How To Explain Gay Rights To An Idiot

yet you won't find any rationnal reasons to your hate.

What makes being gay wrong, again? I'm sure you'll be so stupid that you will talk about an imaginary friend you call god or something like that

I pity you, being so obsessed about how others people have sex

Oh, now I see I'm dealing with an Atheist. That explains a lot.

Yeah, you know, rational people are rational !

I think we're done talking.

unfortunately, you'll still vote someday. Maybe you'll be repair until then, but I doubt it. Wish there's still hope for the ones in your family that can be

People just don't get it they think they "can teach logic to liberals" when it comes to gay marriage and their arguments against it, nothing makes sense or has any logic they go from two consenting of age humans getting married to people marrying objects or animals.

How about consenting of age humans marring multiple partners.Probably doesn't make sense or has any logic to you.

Because multiple partners is not marriage it breaks one of the bonds of marriage, the purpose of marriage is to being two people together for the rest of their lives and they share eachother. The whole sisterwives thing your bringing up most of the time well pretty much all the time the girls in those communities have no choice and say who they marry and a lot of times are underage.

I think multiple partners, in the event that all partners involved are giving fully informed consent, is fine. It's a free country.

Because first of all, you have to shed the attitude; I think that's what some people object to, more than the actual sexual preference, that gays are OWED acceptance and that we'd better, or else!

Ha really now but when people preach against homosexuals saying its unnatural, a sin, perversion, etc that not having a attitude about how they somehow feel morally superior to gay people.

No, because it's TRUE.

So then you have a double standard when it comes to who can have the attitude. As long as its the people sharing you point of view its ok to have an attitude, and to have themselves a OWED sense or morality and what is acceptable in their eyes and you better agree with them or else.

You see how this works?

If you're normal, that's all right.

Well you and how you think with your double standarded and failed logical views on the world are far from normal.

What's cool is, the "normal" decide what's normal, not you.

Whats considered normal is in the eye of the beholder, and culture i mean 100 years ago if a black person wanted to marry a white person that was looked down as not normal. Society changes its ideas of what is normal and not with the changing times and with each new generation. And most people support of gay marriage or not do look at gay people as "normal" you sir are the one who needs to rethink how you treat and talk to people because that is not normal.

No, thats why they coined the word normal. Now, you stop typing to me.

Sorry I'm shaking up your world views for that I am sorry, but I've been able to disprove your logic and your hypocrisy so if you can do better please try.

Well said!

Haha he blocked me to....I always find it so funny that people like him scream and yell against homosexuality, but once someone like me comes along who talks rationally calm and collected, and have not problem debating their views on it they run for hills and don't want to talk. It almost reminds me of children when they get introuble they try to avoid the subject or when they know what their doing is wrong they won't talk about it. That is what I honestly love most about when people act like him they out how childish their thinking is and when you contradict them with logic they block you, its almost like a child who puts their finger in their ears and says lalala I can't hear you lalala. :)

No it is not. There is nothing wrong with being gay.

In Texas, we changed our state constitution to define a marriage as being between one man and one woman. To undo that amendment, you will need my vote. To get it, you are going to have to convince me that gayness is not simply a sexual perversion akin, to say a foot fetish. Gay rights? Go do what you do, I don't want to hear about it or think about it, and I don't think you will ever get my approval.

Your state also passed an amendment to its constitution banning interracial marriage, once. Texas citizens didn't get to vote on that, just like you won't get to vote on this issue. The courts, not the voters, will decide.

Marriage and insurance have ALWAYS been state things. What you are suggesting is another federal power grab, and I don't think it will go down with a spoon full of sugar on this subject. Compare the number of states that it would take to amend the constitution of the US to the number of states that have constitutional definitions or laws defining marriage as being between one man and one woman. The deficit is certainly NOT insurmountable. The USSC my well make a ruling, but I don't think that will be the answer to all your prayers.

No, it's not a "power grab". However, voting away people's right to be married is unconstitutional, and it should be overturned.

Your demonstrated intentions to force this on states and people that don't want it suggests that the federal government will take over the marriage function. That is a power grab. If we amend the US constitution then it will be constitutional, and instead of moving to NY or Massachusetts etc, you will have to cut out to Canada.

Oh, the federal government will force people into homosexual unions? That is a power grab.

No, the power grab would be the federal government taking over a power that has ALWAYS been a state function. "by the power vested in me by the state of...." Recognized this phrase? Notice that the power comes vest by the state of...

That's ridiculous. Please tell me how that power would be usurped by the federal government if gay marriage is made legal by the supreme court. Loving v. Virginia certainly didn't change it, and neither will gay marriage. It's preposterous that you would even suggest such a thing.

I will type slowly: marriage has ALWAYS been a state thing. What you are suggesting would be yet another federal hijack of a state power.

No, it wouldn't.

And that's a crying shame. As a born and raised Texan, I know we are better than the bigotry that amendment enforces.

Nothing at all. Get over here, kitty. My feets needs some fetishins!

I think the use of the word "bigotry" is an effort of the LGBT's to equate thier plight with successful past equal right movements. However, I think the comparisons are self complimentary. Pity is the word I would have used.

Says most bigots. You lack compassion, so your opinion is meaningless.

I have different ideas about it than you do. I have no shortage of compassion for those that deserve it and since Texas passed that particular amendment, it is your opinion that is meaningless. See if the USSC will even hear the case.

You're still a bigot. I would would bet that the only people you deem worthy of compassion are the very same who don't deserve it. People just like you, xenophobe.

I am quite sure your labels help you understand the world you live in. Here is one that might help you too. Look up "Pervert."