If you were forced to listen for an hour to Rush Limbaugh or Rachel Maddow, who would you choose?
rand
2012/07/19 02:57:56
|
|
|||||
|
20 votes
|
|
45% | |||
|
15 votes
|
|
34% | |||
|
9 votes
|
|
20% | |||
Top Opinion
-
tommyg - POTL- PWCM-JLA 2012/07/19 03:13:43Rush



















As for Rush’s harangue about Darwin somehow being responsible (along with Freud) for all the evils in the world since his time, this is standard creationist boilerplate and is known as an argumentum ad consequentiam or an “appeal to consequences“. The claim being that if an idea leads to bad consequences then it must be false. This is obvious nonsense.