ILLEGAL ALIENS BUSTED VOTING IN FLORIDA
Why are Democrats so uniformly opposed to proof of citizenship in
order to vote? They and their interest group surrogates insist there is
no problem with voter security. But why should we believe this when we
know illegal immigrants routinely lie to obtain employment? (Federal law
requires employees to sign a document called an I-9 Form upon becoming
employed swearing under penalty of perjury that he or she is authorized
for employment, i.e., is a citizen or lawfully admitted alien and to
provide two forms of ID to prove it.) I have seen thousands of bogus I-9
Forms signed by illegal immigrants and copies of their false social
security cards in my RICO cases against employers who hire them. These
false attestations are rarely prosecuted by federal authorities. And why
would we think illegal immigrants, whose very presence in this country
is a crime, would be above a little more crime in order to obtain
employment?
Once that is understood, why would we think illegal immigrants would
not also lie to obtain medical care in public hospitals, food stamps,
unemployment benefits, and register to vote? Only two states actually
require proof of citizenship in order to register (Arizona and Kansas).
The others merely require the applicant sign a sworn statement
attesting to the fact that he or she is a citizen. But this is what is
asked, and routinely perjured, on the I-9 Form. Thus, it follows that
false claims of citizenship in order to register to vote should be
widespread. There are some media reports of non-citizens voting, but
generally, the media have not investigated the problem in any depth
compared to their obsession with the insurmountable problem Republicans
will have with Hispanic "voters."
The perceived trouble Republicans face, we are constantly told, stems
from the party's opposition to illegal immigration. And perhaps there
is a kernel of truth to this theory. It stands to reason that illegal
immigrants who are illegally registered to vote would have a very real
stake in seeing to it that Republicans do not come to power with their
far right ideas about requiring proof of citizenship to vote (which has
been required since the founding of the Republic) and to be employed in
this country. After all, if these laws were seriously enforced, it might
be intolerable for illegal immigrants to live in the U.S. They would,
presumably, lose employment, subsidized medical care, and the right to
vote for candidates for will perpetuate such a way of life.
Democratic party spokesmen justify their opposition to laws requiring
proof of citizenship in order to register to vote by the absurd claim
that poor people do not have birth certificates or passports. But we
require everyone, including the poor, to produce such documents when
becoming employed for their I-9 Forms. And if that is tolerable, then it
must also be tolerable for the same documents to be produced to
register to vote and some sort of photo ID in order to vote.
There is a huge problem with voter fraud. And, in my opinion, it is
proven by the vehemence of the Democrats, the beneficiaries of the
fraud, toward enforcement of our laws.
Read More: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/howard-foster/democr...
Top Opinion
-
Yankee Traveler 2012/05/20 21:38:22ONLY Americans have the right to vote in our elections.+11if it wasn't for undocumented democrats voting democrats wouldn't have anyone voting at all!!!






















My friends in the IRS are so disgusted by the flagged returns being brought to the supervisors with 10 dependants yet they are told to process them anyway.
Even my democrat friends will not support him any longer, especially in FL where there are no jobs to be found and the state is littered with decaying forclosures.
Everyone needs to contact their reps and demand the registration rolls be purged immediately! Call an unemployed friend and go visit your reps in person.
SICK BIRD....LOL
That means most of her husband's voter base can't even get to see her.
Of course you'd have to find a few Republicans with enough gonads to sponsor a bill like that.
Documenting the right to vote is far too lax both intentionally and unintentionally. Just the last time I voted as they looked down the voter-list to verify my name I also saw my son's name (living and registered in another state for three years); my brother's name (deceased for over five years); my dad's name (deceased for about ten years.) I wasn't asked for my voters'-registration card or ID. I could have later voted again as any of them.
Several months ago I was at the Secretary of State's office renewing my drivers' license. In front of me was a Middle-Eastern couple. A...
Of course you'd have to find a few Republicans with enough gonads to sponsor a bill like that.
Documenting the right to vote is far too lax both intentionally and unintentionally. Just the last time I voted as they looked down the voter-list to verify my name I also saw my son's name (living and registered in another state for three years); my brother's name (deceased for over five years); my dad's name (deceased for about ten years.) I wasn't asked for my voters'-registration card or ID. I could have later voted again as any of them.
Several months ago I was at the Secretary of State's office renewing my drivers' license. In front of me was a Middle-Eastern couple. After the man got his license-plates, the woman at the counter asked if he was a registered voter. He said "No" and she asked if he would like to register. He said "Yes" and she gave him and he filled out the card and gave it back to her. She asked him to raise his right hand and if he swore he was a US citizen, etc and he said "yes." Then she asked his wife if she was a registered voter. The wife looked at the husband and he said something to her in... some other language... and then she said "No" to the clerk, who then asked if she would like to be registerd. The man then said something else in that language to his wife and then she said "Yes" to the clerk who gave her a card. The husband filled it out for her and handed it to his wife who then handed it back to the clerk.
She asked the woman to raise her right hand (the husband translated that to the wife) which she did. Then the clerk asked her if she swore she was a US citizen, etc, etc. The husband again said something to the wife in a foreign language and she said "Yes" to the clerk.
When I got to the counter I mentioned it to the clerk. She said I'm supposed to ask everyone if they're registered and if they want to register. I asked about identification and proof of citizenship. She said she was instructed not to ask anyone for that.
And there you go. Two more voters, neither of which were asked to show proof of citizenship or identity. (And the last I heard one of the minimum requirements for becoming an American citizen, among other things, was to be fluent and conversant in the English language.)
Much chance of voter fraud occurring? Why of course not! (rolls eyes)
And after I'd renewed my license, she asked me if I was a registered voter! LOL
Even a liberal-Democrat would have a hard time justifying voting against a law like that. It's not "an undue hardship" on anyone, it doesn't discriminate or violate due process, equal protection under the 14th amendment, the prohibition of unreasonable search and seizure under the 4th amendment, or "racial profiling" because the mandatory sentencing would only be applicable to those who have already been convicted of voter-fraud. And, if as the Democrats always say, voter-fraud is so rare, then the law would rarely be used anyway. How could they defend voting against it?
Just a conviction or two might scare enough people into not registering unlawfully, registrars into not "just following orders" (like guards in a concentration camp) to register people illegally; and precinct workers into not helping them get away with it. (Or "finding" a couple of boxes of write-in ballots "forgotten" in the trunk of their car with votes for Al Frankin or Algore on them.)
But, like I said above, you'd have to find a few Republicans with enough gonads to sponsor a bill like that. Which might be difficult. Many of them will "talk the talk" but very few will actually "walk the walk."
Complaining to Conyers would be like a cat complaining to a pit-bull that he doesn't like being chased by the cocker spaniel next door! LOL
But thanks anyway.
Many Americans have profited and built there own careers and businesses from our
work. I raised my hand and pledged my allegiance to this country and vowed to uphold and defend our constitution. These Illegals have done neither. They have broken many laws and are sending $4billion of our tax money illegally back to their countries every year. They are bankrupting our hospitals and schools. I have no problem improving our
immigration laws but NO, they do not have the right to vote. They only have the right
to a fair trial and deportation. Buzzy
everyday if you have to......make them listen to YOU!!!