I just read a comment by a self-admitted "lifelong" conservative Republican SH, that to make an assertion that no one was killed by Nixon's "dirty tricks" related to Watergate ( as compared to Fast & Furious) is "not exactly true"...Agree or disagree?
J.W. Howler
2012/06/24 19:03:31
|
|
|||||
|
10 votes
|
|
7% | |||
|
137 votes
|
|
93% | |||
This particular "conservative Republican" is a consistent supporter of the Obama administration with his commentary across the Sodahead site.
He also asserts that Watergate was a much worse crime than any crime thus far alleged, or even known, relative to Fast & Furious -- even if MASS MURDER is undoubtedly one of those crimes.
He makes the claim that multiple murders as a result of Fast & Furious is less serious than an attempt to undermine the "U.S. process" as he asserts was the case with Watergate.
He believes history will view Fast & Furious as a comparable scandal to the Lewinsky scandal, and one that will give a negative historical view of Republicans.
What say YOU?
He also asserts that Watergate was a much worse crime than any crime thus far alleged, or even known, relative to Fast & Furious -- even if MASS MURDER is undoubtedly one of those crimes.
He makes the claim that multiple murders as a result of Fast & Furious is less serious than an attempt to undermine the "U.S. process" as he asserts was the case with Watergate.
He believes history will view Fast & Furious as a comparable scandal to the Lewinsky scandal, and one that will give a negative historical view of Republicans.
What say YOU?
Top Opinion
-
Elleryqueen 2012/06/24 19:08:03I DO NOT believe that someone may have been killed because of, or related to,...+27Watergate was a fairy tale compared to what has been going on for the last 3 plus years.





















Cross-referencing is sometimes necessary too.
I tend to check out more of that stuff than I do anything else on the site.
After a while you can easily observe the political mindgame, and the subtle seeds they attempt to plant while trying their damned-est to not blow their cover.
Thanks.
It serves as a good reminder to me.
No excuse here, Fast and Furious was a blunder. But realize that somewhere around 150,000 firearms a year have been estimated to cross the border each year into Canada and Mexico because of our criminally lax gun laws. Canadian estimates are that these result in 200-300 Canadian murders each year. The Mexican total is estimated at around 10,000. Fast and furious committed fractionally more guns to that mix but to assume that the cartels would not be armed without the F&F; firearms is WAY OFF BASE.
Because as of April 2012, just 68,161 guns have been traced to the US since Jan 2007.
Just a little over a third of your "annual" number in five years.
Averaging that gives us about 13,500 US guns per year to Mexico.
In fact just 68% of the guns Mexico sends to the ATF to trace because they believe they are from the US are actually from the US.
Are you really claiming that about 135,000 guns are smuggled into Canada each year to make up the difference?
The Cartels buy foreign made AK-47 machine guns in lots of 1000 for less than $100 per gun. They buy heavy machine guns, Grenades, and Rocket launchers from Military armories all through central and south america.
They get the vast majority of the weapons they use from those sources and use smugglers in the US to get things they have trouble getting from other sources.
They buy ammo for the full auto ak & M16 rifles in the US, and they buy 9mm, 357 mag, and 45acp handguns that are banned in Mexico.
They also buy the FN 5.7 pistols and then steal or buy from the Mexican Military the armor piercing ammo banned in the US.
It's that our Government handed 2000 guns to known criminal with absolutely no plans in place to track them.
Previous attempts with just a few hundred guns using tracking devices and authorities waiting in Mexico in case guns crossed the border, were complete failures.
What does it say about the competence of DOJ that they tried it with more than 3 times as many guns, no trackers, and no back up in Mexico?
Fast and Furious is like circus star who repeatedly fell trying to juggle 3 balls on the high wire, deciding the best way to learn the stunt is to remove the safety net and try to juggle 6 burning torches.
The part I cannot get past is they ordered the agents tracking the guns to let them cross into Mexico, knowing the had absolutely no ability to track them on that side of the border.
Their claimed goal of identifying the heads of the smuggling groups was simply impossible to achieve and I can't believe any of them could possibly be stupid enough to think it could.
Their operation consisted of get guns to smugglers, watch them enter Mexico, pick up guns from murder sites.
There is no way the goal was to identify leaders of the smuggling rings, because they chose not to watch only point in the gun's path where those leaders might be in contact with them.
That leaves me wondering if the actual goal of the operation wasn't something completely different.
Even a JV player would understand Basketball is played on both sides of the court.
And no I don't think this is a set up for gun laws.
I think it was an attempt to have guns they could point to.
When this operation started many in the Government were parroting that 90% of crime guns come from US gun shops BS.
But then the Department of Homeland Security and a few others that actually looked at the data stepped up and proved the claim to be false.
The Fast & Furious guns were something they could point to and say look, the guns used in this crime came from the US, we weren't wrong when we said the cartel guns come from here.
That said emails between agents prove they were planning to mention these guns while pushing for their multiple long gun purchase form regulation. That lends some weight to the paranoid theories.
At the very least they were planning to use the lost guns as evidence supporting the need for their new regulation.