I knew it wouldn't take long for the glib libs to blame conservatives for the Sikh Temple shootings
Allbiz - PWCM - JLA
2012/08/06 01:24:52
Almost immediately after the recent shooting in Aurora, Colorado, where over a dozen people were killed during the premiere of ‘The Dark Knight,’ the media began trying to tie the suspect to the Tea Party. When that failed, others implied that loose gun laws were responsible for the mass-murder, arguing that stricter measures can prevent similar tragedies in the future.
Now, on the same day as the horrific attack on a Sikh Temple in Oak Creek, Wisconsin, Twitter users have already begun to imply that public figures like Michele Bachmann and Rush Limbaugh are somehow responsible.
Bachmann seemed to be the recipient of most of the allegations, presumably because of her calls to investigate the Muslim Brotherhood and its influence within the United States government.
Here are more:
Many of the Twitter users are seemingly oblivious to the fact that Sikhs are not, in fact, Muslims.
However, CNN explained Sunday that violence against Sikhs is often just misplaced Islamophobia. Sikhs are often mistaken for Muslims because of their distinctive appearance.
Top Opinion
-
NPC 2012/08/06 01:27:46



















But since the libs insist on TYING THINGS TOGETHER, hmmmmmmmmm
What about the DERANGED who believe these things,
Republicans want to DIRTY THE WATER,
Republicans want to DIRTY THE AIR.
They want the poor to pay all taxes so the rich wont pay a dime.
Sikhs are old fashioned people, just like the definition of a Conservative.
How do we know the shooter was not a DERANGED LIBTARD WHO BELIEVED HE WAS DOING THE RIGHT THING BASED UPON THE LIES FROM THE LEFT FOR 20 YEARS RUNNING.
Would the mind set of the shooter be of one who believes he SAVED MILLIONS OF AMERICANS
Time to BOYCOTT all news outlets who PUBLISH PROPAGANDA.
No similarities:
low shot
Cheers sweetpea.
Amazing how these wonderful people are never talked about in ObamaLand
back atcha
I just hate seeing my poll being hiu-jacked with senseless arguments.
But it was obvious this instance was going to be a far right hate crime.
Stop being so sensational about everything.
You are correct, though that hate is not a politcal trait. LRather, Liberals are born into and with it.
But in this instance, authorites have already determined that there was no radical group of any kind involved in any way and was the act of a solely the act of a sick minded individual.
Come on then cleverclogs... explain this grand theory.
Authorities said he was a member a radical far right group. Just because he was far right wing it doesn't mean you need to get defensive. It's a very strange trait you have.
Just because he was a member of a group doesn't mean the group was involved. That's a liberal hate tactic to make the claim he was.
Diverting from the issue at hand... conservative hate tactic?
"But it was obvious this instance was going to be a far right hate crime."
"Authorities said he was a member a radical far right group. Just because he was far right wing it doesn't mean you need to get defensive."
Either you suffer from Liberal flip-flopism, or you don't really know whay you're saying.
Someone can easily act on their own accord but still be part of a radical group. Plus this was a far right hate crime committed by a person.
Why don't you understand this? You seem unable to accept this.
Silly liberals aye
Don't much much about history, do you?
A desperate bid to stay relevant in this conversation. You lose, accept it and move on :)
Even Henry VIII, the first king to live full-time on the island didn't know how to speak English.
Oh, did I tell you I studied the history of the British monarchs at Oxford?
oh really? When did you study?
I'll give you points about modern English. But again, let's remember, modern English didn't evolve until into the 18th century.
And I'm still right. No over-reaction. Just a fact.
So either way modern English was invented by the English. Developed from other things. Plus we would also need to define quite what 'English' is... Who are the 'English' in terms of this.
But seriously this has been a nice diversion. But I'd recommend staying on topic, or just admitting you were wrong and move on. Every point you've made i've proven you wrong. Normally in such matters I don't really care, but your persistence is astonishing. Most people just admit fault and move on.
Your Saul Alinsky tactics lack effectiveness with me.