If Barack Obama was white, would he have already been impeached?
KCurtis
2013/02/23 12:02:31
|
|
|||||
|
205 votes
|
|
54% | |||
|
178 votes
|
|
46% | |||
What is the reason behind the Teflon shield the Lame Stream Media, the Democrats and the Republicans protection of Obama?
The press continues to censor news to keep the rays of good intention on a President who has transparently disregarded our Constitution; who has destroyed our economy; who has started the destruction of our healthcare system. They have ignored his association with known criminals and radicals and allowed his records to go unchallenged with not a single investigative report on why Obama spends millions of dollars each year to hide his college transcriptions.
Even after a divided, disastrous first term where job loss was rampant and Democrats lost control over one of the 3 branches of government; low information voters re-elected Obama. Why?
The GOP has disregarded hundreds of thousands of people questioning blatantly forged documentation of Obama birth records, fake Social Security Number and many other facts about his questionable past. They have taken him to task with congressional hearings on Fast and Furious and Benghazi, but have never made a move to start impeachment for any of the crimes for which there is much evidence.
Even the Supreme Court has now illegally failed to disperse depositions to fairly review the questions around Barack Obama's shady past.
The press continues to censor news to keep the rays of good intention on a President who has transparently disregarded our Constitution; who has destroyed our economy; who has started the destruction of our healthcare system. They have ignored his association with known criminals and radicals and allowed his records to go unchallenged with not a single investigative report on why Obama spends millions of dollars each year to hide his college transcriptions.
Even after a divided, disastrous first term where job loss was rampant and Democrats lost control over one of the 3 branches of government; low information voters re-elected Obama. Why?
The GOP has disregarded hundreds of thousands of people questioning blatantly forged documentation of Obama birth records, fake Social Security Number and many other facts about his questionable past. They have taken him to task with congressional hearings on Fast and Furious and Benghazi, but have never made a move to start impeachment for any of the crimes for which there is much evidence.
Even the Supreme Court has now illegally failed to disperse depositions to fairly review the questions around Barack Obama's shady past.
Personally I think he's doing fine; a Hell lot better than the EU leaders, that's for sure.
President Obama has not been impeached because he has not committed an impeachable offense.
UHHH, DER TI DER!
IF BHO Sr is his biological father then he is
35% Arab
15% Black
3,000 years ago this group also included the Phoenicians, but today they aren't around.
The Semitic race belongs to the Mediterranean group of the Southern branch of the Europeoid race.
In this context ...the poster is saying that since Obama has a Muslim father...he is ARAB...actually Obamas father is from Kenya...so he is wrong anyway...I got this info from "encyclopedia123...or at least that is where i found the sub division of the Caucasoid's...I had not heard that before...must be relatively new...thanks!
Here it is even in Webster dictionary:
Semite 1a: a member of any of a number of peoples of ancient southwestern Asia including the Akkadians, Phoenicians, Hebrews, and Arabs.
Obama is no Arab anyway you slice it!
How many Arabs do you personally know?
I have known many Arabs, including many here in the US. Some of them have been born in the US, but they haven't stopped being Arabs because of that.
As for "many sources that said that Arab is a culture and a language, but not a race", it's laughable. Look for SERIOUS sources instead.
"While the Jewish people began with the descendents of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, many people have converted to become Jews over the millennia--beginning with the "mixed multitude" that came with us out of Egypt. Today there are African Jews, Japanese Jews, even Eskimo Jews. It seems difficult to call such a mixture a "race".
(Incidently, there is really no such thing as a "race." The term "race" implies to most people that there are different categories of human beings based on their genetic makeup. The fact is that there is no basis in genetics for these distinctions. For example, an African from one family may have more in common genetically with a Swede than with another African.)
What could be said is that we are a "family". A family can adopt others as their own. But there are conditions to adoption. You need to keep the family rules. In our case, those rules have to do with the mission we were given at Mount Sinai over 3300 years ago.
SOURCE CHABAD.ORG
And one human being may have more in common genetically with a mouse than with another human being.
Is it an indication that there are no such things as humans and mice? Are humans and mice the same?
I'm not kidding. And, by the way, I know what I'm talking about, as biology is my profession.
This false idea that there is no such thing as race appeared as a by-product of the Human Genome Project. This scientific project intended to map all the genes of the human genome. When the project started in 1990, the expected number of genes in the human genome was about 100,000. In 2000 it became already clear that the actual number is about 10 times less. Even more unexpected and puzzling was the finding that there are more differences in genetic makeup between the individuals of the same race than between different races. And more than that, there is so little difference between the genetic makeup of different species...
And one human being may have more in common genetically with a mouse than with another human being.
Is it an indication that there are no such things as humans and mice? Are humans and mice the same?
I'm not kidding. And, by the way, I know what I'm talking about, as biology is my profession.
This false idea that there is no such thing as race appeared as a by-product of the Human Genome Project. This scientific project intended to map all the genes of the human genome. When the project started in 1990, the expected number of genes in the human genome was about 100,000. In 2000 it became already clear that the actual number is about 10 times less. Even more unexpected and puzzling was the finding that there are more differences in genetic makeup between the individuals of the same race than between different races. And more than that, there is so little difference between the genetic makeup of different species (like humans, mice, flies, worms, wheat, etc.), that they can be easily mistaken for each other.
This is when the outlandish speculations that there is no such thing as race began.
In reality, what the Human Genome Project has uncovered is the fact that we still know very little about biology. Not that there is no such thing as race, but that the science at this stage is very far from the final knowledge.