Quantcast

I cannot vote for Barrack Obama. I cannot stand Mitt Romney. I love our country. Will our country be better off without the Democratic Party?

the_old_coach 2012/06/03 15:31:49
I will need a clothespin, please.

Someday I hope that the two-party system in our country is Republicanism and Libetrarianism. THAT battle will improve our country.

The Democratic Party is bad for our country. Socialism here in the States with appeasement overseas? No. NO NO NO NO NO.


holding my nose with a clothespin
You!
Add Photos & Videos

Top Opinion

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • wolf sloan 2012/06/04 19:44:19
    wolf sloan
    +1
    Slightly. Besides the president, there are certain cabinet positions,czars and other assorted cronies that need to be replaced.
  • Freedom Mom 2012/06/04 02:45:36
    Freedom Mom
    +2
    Ron Paul is America only hope. Mitt Ronmey is a socailist, and CFR member as Obama is. I must share thi bit of info for those who maybe unaware of the power behind the trown of Both Parties that Ron Paul will not be a part of that is one big reason he will get my total support.
    CFR- Council Of Foreign Relations founded in July in NY city by Col. Eward Mandell House, Chief Advisor to Woodrow Wilson in league with the same stockholders of the Federal Reserve. Edward Mandell House, socialist, wrote a book, Philip Dru: Adminisrrator, that he was working for "Socialism as the dream of Karl Marx." He told of a "conspiracy" which would gain control of both political parties, and use them as Instruments in the creation of a socialist world government. (John Mcmanus, The insiders, pg.7.
    Conspirecy? or Reality?
    The CFR's Study No. 7 published November 25, 1959, openly declared its true purpose:...building a New Internatioal Order (which) must be responsive to world aspirations for peace, (and) for social change..and economic change..an international Order (code for world government)...including states labeling themselves as "Socialist." One could safely say that the CFR is "to bring about a New World Order through the maniuplation of U.S. foreign policy and relations and through interna...
    &&&



    &
    Ron Paul is America only hope. Mitt Ronmey is a socailist, and CFR member as Obama is. I must share thi bit of info for those who maybe unaware of the power behind the trown of Both Parties that Ron Paul will not be a part of that is one big reason he will get my total support.
    CFR- Council Of Foreign Relations founded in July in NY city by Col. Eward Mandell House, Chief Advisor to Woodrow Wilson in league with the same stockholders of the Federal Reserve. Edward Mandell House, socialist, wrote a book, Philip Dru: Adminisrrator, that he was working for "Socialism as the dream of Karl Marx." He told of a "conspiracy" which would gain control of both political parties, and use them as Instruments in the creation of a socialist world government. (John Mcmanus, The insiders, pg.7.
    Conspirecy? or Reality?
    The CFR's Study No. 7 published November 25, 1959, openly declared its true purpose:...building a New Internatioal Order (which) must be responsive to world aspirations for peace, (and) for social change..and economic change..an international Order (code for world government)...including states labeling themselves as "Socialist." One could safely say that the CFR is "to bring about a New World Order through the maniuplation of U.S. foreign policy and relations and through international interdependence."
    Isn't that was is happening today? These CFR members control 90% of your Federal government, EPA, Department of Energy, Department of Education, Department of State, US Military, Media, Labor Union leaders, Federal Reserve, Banking Institutions, United States House Of Represenatives, United States Senators in (both parties) (CSIS)- Center For Stragic & International Studies, Department of Ambassadors, Federal Judicial Center, Us Arms Control & Disarmament Agency, Industry, National Science Foundation, Library of Congress, Office of Science & Technology, Export Bank, Whitehouse Staff, African Development Foundation, Treasury Department, Office of US Trade Repesenative, US Institute for Peace, Judiciary, Office of Technology Assement, CFR Senior Research staff.

    The CFR's Annaual Report in 1974, says the project for the CFR in the 80's will be "The management of the international economy, global poverty,enviroment and the new "common"...the oceans, the seabeds, and space, and Interstate violence, including arms control. What they are saying: "Is the management of your money, Your land, Your groceries and your guns."

    "The CFR is the establishment, Not only does it have influence and power in decision-making at the highest levels of government to apply presure from above, but it also finances and uses individuals and groups to bring presure from below, to justify the high level decisions for converting the U.S. from sovereign Constitution Republic into a servile member of one-world-dicatorship." I think its not only the Democrats we have to worry about, these memebrs are also in the Republican party also they hide behind labels just like Mitt Romney, Gingich, Carter, Wilson, Bush Sr, Bush Jr, Clinton Bill & Hillary, Harry Truman, Johnson, Nixion, Robert Rubin, Bruce Babbit,Anthony Lake, Donna Shela set the NWO agenda in Africa,
    (more)
  • Arizona1950 2012/06/03 21:15:15 (edited)
    Arizona1950
    +3
    Yes the country would be better off with the entire DEM/GOP Progressive Party.

    No need to hold your nose vote Ron Paul

    or vote for another liar-in-chief ... your call.



  • Rebel Yell 2012/06/03 20:48:19
    Rebel Yell
    According to Grover Norquist, the GOP point man, all the Republicans need is someone with enough working digits to hold a pen.

    It must be exciting for you Republicans that your candidate meets that incredibly low bar.
  • Spider20 2012/06/03 18:56:26
    Spider20
    +1
    I hear people say that, so often they feel their vote is between the lesser of evils, or offers no real choice when they go to the polls
    Sad that so many feel this way....wake up there, DC
  • Jackie G - Poker Playing Pa... 2012/06/03 18:25:34
    Jackie G - Poker Playing Patriot
    +1
    There are no perfect candidates; Romney is a proven leader, proven manager, proven economic success with a record of accomplishments - damn side better than Obama or any other candidate who has run. Is he perfect - hell no; has everything he has ever done been perfect with perfect out comes- NO - but his record shows huge success and right now we desperately need someone who actually gets things done.
  • Stacie 2012/06/03 18:08:58
    Stacie
    +1
    The answer is heartbreaking, but also quite simple -

    We will not have a country left if Obama, aka the Democratic party, remains in office.
  • lonewolf 2012/06/03 17:28:23
    lonewolf
    +3
    better believe it. obama is a jackass and mitt is no better. let's go ron
  • gregory.ditzler 2012/06/03 17:21:17
    gregory.ditzler
    well would you prefer Fascism instead?
  • rdmatheny gregory... 2012/06/03 17:57:45
    rdmatheny
    +3
    It's just as bad.
  • Dan ☮ R... gregory... 2012/06/03 18:15:10
    Dan ☮ R P ☮ 2012 ☮
    +4
    Fascism and Socialism are two sides of the same coin of collectivism, which is inherently opposed to the individualistic principles and rights this country was founded upon.
  • gregory... Dan ☮ R... 2012/06/03 20:58:33
    gregory.ditzler
    Fascism is inherently conservative because it requires corporate control over all aspects of society that can only be accomplished in a free market. Collectivism vs. Individualism is a false paradigm because there is too much overlap and anyone could argue either is better than the other.
  • Dan ☮ R... gregory... 2012/06/03 22:09:45 (edited)
    Dan ☮ R P ☮ 2012 ☮
    +3
    Fascism is simply the partnership of state and government, and their rhetoric is going to rally people behind nationalism. Communism is the merger of state and corporations, and instead of nationalistic rhetoric, they tend to use incremental ism and government mandates and monopolies to obtain control. Either way, a central party, almost always created by the ruling elite, controls the people.

    Such power cannot be achieved in a true free market system and lawful society. Such power is only obtainable through corrupt activities, like bribing public officials for unfair trade advantages. Unfair trade advantages are what allows a corporation or bank to grow unchecked. Throw away unfair advantages, and newer businesses, even small ones can challenge them.

    And there is no overlap. Collectivism is the idea that the group is more important than the individual, and more often than not the leadership dictates what is in the best interest of the group. Individualism is simply the idea that individual rights are most important.
    And you can argue whatever you want. Some would even argue Hitler was right. But the fact that you can argue and defend your position doesnt mean you are right.
  • gregory... Dan ☮ R... 2012/06/04 01:13:57
    gregory.ditzler
    The problem most conservatives cant seem to understand about the free market is that it is a wild west scenario, there is nothing to stop corporations from doing as they please and that means make profits at whatever expense to the public they could afford. This leads to a strong divide between the rich and the poor and if no one acts in favor of the poor to shield them from the rich with regulation providing true equality of opportunity.

    The one problem you encounter in your argument is assuming their has ever been a true Communist country which there hasn't been because it is virtually impossible on paper so you end up with Straw Communists like the Chinese. If you look at the foundation of Fascism in Italy it started as a Capitalist movement that was strongly opposed to Communism and in a Fascist society the corporations are the ruling class and a collection of corporations exploit the poor and select groups of undesirables. Communism is the democratic ownership of all factors of production ran by an elected government.
  • Dan ☮ R... gregory... 2012/06/04 02:16:23 (edited)
    Dan ☮ R P ☮ 2012 ☮
    +2
    "stop corporations from doing as they please and that means make profits at whatever expense"
    You cant charge people in a corporation with murder, manslaughter, reckless endangerment, or other forms of crimes? Free market doesnt mean the corporations are exempt from rule of law. Our current system, which is not free market, replaces proper punishment with phoney fines that amount to nothing in comparison to their profits. We even have shielding laws on some corporations to completely shield them from being sued.
    Its quite clear you dont know what free market truly is.

    "Communism is the democratic ownership of all factors of production ran by an elected government."
    Which will never happen. Even if it did, we have political party systems to keep the people in line, and electronic voting machines to rig the elections, and schools that ill instill the values of the government, just like we have in America. In fact, its not surprising that America now has several problems associated with communism, since we have been supporting main tenants of the communist manifesto, like a central bank and centralized education.
    And democracy is a heavily flawed system. You need special rules to prevent the majority from adversely affecting minorities, or else the system just becomes tyranny by mob rule.
  • gregaj7 2012/06/03 16:51:44
    gregaj7
    +5
    Ron will either be the GOP nominee or the "election" will be irrelevant.
  • the_old... gregaj7 2012/06/04 04:01:55
    the_old_coach
    +2
    I agree.
  • Daniel 2012/06/03 16:43:01
    Daniel
    +1
    Financially yes and morally yes. Wait, that means they contribute nothing.
  • FAWKES' NOOSE ~ ΔTX 2012/06/03 16:29:48
    FAWKES' NOOSE ~ ΔTX
    Which Socialist Program would you like to get rid of first?

    Social Security? Be sure to send back your parents' check every month.
    Medicare? Pay Grandma's medical bills yourself.
    Public Education? Send your kids to Catholic School. Its only about $10,000 per year.

    Pick one for starters. No Vouchers - No Overhauls. These are Socialist Ideals and must be eliminated, right?
  • Daniel FAWKES'... 2012/06/03 16:54:33
    Daniel
    +1
    Every last one of them, and for your information social security originally wasn't one of them until the Democrats drained it and abused it. For thirty years I paid my social security and I've got 20 years to go. My dad paid his as did my grandfathers. It's the sorry lazy bastards sitting on their asses sucking us dry. Of course the Liberals protect them by making them equal to those who worked all their lives and will never even get back near what they paid in. If you can't tell the difference slap stupid on your forehead.
  • FAWKES'... Daniel 2012/06/03 20:00:13
    FAWKES' NOOSE ~ ΔTX
    Get a clue. Social Security was FDR's Flagship Socialist Act. It is the largest Government Social Program in the world.

    So you'll be opting out of it then?
  • Schläue~© 2012/06/03 16:18:08
    Schläue~©
    +1
    Labels are meaningless as political party's are infiltrated and hijacked as soon as they are formed.
    The last, true muti-party election for President was in 1860 ... a 4-way race which Lincoln won with just under 40% of the popular vote.

    We were at a crossroads in the 1850's, very similar to what we face today.
    The direction of this nation for the next 50 years will be determined by this election.

    There is no "perfect candidate" because we are such a divided nation, as we were 150 years ago, but even the TEA Party of 2009-current, realizes that this election is far too important for experimentation and we cannot afford to blow this chance.

    If by some chance, 0bozo or a replacement Marxist is sitting in the Oval Office on Jan. 20, 2013 .... all bets are off and we may as well kiss the United States of America .... good-bye .... for good.
  • jacob crim 2012/06/03 15:53:49
    jacob crim
    +2
    The country would be better off without the democratic and republican party.
  • Mark In Irvine 2012/06/03 15:33:23
    Mark In Irvine
    +1
    a vote for Ron Paul is a vote for Mitt Romney
  • rdmatheny Mark In... 2012/06/03 18:03:58
    rdmatheny
    +4
    I have no idea where you came up with that absurd analogy. A vote for Ron Paul is a vote for constitutional governance and a restoration of freedoms and liberties. Period.
  • Dan ☮ R... rdmatheny 2012/06/03 18:19:17
    Dan ☮ R P ☮ 2012 ☮
    +4
    Either he's making a poor joke, or is speaking to the democrats that want to crossover to vote for Paul (since he's the only real anti-war candidate, among other reasons), and using the same flawed logic neocons have when they say "a vote for Ron Paul is a vote for Obama".

    Realistically, that only works if someone is entitled to your vote and you take it away from them, but no one is entitled to your vote. Any vote is only for who you voted for, and no one else.
  • rdmatheny Dan ☮ R... 2012/06/03 18:37:30
    rdmatheny
    +4
    It must be that "short bus" humor that I clearly do not understand.

News & Politics

2013/05/22 19:47:11

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals