"I Didn’t Vote for Obama in 2008, but I’ll be First To Do So in 2012" by Fay Paxton
I Didn’t Vote for Obama in 2008, but I’ll be First To Do So in 2012
(By Fay Paxton, cross-posted at The Pragmatic Pundit)
During the campaign, I was thousands of miles away, but as I watched it unfold, it was painfully obvious to me that America is nowhere near being post-racial and the southern strategy is not dead. I knew, that if elected, Barack Obama would become the object of the keenest scrutiny any President has ever been subjected to and his race, birthplace, indeed birthright and religion would dominate social concerns. America has not disappointed me.
It is sad to hear “disappointed” supporters wax naively about the President’s failures like political professionals who know everything about foreign policy, legislative bargaining and the government budgetary process. More often than not, I find they’re armed with little more than talking points, an entrenched ideology, reflections of an impossible ideal that borders close to God-like or are just plain old racists.
As I’ve watched President Obama labor against impossible odds, one thing became obvious to me, I would cast my vote for him in 2012 because his presidency calls upon all the ugliness that this nation needs to face. And there are other reasons:
1. I’ll vote for Obama because I like the idea that Wall Street has soured on the president. It tells me they didn’t get from him what they wanted and more importantly, because they’re withholding their support, he won’t be obligated to them. Besides, I have a problem with a group of grown men who have the nerve to feel sensitive after nearly toppling the entire economy.
Like the corporations that park their profits (profits they earned in America, from Americans) offshore because they want to be unregulated and untaxed, they’re holding the nation hostage. I’ll vote for Obama because I don’t want to pay the ransom.
From: CNN Money
Companies seek tax break for overseas profits
The tax holiday would lower the corporate tax rate to 5.25% for big companies such as the bill’s proponents — including Google, Oracle and Cisco — if they move their overseas profits to the United States.
Note: Generally, the U.S. corporate tax rate stands at 35%. I challenge anyone to name a corporation that pays 35% after all the tax cuts, tax credits, loopholes, deductions and subsidies. Costs are rising to do offshore business. Corporations are people…let them behave like all other American people and pay their taxes!
If you believe Obama’s policies are crippling when the stock market has reached an all-time high, you’re an idiot.
2. I’ll vote for Obama because I appreciate the distance of so many members of the 1%. They have made out like bandits and have the nerve to still be unhappy with their share. They receive all the tax cuts, tax credits and subsidies; still it isn’t enough. How much money does one person need?
Some complain that the wealthy pay 40% of the income taxes…they control 80% of the wealth, so I’m not certain they shouldn’t pay 80% of the taxes. If you live in this country, you pay taxes…buy a candybar.
3. I’ll vote for Obama to show the elite they can’t buy the government. The likes of Sheldon Adelson can give a candidate $20 million, but he still only has ONE vote. The Koch brothers can finance all the Tea Parties they desire, but in the end, they can each only submit one vote. Voters can defeat Citizens United. My vote for Obama will be a strike against corporate rule.
4. I’ll vote for Obama to uphold and celebrate the diversity that is America; to defy and deny all the racist rhetoric that has consumed the nation since his election. The divisive tactics politicians and the corporate media employ will continue as long as they know it works. I’ll vote to stop the deliberate attempts to drive a wedge between races, to stop disparage of minorities and the Gay community.
5. I’ll vote for Obama because the nation never respected his election, as if they had the right to disregard the votes of millions of Americans; to disavow their voting rights with the delegitimization of a candidate who was duly elected by the people.
Limbaugh: ‘I Hope Obama Fails’ 1/16/2009
GOP’s Anti-Obama Campaign Started Night Of Inauguration
‘If we’re able to stop Obama on this it will be his Waterloo’ 7/20/2009
The Plot Against Barack Obama 10/28/2010
6. I’ll vote for Obama because I’ve seen this Republican playbook before; when Clinton was in office and I can’t imagine how anyone could possibly forget, they were “the party of No” then too. Republicans even accused Clinton of murder.
They have no respect for the “whole” of America; they think they are the only ones who have a right to govern and will drive America to the brink of destruction for political gain. These were the headlines then:
Daily News 1990:
Legislators Say There’s No Money.
New York Times 1995
BATTLE OVER THE BUDGET: THE PRESIDENT; Budget Crisis Jeopardizes Clinton’s Diplomatic Plans
Los Angeles Times 1997
Clinton Office, Republican Congress Near an Impasse
CNN – 1995
Americans blame GOP for budget mess
Buffalo News 1995
GOP FRESHMEN AREN’T COMPROMISING
THIS OUTRAGEOUSLY PHONY BUDGET CRISIS
7. I’ll vote for Obama because I know history. After Blacks won office in 1875, whites reacted in much the same way many reacted after Obama’s election. Like the Tea Party, opposition groups were formed. They changed the registration rules, employed gerrymandering and wrote new laws. It was called the Mississippi Plan and Jim Crow was born. History is repeating itself.
8. I’ll vote for Obama because to me he isn’t the problem. He needs a Congress that wants to govern. He needs a party that supports his platform. He needs supporters who will stay engaged. I listen to the endless declarations about “disappointment” in the president and wonder how disappointed he is in his supporters who went homeand watched their hopes drown in “tea”.
“Change doesn’t roll in on the wheels of inevitability, but comes through continuous struggle.” Martin Luther King, Jr.
9. I’ll vote for Obama because I still believe “yes we can”. The ordinary citizen can make the difference. When I think about the worldwide support his candidacy elicited, I can’t help but think that America missed the opportunity to become the exception it claims to be had it not been more focused on the destruction of Obama than on the elevation of the nation.
10. I’ll vote for Obama because I don’t hold him responsible for the economy. Not only is he thesmallest spender since Eisenhower, but historytells us Republicans always “intentionally” sabotage the economy in order to extract huge sums of money from the working class.
Before the Great Depression, the U.S. Treasurer gave huge tax breaks to the wealthy. He believed,“The poor required little tax relief….they would just piss it away on food, clothing and shelter.”
For further Explanation, read #10 HERE
or read
Are Americans oblivious to History, stuck on Stupid or just ideological Idiots?
11. I’ll vote for Obama because Romney’s stint in politics as the Governor of Massachusetts proved he is incapable of transferring whatever he learned as a businessman to the management of a government economy, nor do I agree with his flippety-floppety positions; he makes it up as he goes.
Romney described himself as driven by a core economic credo, that capitalism is a form of “creative destruction.” What does that mean?
For further Explanation, read #11 HERE
and
Cory Booker and the Bain of Private Equity
12. I’ll vote for Obama because despite entrenched opposition and those who plotted against him even before he was sworn-in, he still accomplished so many things. I can only imagine what he could do with a little cooperation and support.
For further Explanation, read #12 HERE
Read More: http://www.winningprogressive.org/i-didnt-vote-for...
Top Opinion
-
Redneck Gal 2012/05/27 20:14:03Obama 2012+20I did vote for President Obama in 2008 and will certainly vote for him again in 2012.






















Magical mystery math from this administration is a smack in the face.
Sorry to disrupt your disingenuous political framing.
Also, close the loopholes & raise the rate on corporations who outsource American jobs to other countries?
As to the second question: close the tax/other loopholes so corporations can afford to keep jobs in this country .....
Oh, they can afford it.
Plus, the more Americans that are employed - the more Americans pay taxes & pump consumer money back into our economy. People in India earning American dollars are going to spend that money in India.
_____
I couldn't agree with you more... we need to get the now over 23 million under and/or un-employed back to work ... the sooner the better... and it doesn't seem Obama has done such a good job of that, yes?
I honestly do not believe Obama has a clue, and I don't totally blame him for his failures ... I blame the citizens who voted for the man who had no corporate business background on his resume at all.... a Jr. Senator with only 1.5 yrs experience, and most of that time he did not even show up to vote .. does not deem him qualified to be the President ... and in the last 3.5 yrs. his record as President is so abysmal, he can't even run on it, and if you've noticed, isn't discussing it ... his only choice is to change his narrative against his opponent by beating up on him .... and frankly that's the only thing I see anywhere near the so called "transparency" he promised ... and it's sad and disgusting all at the same time ... sad because had the GOP not screwed Hillary of the nomination, and Obama had waited another 4-8 yrs and got some experience under his belt, he may very well have been a good president ... he was j...
_____
I couldn't agree with you more... we need to get the now over 23 million under and/or un-employed back to work ... the sooner the better... and it doesn't seem Obama has done such a good job of that, yes?
I honestly do not believe Obama has a clue, and I don't totally blame him for his failures ... I blame the citizens who voted for the man who had no corporate business background on his resume at all.... a Jr. Senator with only 1.5 yrs experience, and most of that time he did not even show up to vote .. does not deem him qualified to be the President ... and in the last 3.5 yrs. his record as President is so abysmal, he can't even run on it, and if you've noticed, isn't discussing it ... his only choice is to change his narrative against his opponent by beating up on him .... and frankly that's the only thing I see anywhere near the so called "transparency" he promised ... and it's sad and disgusting all at the same time ... sad because had the GOP not screwed Hillary of the nomination, and Obama had waited another 4-8 yrs and got some experience under his belt, he may very well have been a good president ... he was just a little boy given a grown up mans job.. and he couldn't, and hasn't, handled it well ... nor can he if he's given another 4 yrs... that's how I see it, and my mind can't be changed.... the only change I want to see is who our next president is...
Nope.. no matter how hard he begs for another 4 years... it's over for him... or it's over for America! If he were in the private sector, he would have been fired at the end of his first year...
If Obama was a dictator, he could make this happen. However, he has to deal with "Waterloo" DeMint, McConnell's "goals, Eric "Cannot", The Orange Speaker and the rest of the anti-American GOTea who want the USA to fail under a Democrat POTUS named 'Hussein'.
Now, since I don't deify Wall Street, I'll vote for the candidate who has the American People's best interests at heart.
I'm sorry but, Romney is not the answer for me. My mind won't be changed on that. Since the GOP caused most of these problems & have no interest in fixing these problems, I'm voting 'Democrat' across the board. Bonus points, if the candidates are truly Liberal & Progressive.
But, hey.... funny pictures, huh? Keep those coming.
Every sane America sees through this GOP "Party Above Country" plot and will address it accordingly this November.
The pain is real. However, it's a bit disingenuous to blame the one person that's trying to help.
Obama's failure: Entertaining the false notion of bipartisan at the most critical moment in our time since the Great Depression.
Now, why are we talking about racism...?
"If Obama was a dictator, he could make this happen. However, he has to deal with "Waterloo" DeMint, McConnell's "goals, Eric "Cannot", The Orange Speaker and the rest of the anti-American GOTea who want the USA to fail under a Democrat POTUS named 'Hussein'."
...there is no way anyone can convince me that racism doesn't exist in the GOP/FOXNews/Beck/Limbaugh bubble - especially in the last four years.
The GOP is salty because the Dems beat the GOP to the Large Voting Tent. Why didn't the GOP nominate Steele or Keyes in 2008?
Either way, the Dems was going to make history & increase their voting tent with either Hillary or Obama.
The GOP's only comeback was to dig their heels in & bring America to a grinding halt and blame it on the Dems. Hillary would've caught this too had she won - talk about the "GOP's War on Women".
I don't call "anyone who disagrees with Obama" a racist. I have a few caveats with the POTUS, myself.
However, people who bring faceless accusations and call his wife a monkey (or whatever).....well, I call that what that really is.
You're not racist. I believe that.
Let's not pretend that it doesn't exist and that it's not a factor.
Hmm, I think I'm going to blame McConnell and his historic record of Senate filibustering.
Obama didn't get everything he wanted - not by a longshot.
Even the ACA is a big win for privatized medicine 7 health insurance. It's basically Romneycare.
I wanted Single-Payer, or at least the Public Option.
Almost everything has been watered down by the GOP, decimating the intended effectiveness what was ever proposed.
America sees the GOP holding America's recovery hostage just to spite one man. November will be interesting, indeed.
The GOP hasn't produced a better nominee.
The Bush Tax Cuts were implemented & jobs still went overseas - during wartime.
Ten years later, we're screwed & being manipulated into believing that repealing these Bush Tax Cuts was "Socialism" or some other made-up B.S.
In order to help save the MIddle Class from nonexistence, keep them in place for the Middle Class and lower while repealing them on the %1 percent jackasses that's been scamming the rest of us since Reagan was sworn in.
You're a CPA. Wouldn't you have extensive knowledge about the Bush Tax Cuts?
You are the first person I've ever heard that says repealing them is socialism.
Don't worry about the 1%, 129,000 less millionaires in America, means less people to villianize.
I'm against the corruptors & criminals in the 1%.
"You are the first person I've ever heard that says repealing them is socialism."
Then, you must not follow politics closely.
I'm not into op eds aka spin aka opinion based politics.
I cannot see a connection between the Bush tax cuts and socialism. It wouldn't be the first time I have not been able to connect the dots at first impression.
Can you enlighten me?
I'm against ALL criminals and corruptors regardless of net worth.
No sane person (including myself) can. It doesn't meant that myths like that are floated out there in the political arena.
This isn't about me enlightening you on the connection. It's about me reminding you that people are disingenuously making that false connection for political gain in order to get out of paying their fair share of taxes.
"I'm against ALL criminals and corruptors regardless of net worth."
This, we have in common.
Who said this?
http://neosecularist.com/2011...
http://www.nationalfreedomfor...
http://startthinkingright.wor...
http://socialismdoesntwork.com/
obama has only taken a "bad" situation and made it 9 times worse! :(
Reagan enacted lower marginal tax rates in conjunction with simplified income tax codes and continued deregulation. During Reagan's presidency the annual deficits averaged 4.2% of GDP after inheriting an annual deficit of 2.7% of GDP in 1980 under President Carter. The rate of growth in federal spending fell from 4% under Jimmy Carter to 2.5% under Ronald Reagan. GDP per working-age adult, which had increased at only a 0.8% annual rate during the Carter administration, increased at a 1.8% rate during the Reagan administration. The increase in productivity growth was even higher: output per hour in the business sector, which had been roughly constant in the Carter years, increased at a 1.4% rate in the Reagan years.
The national unemployment rate rose from because of the Carter administration to 10.8% in 1982, then declined to 5.4% in 1988. The inflation rate declined from 10% in 1980 to 4% in 1988.
England Prime Minister Margret Thatcher recalled Ronald Reagan by saying:
"He was a man who mended America's wounde...
Reagan enacted lower marginal tax rates in conjunction with simplified income tax codes and continued deregulation. During Reagan's presidency the annual deficits averaged 4.2% of GDP after inheriting an annual deficit of 2.7% of GDP in 1980 under President Carter. The rate of growth in federal spending fell from 4% under Jimmy Carter to 2.5% under Ronald Reagan. GDP per working-age adult, which had increased at only a 0.8% annual rate during the Carter administration, increased at a 1.8% rate during the Reagan administration. The increase in productivity growth was even higher: output per hour in the business sector, which had been roughly constant in the Carter years, increased at a 1.4% rate in the Reagan years.
The national unemployment rate rose from because of the Carter administration to 10.8% in 1982, then declined to 5.4% in 1988. The inflation rate declined from 10% in 1980 to 4% in 1988.
England Prime Minister Margret Thatcher recalled Ronald Reagan by saying:
"He was a man who mended America's wounded Spirit! To restore the stength of a Free World... and freed the slaves of Communism!" She went on to say in her final words, "We left here, still move in twilight.... but we have ONE BEACON to guide us that Ronald Reagan never had..... We have his example!"
So... does the educated, intelligent and truly GOOD person of this world look to hear the lies and false statements of a person like you to tear down one of the Greatest Presidents America has ever had...... OR, do we listen to the words of a Margaret Thatcher?
I chose Margaret! :)