If Hillary Clinton runs for president in 2016 Will you support her ?

by Tudie BN Posted 2012/05/07 14:28:26

Related Topics: Hillary Clinton, Clinton, 2016, Questions, President

494 votes
Read all 1,051 opinions
Lightning Report View Results and Demographics + View Demographics

		Yes
		no
		Other
		Undecided (Please leave a comment)
		None of the above (Please leave a comment)

Loading Demographics... Click an icon to see demographic results Display unknown and private
	Yes	132 votes	27%
	no	309 votes	63%
	Other	14 votes	3%
	Undecided	27 votes	5%
	None of the above	12 votes	2%

Welcome Friends to Tudies Questions ! Thanks for your reply ! : )

+63

Add a comment above

MkB 2012/05/08 06:12:18

no

+36
Been there, tried to do that in 2008.

Amusingly ironic that as a young Republican Clinton discovered electoral fraud against Richard Nixon in South Side Chicago. Ground zero area for voter fraud and home of Barack Obama.
>> See Replies

More polls by Tudie BN

ronbo 2012/05/08 16:21:20

no

+4
She,s power hungry and cunning like her old man (Bill Clinton) was. I don,t want any more Clintons or Bushes in power or any of the Draconian one world crap they push.

reply
Hillary... to ronbo 2012/05/08 19:58:19

HILLARY CLINTON 2016. She will run and she will win.

reply
Rusty Shackleford 2012/05/08 16:19:15

no

+6
Not just no, but HELL NO !

reply
mwg0735 2012/05/08 16:17:19
Common ... to mwg0735 2012/05/08 16:39:41

+4
I thought she was 190 now.

reply
marylou5 to Common ... 2012/05/08 16:51:51

+2
:-)

reply
mwg0735 to Common ... 2012/05/08 18:27:48
Hillary... to Common ... 2012/05/08 20:00:10

Yep, i can see how you would think such a thing. You probably think that George W. Bush should be on Mount Rushmore, too. Geeesch!

HILLARY CLINTON 2016.

reply
Hillary... to mwg0735 2012/05/08 19:57:46

And you will still be a far right chauvinist. HILLARY CLINTON 2016. Get used to it.

reply
mwg0735 to Hillary... 2012/05/09 02:10:37
LadyBGood 2012/05/08 15:51:55 (edited)

no

+5
Barbara Olson, the conservative lawyer and commentator, used an Alinsky quote to open every chapter of her 1999 book, "Hell to Pay: The Unfolding Story of Hillary Rodham Clinton." Olson, who died in the Sept. 11 terror attacks, had charged in her book that the thesis was locked away because Clinton "does not want the American people to know the extent to which she internalized and assimilated the beliefs and methods of Saul Alinsky."

She has the same beliefs as obama...she is a socialist. I think she's a little more dangerous than obama...because she is hungry for power!

reply
ReconMa... to LadyBGood 2012/05/08 16:34:22
LadyBGood to ReconMa... 2012/05/09 01:16:10

+1
True!

reply
ReconMa... to LadyBGood 2012/05/09 01:22:25

+1
Yes she is, hon....:-)

reply
ant0n1us to LadyBGood 2012/05/08 18:26:42

+2
Rodham-Clinton and Mr. Obama are Democrats, but differ widely on key issues, including Palestinian statehood, healthcare, and civil rights. I do not know what "beliefs" have to do with politics. I only know about real things, like legislation, and action. "Beliefs" are for the religious discussions.

reply
LadyBGood to ant0n1us 2012/05/09 01:18:47

+1
I gave you a thumbs up....for G.P. I am not talking about their religions...they are both socialist-marxists. They are "do-gooders" who think they know what is best for US..because we are not capable of knowing what is (good for us). They are both selling us out! They both BELIEVE in the Alinsky rules!

reply
L1 2012/05/08 15:40:27

Undecided

+1
I really won't know until we get there and that's if she runs. I don't trust politicians much so I just can't say who just yet.

reply
JohnT 2012/05/08 15:35:27

Yes

+3
Yes I would support her nomination, she has worked hard as Secretary of State and is a very intelligent woman. The men can't seem to get the job done right in either party so most assuredly ready for change

reply
Tudie BN to JohnT 2012/05/08 15:41:25

+1
Thanks John !

reply
JohnT to Tudie BN 2012/05/08 16:18:12

+1
I think I am in the minority here, lots of political vitriol.

reply
Tudie BN to JohnT 2012/05/08 18:23:33

+1
LOL ! Me too !

reply
keeper 2012/05/08 15:27:25

no

+7

reply
marylou5 to keeper 2012/05/08 16:56:33 (edited)

+1
You never mince words and always hit the nail on the head!

reply
keeper to marylou5 2012/05/09 16:38:04

+1
Thank you, Marylou!!

reply
Scalded Eagle 2012/05/08 15:25:59

no

+6
Never again, no more commies.

reply
skroehr 2012/05/08 15:22:59 (edited)

no

+4
lmfao. No more Democrats at all, I'm afraid, until the party stops dictating their culture of death stance to their major candidates. And certainly not someone else who would remind me, or that has been associated with Bill Clinton, GW Bush, and Barack Obama.

20 years of troubled Presidents people. 20 years!! It is enough. How about just a nice regular, normal, constitutionally respectful president like Ford, Eisenhower, Ted Roosevelt, John Kennedy, Ronald Reagan? Do we ever really need another Clinton, Bush, or Obama? I pray not.

reply
SK-LIBERTY OVER EQUALITY 2012/05/08 15:22:00 (edited)

no

+6
Hopefully by then her and nancy pukosi will be cell mates.

reply
ReconMa... to SK-LIBE... 2012/05/08 16:40:14

+1
Well we know who would be the "male" in that cell...lol~!!!

reply
SK-LIBE... to ReconMa... 2012/05/08 16:46:42

+1
Yep! LOL

reply
ReconMa... to SK-LIBE... 2012/05/08 18:16:19

+1
lol~!!!

reply
sokoyah 2012/05/08 14:30:47

Yes

+1
she's cool

reply
Tudie BN to sokoyah 2012/05/08 14:45:22

Thanks Sokoyah !

reply
Mog of War 2012/05/08 14:25:04

Other

+7
If Obama wins in 2012 we may not have term limits anymore by 2016... or elections for that matter.

reply
ant0n1us to Mog of War 2012/05/08 18:30:37

The election of 2008 was the first fair Presidential election in over a decade. The Presidential election of 2000 was decided in the US Supreme Court, after Dubya's brother Jeb (then Governor of Florida), manipulated the recount. The Presidential Election of 2004 was replete with fraud in Ohio, in counties where more people "voted" for Bush than there were registered voters. Massive voter fraud and court pandering, instead of democracy! The election of 2008 was über clean by comparison. No Diebold fraud. No courts. A very clear margin in every state, and concurrence of the popular vote and electoral college vote. A textbook example of the democratic process.

reply
Mog of War to ant0n1us 2012/05/08 20:28:31

+1
"Manipulated the recount?" You mean refusing to consider all those Nader votes to be Gore votes? The whole "butterfly ballot" problem was a bunch of old people playing the age-card when they had buyers remorse for voting Nader instead of Gore, because they would not have voted for Nader had they realized how close the race got.

reply
Hillary... to Mog of War 2012/05/08 23:22:25

You don't have very much faith in our constitution, do you? With all due respect, such a scenario as you described is really silly - really silly, even for a Texan. Ooops!

reply
Mog of War to Hillary... 2012/05/12 02:32:21

Actually those who have little faith in the constitution would be those who feel that the election is invalid because the supreme court had to make a ruling... And maybe I was being a silly Texan, but the group of "Gore Supporters" saying they really meant to vote for gore, looked a lot like the same sorts of people which were voting Nader in Texas. So if it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, and speaks the same sort of rhetoric as a duck... why then we're looking at a duck perhaps.

reply
Hillary... to Mog of War 2012/05/12 06:09:30

Mog, it's highly unlikely that we can ever agree on this issue, but you are wrong. Trust me.)))

reply
**Bessie** 2012/05/08 14:13:15

no

+9
I'm sure I could never do that!

reply
ReconMa... to **Bessie** 2012/05/08 16:49:24

+1
Neither could I...

reply