If Hillary Clinton runs for president in 2016 Will you support her ?

It was SO messed up in 2008, when Obama nurtured the notion that Hillary meant to diminish the work of MLK Jr. during the 2008 primary with her criticism of Obama's ability to bring Congress together to get things done. Hell, she was right! Why doesn't he tell Harry Reid to stop blocking bills from being voted on? Will we support this "approach" if we lose the Senate- and cry like children because we can do it but they can't? Are we that short sighted? I don't understand this? If we are not the obstructionists, why do we not allow a vote and stand by whatever proper vote members take? All I hear is talk about the Republicans- when are we going to take responsibilty for not passing a budget? Bill RAN on balancing the national debt! Instead of prioritizing now we're going to add FREE contraception on the backs of employers? Why not a nominal copay? I just think Hillary was right. This game playing just pits both parties against each other. If (like Hillary said) Lyndon Johnson could get racist leaning men back in the days of civil protests, to vote for civil rights- why can't Obama personally go and visit and call members of Congress--DAILY-- if he needs to, to put forth the effort to demonstrate that he CARES about cooperation? I just think it was wrong- considering race relations in this country, for him to pull that crap of sympathizing and reverbalizing misperceived ill intent, rubbing salt in the wounds of the past, creating suspicion, among black voters, that Hillary was disrespecting MLK Jr. When she was a huge supporter of him.
Obama, IF who he claimed he was, could have simply said, "I intend to be a president who inspires like MLk. jr., AND puts forth the effort of Lyndon Johnson- as both men were important in getting civil rights passed!". But, he didn't. He used division to get the black support away from Hillary in a way where we didn't question even if maybe she had a valid point? We were so brainwashed that all we could do is worry about how others misperceived a very valid point! (it was right before the South Carolina primary, and she was leading). But I guess that was a taste of how he handles things, and I guess everyone except me is cool with that. Hillary deserves a public apology from him. Her criticism was PROPHETIC.

So you'll agree that since Obama WILL NOT LEAD, and ask Senate Dems to do a budget, or do anything unless they get their way, since the House is likely to remain Republican, and Obama WON'T lead like Lyndon Johnson, there's no point to keeping Obama unless you want nothing to get done like the first two years when he had a supermajority- right? Face it, 57 Billion, raised by tax increases- THAT DEMS REFUSED TO VOTE FOR IN OBAMA'S BUDGET (not even one!), still would never fix the problem of overspending! Unemployment comp changed from 16 weeks to 99 weeks, has been a horrible mistake. Programs to help people keep their home, encouraging them to default to qualify for help- a horrible mistake since it only helped 2%, and gave those who could've paid a bad credit history & a foreclosure- not to mention created a flood of houses on the market dropping the value of housing.... A President that runs the government on theory, instead of experience, has made the mess. Otherwise IF it were as bad as he claims it was--- he would have had the common sense not to throw healthcare into the mix to complicate matters. Any experienced perso also would have been in touch with reality to see no one- not even Obama followers- could/would run out and create a green energy market- buying Volts, Solyndra products, or Ener1 products. The technology is too expensive, and not practical for living in the city with nowhere to plug in. To many ambitions, no ability to prioritize based on market demand and consumer credit/funds.