is used for many things other than sex, and he knows nothing of her personal relationship situation, which would explain how often she's having sex; "Calling it as he sees it"----you make it sound thats an admirable thing. If he saw a woman walking down the street that weighed 300 lbs, are you saying it would be acceptable for him to walk up to her and call her a fat ass because, after all, he's just "calling it like he sees it"? No, of course not. His statement was highly inappropriate in a public situation, and totally inexcusable; "calling it as he sees it" is completely irrelevant.

reply
Brian ☮... to Jo 2012/03/06 11:44:02

+1
Sure, sure, condoms could be used to make balloon animals, and I know they've been used to waterproof detonation devices on underwater explosives. I also suppose you could illegally distribute all those extra prescription birth control pills that such a huge sum of cash could buy, to female friends with acne or to regulate their periods (why you would be paying for THEIR birth control and calling it your own is beyond me). Maybe even spermicidal foams and ointments have a use other than as a spermicide, or that IUD's could be used as ornaments or something...I dunno. But I do know one thing, when those things ARE used for birth control, sex is generally involved, and that amount of cash, for the amount of birth control it would purchase, indicates a lot of gettin down.

So tell me, just what is the "socially acceptable" term for someone who appears to be getting down soooo much?? I would certainly hate to be caught in such a faux pas as Rush when describing such a person.

reply
Jo to Brian ☮... 2012/03/06 19:25:47

its flat out not possible to use $3000 worth birth control in one month for sexual purposes--theres not enough hours in the day, ESPECIALLY for a Georgetown law student---I would think that would be common sense; I'd also think that it would be common sense that the stance she's taking is not just for herself, but then again, conservatives always do that--they assume if you take issue with something its because of some personal association with it, and thats not always the case (not everybody is strictly out for themseslves). But, I also know that you probably dont realize that, so I'll cut you some slack.

reply
Brian ☮... to Jo 2012/03/07 01:10:05

+1
Before you deign to ever so generously cut anyone any slack, perhaps you should actually read and understand all the postings on this subject. I know, it's hard for libs to do anything but offer inane gut reactions of offense and indignation to certain words that are bandied about, especially if they're uttered by an eeevil conservative. Being upset with anything that conservatives do It is their primary stock in trade after all. But from everything I've read, it wasn't $3,000 a month, but $3,000 for 3 YEARS. Please pay attention before getting your knickers all in a twist.

I'm ever so sorry that conservatives take what people say so literally and at face value. It's a terrible consequence of understanding that words have actual meanings, and actually understanding those meanings. Silly conservatives, how dare they apply logic and reason, or even common sense, to the things that liberals say. They should know better by now.

I take it you simply don't want to answer the actual question I asked in the header of the post, and again in my last reply, you know, the one about exactly what to call someone who indicates they are promiscuous. Please, enlighten me with an acceptable alternative.

reply
Jo to Brian ☮... 2012/03/07 01:16:09

+1
there is no appropriate term for those who are promiscuous, other than to refer to them as promiscuous; the thing is, especially in this situation, 1) you dont truly have any idea about her sex life, and 2) it has nothing to do with women needing medical care, therefore, any term at all would be inapropriate. Womens health issues in the reproductive arena crop up just as much in virgins---theres uterine cancer, cervical cancer, fibroid cysts, endometrosis, and a whole slew of other things that brith control pills are prescribed for that have nothing to do with sex---this girl is referring to womens health and the coverage of said health; that has no relevance to her personal sex life.

reply
Brian ☮... to Jo 2012/03/07 03:13:33

+1
Oh good grief! You just don't seem to get it. Mincing words, for the sake of delicate sensibilities, is simply a grand exercise in the wasting of time. Sorry if you don't like that, but it is what it is, and conservatives are, if nothing else, a plain spoken bunch, not interested in such inane things as feelings. As far as birth control being used for a myriad or other conditions...perhaps so, but unless somehow otherwise alluded to, birth control is specifically for the control of pregnancy, which usually results in a birth, and is almost always a byproduct of sexual relations. Oops, there goes that whole words have meanings thing I spoke of on my last reply, how inconvenient. If my lady were to tell me she's out of birth control, I would immediately offer to run down to the store and pick up her refill prescription, or ask if she wants ribbed, lubricated, both, or the kind with a spermicide. I certainly wouldn't be inclined to ask, or even assume, if she was having gynecological problems. Sane people just don't think that way.

reply
Jo to Brian ☮... 2012/03/07 06:51:26

+1
good grief is right---being male, I dont know why you'd think you have a better understanding of the myriad of things birth control pills are used for, but then again, you're a conservative, so I need to make allowances for that. I have no idea what words you think I'm "mincing" for "the sake of delicate sensibilities", but I can assure you, that was not my intent. Some women are prescribed birth control pills strictly for the prevention of pregnancy---obviously thats the case with your significant other, therefore, if she ran out, there would be no reason to think that she needed them for some other reason. But many women are prescribed them specifically for other reasons. Believe it, dont believe it, whatever you want to do, it makes no difference to me, it is what it is. Oh, and I like how you remind me that conservatives arent interested in such "inane" things as feelings.....thats one of the main reasons I cant stand them, and wouldnt vote for one if there was a gun held to my head:))

reply
Brian ☮... to Jo 2012/03/07 13:19:03

Feelings simply have no place in the application of logic and reason, which is why I can't stand, or could ever vote for a liberal. Not that most conservatives are much better, just more easily understood by libertarians such as myself. The "mincing" of words I was referring to were not yours, but reference the fact that most conservatives refuse to do so. Hence my observation that they are a plain spoken bunch, and subsequently a literal thinking bunch, who automatically consider the meanings of words spoken, by their generally accepted meanings. The generally accepted meaning of birth control is...preventing pregnancies as a result of sexual intercourse. Something you steadfastly refuse to acknowledge, what with all of your colorful excuses and explanations of the other uses of "birth control", that were never even minutely alluded to by the woman in question. Nor have you bothered to address the excessive and extreme cost of said "birth control". A single prescription for the pills is pretty cheap (especially the generics), and no sane doctor would prescribe the multiple doses of hormones this amount of money would buy to one female patient, as that would be extremely dangerous. Regardless of the fact that I am a man, I do know a bit about human female physiology, including...

Feelings simply have no place in the application of logic and reason, which is why I can't stand, or could ever vote for a liberal. Not that most conservatives are much better, just more easily understood by libertarians such as myself. The "mincing" of words I was referring to were not yours, but reference the fact that most conservatives refuse to do so. Hence my observation that they are a plain spoken bunch, and subsequently a literal thinking bunch, who automatically consider the meanings of words spoken, by their generally accepted meanings. The generally accepted meaning of birth control is...preventing pregnancies as a result of sexual intercourse. Something you steadfastly refuse to acknowledge, what with all of your colorful excuses and explanations of the other uses of "birth control", that were never even minutely alluded to by the woman in question. Nor have you bothered to address the excessive and extreme cost of said "birth control". A single prescription for the pills is pretty cheap (especially the generics), and no sane doctor would prescribe the multiple doses of hormones this amount of money would buy to one female patient, as that would be extremely dangerous. Regardless of the fact that I am a man, I do know a bit about human female physiology, including that of the endocrine system, and quite a bit about pharmacology.

I realize that we will never come to any kind of an accord on this issue. You will continue to consider plain spoken people as bullies with no heart or soul, and I will continue to consider people who bring up things not in evidence as a frivolous lot who expect too much, but you have a nice day anyways.
(more)

reply
Jo to Brian ☮... 2012/03/07 15:23:36

I dont at all refuse to acknowledge that birth control is primarily used for purposes of preventing pregnancy; that is the most common use, I'm simply pointing out that 1) there are other issues its used for, regardless of her mention of them or lack thereof, and 2) she's fighting for more than simple birth control pills.

Oh, and btw, you claim to know about pharmacology, yet did NOT know that if your girlfriend has a prescription for birth control pills, generally the reason for that prescription was decided at the time it was given to her?

You're right, we wont come to any kind of accord:)

reply
Brian ☮... to Jo 2012/03/07 17:47:20

You ASSUME I don't know what girlfriends prescriptions are for, only because I didn't go into specifics, just as the woman in question didn't go into ANY specifics about other uses of birth control. Highly presumptuous of you. If you must know, hers (my lady friend's) are not only for actual birth control (their primary use), but to help regulate her hormonal fluctuations through her onset of menopause. When my wife was alive, she was prescribed the equivalent of birth control pills to replace hormones after a radical hysterectomy, and it would in all probability NOT indicate an imminent night of passion, if I were informed her prescription was out.

BTW, I only mentioned my lady friend as an offhand example, not as the be all end all of uses for birth control, or why I would happily think we were gonna get down later that evening, if she happened to inform me that she was out of birth control. There are usually other marked indicators of that wondrous event, but being prepared IS generally a good indicator of what's on HER mind, maybe not so much any other woman.

Perhaps that is the problem, you women expect us men to think like you do, when in fact we have no idea of how to think like anything but men.

reply
J.MaisOui to Brian ☮... 2012/10/22 02:59:16

... Skank? Wonder where she shops...hmmm....or the brand..?...maybe they're designer...? I'm glad that she was honest. It may have prevented something major, like an epidemic. Maybe she's one of those orgy people.

reply
J.MaisOui to Jo 2012/10/22 02:54:22 (edited)

I agree. He should just know it, and keep it to himself.Most people would agree with him, except the sleazy ones.

reply