It's another red herring, like forcing secular businesses to provide birth control and abortion services. Throw it out there, then listen to the screaming and republican bashing when they try to put a stop to it. Obammy politics as usual.
The maddening details of Obama’s DREAM Decree are becoming clearer. As this CIS report notes, 1) The decree doesn’t just apply to illegal immigrants who were “brought to this country by their parents.” It also would give work permits to those who snuck across the border by themselves as teenagers. “Through no fault of their own” is a talking point for DREAM proselytizers, not an actual legal requirement. 2) The same goes for the phrase “and know only this country as home.” That’s a highly imaginative riff on the decree’s actual requirement, which is for 5 years “continuous residence.” It turns out “continuous residence” doesn’t mean what you think it means. “Immigration attorneys have been successful in getting immigration courts to whittle this down to a point where it is almost meaningless,” says CIS’s Jon Feere. As an illegal immigrant you can go back abroad for multiple 6-month stints during those five years–but, if precedent holds, in Janet Napolitano’s eyes you will still “know only this country as home.” …
Update: 3) Another mini-amnesty requirement–“do not present a risk … to public safety” –might not mean what it seems to mean either. According to Heather Mac Donald, if Obama’s decree follows the DREAM language, you could qualify if you have a criminal record with se...
The maddening details of Obama’s DREAM Decree are becoming clearer. As this CIS report notes, 1) The decree doesn’t just apply to illegal immigrants who were “brought to this country by their parents.” It also would give work permits to those who snuck across the border by themselves as teenagers. “Through no fault of their own” is a talking point for DREAM proselytizers, not an actual legal requirement. 2) The same goes for the phrase “and know only this country as home.” That’s a highly imaginative riff on the decree’s actual requirement, which is for 5 years “continuous residence.” It turns out “continuous residence” doesn’t mean what you think it means. “Immigration attorneys have been successful in getting immigration courts to whittle this down to a point where it is almost meaningless,” says CIS’s Jon Feere. As an illegal immigrant you can go back abroad for multiple 6-month stints during those five years–but, if precedent holds, in Janet Napolitano’s eyes you will still “know only this country as home.” …
Update: 3) Another mini-amnesty requirement–“do not present a risk … to public safety” –might not mean what it seems to mean either. According to Heather Mac Donald, if Obama’s decree follows the DREAM language, you could qualify if you have a criminal record with several misdemeanors, as long as the total jail time was less than 90 days. Given the tendency of prosecutors to plea-bargain down disturbing crimes (like theft), that would hardly limit the amnesty to those who, in Obama’s words, have “done everything right [their] entire life.” …
What does Obama care if your not working,hes working,and no ones going to take his pension away.He doesn't give a flying F _ _ k about you,or your family,none of them do.
It is so patriotic to allow people to vote, but if you fail to put and in to the slavery drug traffic, and the smuggling of human bodies then I'm sorry, but you will lose my support and my vote.
Our Government does worry about us. The President's historic move, in addition to simply being the only thing an ethical and moral nation could do if they are going to be true to the values that this country is based on, strengthens us as a nation, AND makes sense from a financial viewpoint. The only people who have a problem with this are those who are so extreme in their views that they think that helping "brown" children who themselves have not done a single thing wrong is somehow a violation of their White Supremacist goals for America.
If illegals are already getting "free" emergency care, then giving them temporary legal status won't change anything, will it?
Incidentally, I AGREE that there is a real problem with the fact that illegals and anyone who doesn't have health coverage can walk into an ER and get the same medical care that would cost us thousands of dollars. That's one of the many benefits of the Health Care Reform Law - less uninsured people walking into ERs means less taxpayer outlay for their medical care. But since the Law doesn't cover illegal aliens, that aspect of it doesn't change. Of course, if these people are granted temporary status, then they will be paying for their own health care assuming the Supreme Court can for once put politics aside and uphold the law, and that's yet another taxpayer benefit from the President's directive.
But what do we do when there's an illegal alien lying in the street bleeding and in need of immediate medical care to live? Do we just leave him there to die? We could treat him and then deport him, but the cost of the medical care is still there. I don't have an answer to that one.
It's another red herring, like forcing secular businesses to provide birth control and abortion services. Throw it out there, then listen to the screaming and republican bashing when they try to put a stop to it. Obammy politics as usual.
Update: 3) Another mini-amnesty requirement–“do not present a risk … to public safety” –might not mean what it seems to mean either. According to Heather Mac Donald, if Obama’s decree follows the DREAM language, you could qualify if you have a criminal record with se...
Update: 3) Another mini-amnesty requirement–“do not present a risk … to public safety” –might not mean what it seems to mean either. According to Heather Mac Donald, if Obama’s decree follows the DREAM language, you could qualify if you have a criminal record with several misdemeanors, as long as the total jail time was less than 90 days. Given the tendency of prosecutors to plea-bargain down disturbing crimes (like theft), that would hardly limit the amnesty to those who, in Obama’s words, have “done everything right [their] entire life.” …
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/0...
That is but one example. We ALL know that ILLEGALS are getting FREE healthcare.
Incidentally, I AGREE that there is a real problem with the fact that illegals and anyone who doesn't have health coverage can walk into an ER and get the same medical care that would cost us thousands of dollars. That's one of the many benefits of the Health Care Reform Law - less uninsured people walking into ERs means less taxpayer outlay for their medical care. But since the Law doesn't cover illegal aliens, that aspect of it doesn't change. Of course, if these people are granted temporary status, then they will be paying for their own health care assuming the Supreme Court can for once put politics aside and uphold the law, and that's yet another taxpayer benefit from the President's directive.
But what do we do when there's an illegal alien lying in the street bleeding and in need of immediate medical care to live? Do we just leave him there to die? We could treat him and then deport him, but the cost of the medical care is still there. I don't have an answer to that one.