Quantcast

If A State Had to Leave The Union, Which One Would You Want It To Be? Part 1

Platinum Fangs 2012/05/12 03:06:46
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Conneticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusets
You!
Add Photos & Videos
Add a comment above

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Waldorf 2012/05/12 12:41:15
    California
    Waldorf
    I would split the State first, as has already been suggested there. Southern California is a world unto itself.
  • Z 2012/05/12 05:53:58
    California
    Z
    Gonna lose it sooner or later as it is.
  • S* 2012/05/12 04:57:26
    Arizona
    S*
    Israel, is my choice. what happened to Utah? Why would anyone give just these silly states when the real treacherous ones are left off?
  • Platinu... S* 2012/05/13 07:16:34
    Platinum Fangs
    Check parts 2 & 3. Only 21 choices per poll.
  • S* Platinu... 2012/05/13 13:28:48
    S*
    I was not being critical, my comment was in tongue in cheek, vilifying any state, I was suggesting some were treacherous, when I do not believe them so. Have a great day.
  • Razoreye001 2012/05/12 04:08:01 (edited)
    Alaska
    Razoreye001
    Seriously could we sell Alaska back to the Russians? Then maybe we could give Mississippi back to the French as well?
  • Jay0Byrd 2012/05/12 04:04:37
    Kansas
    Jay0Byrd
    and after Kansas, lets see if Missouri will follow, and so on...
  • Z Jay0Byrd 2012/05/12 05:54:38
    Z
    Why would we leave?
  • Jay0Byrd Z 2012/05/12 06:12:46
    Jay0Byrd
    My first thought was, to avoid the silly State Taxes, and terrible Motor vehicle laws and driver's license laws, and mis-use of State funds
  • Z Jay0Byrd 2012/05/12 06:51:23
    Z
    Fair enough.
  • Dan 2012/05/12 03:34:03
    California
    Dan
    +1
    California.
  • Metaldane 2012/05/12 03:23:40
    Alabama
    Metaldane
    You actually don't have my real choice here I'd pick North Carolina
  • Platinu... Metaldane 2012/05/12 03:29:59
    Platinum Fangs
    Part 2 is now up
  • Savior Metaldane 2012/05/12 04:55:48
    Savior
    you know NC isn't the only state to ban gay marriage (if that's why you chose it)

    there are atleast 26 states with some form of gay marriage ban.

    I don't think the federal government should override the state's decisions, but I also don't think that any form of government should be in the insititution of marriage.
  • Metaldane Savior 2012/05/12 05:00:09
    Metaldane
    I know but I just dislike the south in general because of that it's why I'm happy my states going to be legalizing soon possibly within a month.
  • Savior Metaldane 2012/05/12 05:08:41
    Savior
    Do you have a valid argument for government to be in the institution of marriage?

    Just wondering.
  • Metaldane Savior 2012/05/12 06:47:54 (edited)
    Metaldane
    Right now it's needed if gov wasnt involved at all that'd be fine because then same sex marriage wouldn't need to be legalized but I want to get gay marriage legalized (no I'm not gay) and the best way right now is by working through state government
  • Savior Metaldane 2012/05/13 23:42:39
    Savior
    You know there has been more government involvement against same sex marriage, if you take the government out of it, you remove many of the benefits but anybody could get married, and not have to see if it's legal.
  • Metaldane Savior 2012/05/14 03:54:21
    Metaldane
    I'm still for the gov being involved Canada for example allow their gov to make laws regarding marriage the majority wanted same sex marriage so the gov made it law that the provincial and territorial governments must perform them I see no prob with that and I don't care bout your reasons you won't be changing my mind.
  • Savior Metaldane 2012/05/14 20:11:31
    Savior
    Okay if a government can say who can get married, what's to stop them from saying who CAN'T get married?
  • Metaldane Savior 2012/05/14 20:19:57
    Metaldane
    Public outcry if they do that the public goes against that decision and forces it to change but that's unlikely to happen they're not governed by one single person and progress doesn't often go backward plus if the gov is doin that theyve most likely done worse already that's when you overthrow the government.
  • Savior Metaldane 2012/05/14 20:22:21 (edited)
    Savior
    When a government is limited and not involved in every single aspect of life there would be no government to overthrow. Government only reflects demand of the people, whereas people set the demands, doesn't that mean people are more productive than government.
  • Metaldane Savior 2012/05/14 20:23:34
    Metaldane
    People would also have less power to change society
  • Savior Metaldane 2012/05/14 20:24:21
    Savior
    No, people would have more power.
  • Metaldane Savior 2012/05/14 20:26:01
    Metaldane
    Your opinion only like I said we aren't going to agree so just drop it and don't waste both our time.
  • DJPanicDC 2012/05/12 03:22:20
    Florida
    DJPanicDC
    Close call to Arizona but I would love the painted desert too much
    really I want to go back and let the 11 southern states go

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2014/12/20 17:58:21

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals