If Obama leads the Country toward socialism, would you support States separating from the Union?
Janet C K
2012/06/21 03:58:22
|
|
|||||
|
61 votes
|
|
70% | |||
|
3 votes
|
|
3% | |||
|
23 votes
|
|
26% | |||
Top Opinion
-
Balladeer-PWCM-POTL 2012/06/21 04:22:41Yes, States were suppose to maintain their sovereignty, why not?
If my state was seriously thinking about succession, I would support it and even propose that my state also absorb 1/50th of the national debt when succeeding so we can do so responsibly.
It is also noteworthy that the house is setup by representation per population -- not per state, which means the majority of the population has voted republican in the house. This has major implications for the democrats.
1) Hitler rose to power using the economic turbulent times with promises of "CHANGE", "HOPE", and moving "Forward".
2) Hitler took office and divided the nation down the center via religion and ethnicity.
3) Hitler established worker internment camps that later became death camps (FEMA).
4) Hitler seized control over all of German resources (See Obama's Preparedness Exec Order)
5) Hitler set up programs to have families and friends report each other whom said bad things about the Nazi's (See NDAA)
I have several more, and I know each by itself means near-nothing, but when you add this up, the subtotal is not pretty.
Lets see,.... no more caps on the medical care you can receive, so if your child gets leukemia, half way through her treatment the insurance company can no longer say she gets no more coverage.
ON that child with leukemia, she can no longer be dropped from her coverage because she is sick.
As of fall of 2011, the child w/ leukemia who was previously denied getting coverage, could finally get an insurance policy long with every other child who was sick, and could not be charged more and could not be declined. That sick child finally had medical care.
In 2014, people who have been denied insurance for ANY reason, will not longer be denied, all can get it, no one turned down.
Prices are not allowed to increase as they have in the past... they have tried it in places and were not allowed.
That is just a few things about the health care reform act.
So you tell me.... why is it horrible to allow the child w/ leukemia to continue getting her care?
Why is it horrible to allow that sick child to get an insurance policy?
Why do you prefer that the child die instead?
Answer that...
Read the link I posted... gives a time line of what has been done and what will be done. Explanations of everything... easy to read. Much better than the one the White House put out.
As as far as auto insurance goes,.. we used toi\ have to pay additionally for "uninsured" motorist. not anymore. And "liability" means if you cause the accident... YOU are LIABLE. That is why it is called LIABILITY insurance.
Go back and pay attention to 2009, re read the info and see who it was who demanded the insurance clause. YOu will see then.
For me.. life is short and frankly, you do not want to learn truths, you just want to argue and hate. So to me, you are a waste of time.
anyways,. he did not expect a freak terrible injury like that, but it happened anyways and thankfully he does have insurance, very good insurance and while he still had to shovel out several thousand dollars, his insurance paid the majority of his bills. What if he had had no insurance like me? yikes!
And look at the countries that are not free? Like China You are going to try and compare a Marxist government now as you carelessly leave out the more comparable systems like Canada and Norway -- two of the epicenters of capitalist economic social healthcare systems that have proven this type of system fails miserably.
We all need health care at one time or anther, we just plain do. That is simply not true at all, and when I do need it, I will get it, but that is and should remain MY CHOICE. Ever try and do the math for insurance? IT IS STUPID MATH -- $400.00/mo for one person for $20,000 coverage per year. Simply saving that $400.00/mo would be BETTER insurance than HAVING insurance, and if medical insurance ever gets so much that you can't afford it, what then? CHARGE A BROKE PERSON A PENALTY INSURING HE LOOSES WHAT ELSE LITTLE HE HAS LEFT? What a retarded plan.
slipped and fell in the mud of all things here on New years, and broke his ankle in 4 places! And my homeowner's insurance would have easily covered this without all the hassle of medical insura...
You are going to try and compare a Marxist government now as you carelessly leave out the more comparable systems like Canada and Norway -- two of the epicenters of capitalist economic social healthcare systems that have proven this type of system fails miserably.
That is simply not true at all, and when I do need it, I will get it, but that is and should remain MY CHOICE. Ever try and do the math for insurance? IT IS STUPID MATH -- $400.00/mo for one person for $20,000 coverage per year. Simply saving that $400.00/mo would be BETTER insurance than HAVING insurance, and if medical insurance ever gets so much that you can't afford it, what then? CHARGE A BROKE PERSON A PENALTY INSURING HE LOOSES WHAT ELSE LITTLE HE HAS LEFT? What a retarded plan.
And my homeowner's insurance would have easily covered this without all the hassle of medical insurance.
And you're about to make my case for me... Answer: He would have gotten treatment anyways because it is FEDERAL LAW THAT HE CANNOT BE TURNED AWAY FOR EMERGENCY TREATMENT OR TREATMENT RELATED TO AN EMERGENCY, and been responsible for the bill in which he could have easily called and had them work with him and put them into payments EASIER TO PAY than insurance over the period of a year or two.
your lies about Canada are exactly that... lies. They spend much less per person on medical than we do, and they get much more. No one was charged 800% of anything. Blatant BS crap. YOu see you miss the entire point..... the insurance companies are the ones who are in this for profit and they are the ones who are pricing this out. We are the only country that has "for profit" medical. In Canada your tax dollars go straight into paying medical.. no middle man, no insurance company. Are you getting this?
http://www.healthcare.gov/law...
And you call them Hitler?
Bush made FEMA weak and Obama took it back to how it was under Clinton where it would be strong again.
Do you remember katrina and how screwed up the operations were because of mismanagement? Then Gen Honore came in and took over and straightened it out. Too late for many because Bush's pal Micheal Brown had already screwed up beyond belief.
This is in part why Obama had to fix it!
You think we do not need homeland security?
Just let the bad guys in? Bush did, he had no problem with it. But you may not want to tell the victims of 911 that you think homeland security is unnecessary. But give it a whirl,. let me know how that works out for you.
THIS DOCUMENT ALSO GIVES UNLIMITED AND UNABRIDGED POWER TO FEMA IN THESE CAMPS THAT IS EVEN ABOVE REPROACH FROM THE JUDICIAL AND LEGISLATIVE BRANCHES AND HAS NO OVERSIGHT.