If health care reform is right for America, why did 15 Senators need bribes? Who exactly got what?
- December 23, 2009 06:15:35
- Read all 289 opinions
President Obama, Harry Reid, and the Democrats in Congress said the health care reform bill is right for America. So why did so 1 in 4 senators need to be bribed to vote for it?
Sixty votes in favor did not come effortlessly. Fifteen senators wrangled special deals out of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid. In the end, 58 Democrats and 2 Independents voted in favor of the bill, to allow it to move back to the House and Senate for one more go round.
One-fourth voted in favor of the bill, not because of principles, but because they were bribed with money and pork earmarks for their states.
Who got exactly what? Here's the list, so far.
~ Sen. Ben Nelson (D-NE) won a provision exempting his state from paying the usual share of costs for new Medicaid patients. The deal, which critics have dubbed the "Cornhusker Kickback," is expected to cost the federal government $100 million over 10 years.
~ Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-LA) won an even larger break for her state -- an estimated $300 million in extra federal spending, in a move called the "Louisiana Purchase."
~ Sen. Carl Levin (D-MI) made sure that certain insurance companies in his state are off the hook from a new $7 billion dollar tax.
~ Sen. Chris Dodd (D-CT) got a kickback -- a $100 million bonus for the University of Connecticut.
~ Sen. Bernie Sanders (D-VT) dropped his concerns after Senator Reid offered his state a $10 billion grant for "community health centers," money that can be funneled to facilities that perform abortions.
~ Three states -- Pennsylvania, New York and Florida -- all won protections for their Medicare Advantage beneficiaries at a time when the program is facing cuts nationwide.
~ Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR) won a promise from Reid to support his plan to expand eligibility for health insurance.
~ Senators from Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming will get a "Frontier Freebie" -- they'll see an increase in Medicare payments to hospitals and doctors, because "at least 50 percent of their counties are ‘frontier counties,' defined as those having a population density less than six people per square mile."
~ Sen. Tom Harkin (D-IA), chairman of the Senate health committee, got a provision inserted to increase Medicare payments to certain "low-volume hospitals" in Grinnell, Keokuk and Spirit Lake, treating limited numbers of Medicare patients.
Democrats started to complain about the bribes, even before the final vote was cast. When Sen. Barbara Mikulski (D-MD) couldn't get past the reporters swarming Ben Nelson on her way to the cloture vote, she quipped, "I know I'm not as important as Senator Nelson. I didn't get the money for my state. I was too stupid."
Apparently, so was Harry. While Reid was manically brokering deals with 15 states on the fence, he neglected to do anything to help Nevada's bankrupt budget and crumbling economy. The Senate's most powerful leader forgot about the folks back home, where residents live in one of the 5 worst-ranked states in terms of health care, education, unemployment and stimulus funds.
But there is good news for the nation and Nevada: Harry Reid comes up for re-election in eleven short months. Nevadans will have a chance to topple the leader of bribing debauchery and turn their formerly purple state a brilliant shade of blood red.
Like this article? Add Kelly to your Sodahead friends to get notices of this original writer's articles, subscribe to her blog, and befriend Kelly on Facebook ("energizersnobabe").
Top Opinion
About Me
Recent Posts
- Watch out Reid: Nevada seniors want to retire you!
- GOT A PASSION AND THE URGE TO WRITE ABOUT IT?
- Beck praises Nevada's Tarkanian, calls him Tea Party radical, patriot (video)
- Reid burns millions on ads to improve image, but will it change Nevada's mind?
- Obama's budget freeze is "pie-eating economics:" It'll make US fatter, because it...
Hot Questions on SodaHead
-
What Was the Best Season Finale?
-
Who's the Meanest Reality TV Judge?
-
Hottest Woman on Maxim's Hot 100 List?
- View more slideshows »
The Latest From SodaHead
News
-
School Fined $15,000 for Selling Soda: Acceptable or Outrageous?
The federal government is reportedly suing Davis High School in Salt Lake City, Utah for accidentally selling soda to kids during lunch time.
-
PUBLIC OPINION > America Should Not Adopt a Fat Tax
Following Denmark's recent adoption of a "fat tax," researchers are suggesting that similar legislation could curb obesity in America. We asked the public if that would be a good idea.
Politics
-
Who Do You Think Will Ultimately Win the 2012 Election?
It's going to be a long, hard fight between Barack Obama and his likely GOP competitor, Mitt Romney. But who do you think will ultimately win?
-
Who Do You Think Currently Has the Upper Hand in the 2012 Election?
It's going to be a long, hard fight between Barack Obama and his likely GOP competitor, Mitt Romney. But who do you think currently has the upper hand?







POLITICIANS ARE GONNA GET MONEY AND WE ARE GETTING BRICKBATS!!!
I think the a$$hole knows he is not gonna be re-elected and this health care debacle is a thumb in the eye of his constituents and the American people, a scorched earth kinda thing.
Cheers
Linny
Institut economique Molinari
Dated: 7/4/09
Several leading European and Canadian health economists, physicians and scholars—in Washington recently for the Galen Institute’s conference, "Lessons from Abroad for Health Reform in the US"—met with analysts from the Heritage Foundation and other conservative think-tank leaders.
They wanted to explain why Americans should be concerned when officials push for government-controlled, universal health care coverage that includes innocuous-sounding but largely intrusive and prohibitive health measures.
"We were told single-payer health care would be a true liberation for Canada when they enacted it 40 years ago, and the opposite has become true," says Brian Lee Crowley, president of the Atlantic Institute for Market Studies in Canada.
Not only do Canadians face extraordinary wait times to get specialized treatments (the average wait time from getting a referral from a general practitioner to receiving a treatment was 17.3 weeks in 2008), but they also have limited access to new drugs, thanks in part to the country’s "comparative effectiveness" body known as the Common Drug Review, says Brett Skinner with the Fraser Institute.
Is it because it is more affordable there?
If we falter and lose our freedoms,it will be because we destroyed ourselves
Politicians in Canada or Europe for that matter, when runing for office do not talk much about replacing their public system with a private one.
I guess in the US we have the best doctors and hospitals in the world, but for many of us is like looking at a very expensive diamond at a jewlry store, out of reach....