HR347 - 1ST AMENDMENT RT BECOMES A FELONY
“A funny thing happened on the way to stop Obama from signing HR 347 …”
by Frank Gormlie on March 9, 2012
A funny thing happened on the way to figuring how to get President Obama not to sign HR 347. Yesterday late afternoon, I was on an urgent national conference call to discuss how to stop the bill. HR 347 is a bill that was passed with lightening speed with almost no opposition just recently by the Senate and House.
During the call, we were told that the bill is on President Obama’s desk and that he had until March 12th to sign it or veto it. This national phone connect was a “call to action” against the bill.
The bill has been nicknamed the “anti-Occupy Wall Street” bill, the “No Trespass” bill, the “end of dissent” law, and various other terms to describe its potential draconian effects on protest and dissent in America. It authorizes restricted zones where all protest is banned in and around government buildings and facilities, and bans protest around those receiving Secret Service protection. It does more and I’ve included its text – scroll down. “It kills protest around these people,” a moderator flatly stated at the beginning of the call.
So, a funny thing happened while on this conference call to urgently figure out what we could to prevent Obama from signing it. After all, he was a constitutional law professor before he became a politician.
During the conference call, a woman broke in, and said: “I have some very bad news. Obama signed this bill – HR 347 – March 8th – The bill was now LAW!
This depressing news set us all back and changed the tenor and attitudes expressed over this national network of activists.
On the phone we had folks from Georgia, Connecticut, New York, DC, Salem Oregon, southern Massachusetts, Minnesota, Detroit, Dallas, Oakland, Indiana … and San Diego, of course. Most of those hooked up to this line were or are involved with the Occupy movement, and in fact, the call had been set up by Occupy activists in Washington, DC – (including San Diego’s own Michael B. – whose voice I recognized 3,000 miles away).
The earlier urgency we had all expressed evaporated. In its place was exasperation and despair. But for many on the phone call, their determination remained. So, it wasn’t really a “funny thing” that had happened – no, more like a devastating thing had happened – but it sure was ironic.
These points about HR 347 and its Senate companion SB were made. It severly curtails protests, and keeps us from protesting the very people who are responsible for putting the country where it’s at today. It’s restrictions apply to some government functions. It criminalizes protest around federal buildings and agencies – even those in a labor strike could be subject to criminal charges.
We were not certain when the bill actually goes into effect, but we believed that unless The Senate passed it with unanimous consent and there were only 3 “nay” votes in the House, there’s a challenging road ahead for those who wish to repeal it. Within the bill itself there isn't any language indicating EXACT date the bill - NOW LAW - will officially go into effect but most likely will do so on January 1, 2013.
Still, troubling aspects of the new law are certainly disquieting. The signified “special events of national significance” could be the political party conventions coming up, or the Super Bowl. People could be banned from protesting any government or quasi-government function that the Department of Homeland Security decides upon.
Plus, protesters could be arrested in these restricted zones even if they didn’t know it was a crime to be there. If convicted of being in a restricted zone, you’d get a misdemeanor – but it would be a felony if there was some kind of weapon – would a Swiss Army knife do the trick? – or if there were injuries … The felony conviction calls for up to 10 years of imprisonment – certainly a chill on dissent.
A news anchor sounding alot like Dan Rather – stated that the near-unanimous consent and speed with which this bill was passed by Congress and now signed into law shows the degree to which the President and the governing elites believe the American people are tired of the Occupy Movement. The new law bans protests that the movement has targeted over the last 6 months.
Halfway through its second hour, the conference call seemed to be winding down. Most wanted to think about the law and what to do, now that the urgency had vanished. What would you propose?
Here’s the text of the bill that actually was passed by both houses:
H.R.347 — Federal Restricted Buildings and Grounds Improvement Act of 2011 (Enrolled Bill [Final as Passed Both House and Senate] – ENR)
One Hundred Twelfth Congress of the United States of America























https://www.federalregister.g...
HR347 has nothing to do with OWS. There was no condemnation of their actions emanating from the White House or Capitol Building. So it must be aimed at that other bunch of terrs, the ones that have been condemned before, veterans, taxpayers, church goers, gun owners, last but not the least, foes of abortion. Is it safe to toss in global warming deniers?
I don't see this a comparable to 1984. This has nothing to do with covert surveillance or eavesdropping.
It is almost a "Go Directly To Jail" statute.
People have long complained about the Patriot Act. But I am beginning to get the idea that it was not all that bad. It is was that bad, why the need for these 2 laws.
1. A month or two ago, the National Defense Authorization Act was passed and it provided for unlimited detention without a trial if suspected of being a terrorist.
2. Now HR 347, appears to call any expression of disapproval as grounds for prison.
Keep in mind that Islamic terrs were given the Constitutional rights accorded to American citizens, by specific legislation.
American citizens have lost our traditional Constitutional rights, yet Islamic terrs still get them.
Anyway, yes, I knew this was coming.
But great minds think alike.
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/...
For the most part, OWS did not protest in areas covered by this bill and theoretically, they were protesting against Wall Street.
Besides, it appears that voter intimidation laws do not apply to Black Panther types and maybe not to any minority.
Regarding H.R. 347 I amazed surprised and disappointed that the Republican-controlled House of Representatives passed it. It is obviously unconstitutional and its enforcement will violate the First Amendment on three levels: Denying the right to freedom of speech; denying the right to freedom of peaceable assembly; and denying the right to petition the government for change. I will be surprised if the first time it is enforced against peaceful protestors it isn't struck down.
One area the Supreme Court is not all that divided on is on the enforcement of the Bill of Rights. While they may not agree on some details as to what free speech is, e.g. when it comes to pornography, there can be no question that the attempt to stifle peaceful protests is a blatant violation of the First Amendment.
I agree with all except the part about the first time it is enforced it will be struck down. We know that authorities love to charge you with all they can. They use as many charges as they can find. They could use 3 I know of against the the person, this one, the patriot act and NDAA. If they did that, especially NDAA, you are toast. With NDAA you get no rights to a trail right off the bat, so there is nothing to "strike down".
I don't think you quite understand how the Patriot Act and NDAA work or else you would realize that with those there is no going before court to strike down anything.
It will be interesting to see how silent protesters with signs at Obama campaign events are treated.
However, it can be quite contraire....in re: of what is happening out here starting this week in our "red zone", and if the protests get out of control, and let's just say, hypothetically, in the future ML is called if Oblunder feels IT can't win, and declares ML, that would be very bad for anyone to protest or enter any meeting/proceedings to exercise their "freedom of speech and the right to assemble" at any governmental building, I am sure that will be included in some form of an amended version to include State, City, County, Library, Teacher's, heck anything; as the link provided was a green light on Jan, 3, 2012. Don't mean to be the Devil's advocate here, but it very well could happen.
With ya, on that latter. Jack provided a great video in re: of silent, then it didn't get so silent. I will provide a link for you on that.
http://www.sodahead.com/unite...
"A free people ought not only to be armed, but disciplined..." GEORGE WASHINGTON
“Thomas Jefferson said, “….What country before ever existed a century & a half without a rebellion? & what country can preserve it's liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as to facts, pardon & pacify them. What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots & tyrants. It is it's natural manure….”
"We, the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow men who pervert the Constitution." Abraham Lincoln