Quantcast

How Gun Control Laws Work.

Philo-ThisSpaceForRent 2012/07/23 15:59:11
Gun Control Laws Are Intended To Control Guns. Riiiight.
Gun Control Laws Are Intended To Control Gun Owners.
You!
Add Photos & Videos

July 23, 2012 by Gary DeMar

The anti-Second Amendment crowd is on the warpath again. PBS’ Bill Moyers, who served as White House Press Secretary in the Lyndon Johnson administration from 1965 to 1967, called the NRA “the enabler of death.” It seems to me that James Holmes is the Enabler of Death. 65 million other gun owners in the United States didn’t kill anybody last Thursday evening.

I live just a few miles from the most pro-gun city in the United States – Kennesaw Georgia – where gun ownership is mandatory. It’s not the “Wild West” like some people predicted when it passed a mandatory gun ownership law. “The city of Kennesaw was selected by Family Circle magazine as one of the nation’s ‘10 best towns for families.’ The award was aimed at identifying the best communities nationally that combine big-city opportunities with suburban charm, a blend of affordable housing, good jobs, top-rated public schools, wide-open spaces, and less stress.”[1]

In 1982 the city passed the following ordinance [Sec 34-21] which was in response to a handgun ban in Morton Grove, Ill.

(a) In order to provide for the emergency management of the city, and further in order to provide for and protect the safety, security and general welfare of the city and its inhabitants, every head of household residing in the city limits is required to maintain a firearm, together with ammunition therefore.

(b) Exempt from the effect of this section are those heads of households who suffer a physical or mental disability which would prohibit them from using such a firearm. Further exempt from the effect of this section are those heads of households who are paupers or who conscientiously oppose maintaining firearms as a result of beliefs or religious doctrine, or persons convicted of a felony.

The city’s website states that Kennesaw “has the lowest crime rate in Cobb County,” one of the most populace counties in Georgia. In fact, from 1982 through 2009, Kennesaw had been nearly murder free with one murder occurring in 2007.

There were three murders in 2010 committed by the same man in what is described as a “school safety zone,” an area extending 1,000 feet from any school, including adult colleges and technical schools. This means that even though Kennesaw has the most liberal gun laws in the United States, employees at the facility where the murders were committed could not have a gun on the premises.

Of course, criminals don’t care about laws; that’s why they’re criminals. Ed Stone of Atlanta Gun Rights Examiner makes these important points:

“Unfortunately experience with actual ‘school safety zones’ in Georgia has proven that the ‘school safety zone’ law approach does not stop violent armed crime, as it disarms only the potential victims of an attack. Criminals seeking to rob, rape, and murder ignore the ‘school safety zone’ as merely one more law they are breaking.”

Now we come to New York City. In September 2011 Ryan Jerome, a former Marine Corps gunner, walked up to a security officer at the Empire State Building and asked where he could check his gun.

He had a valid concealed carry permit from his home state of Indiana. He also had the rights given to him under the Second Amendment. No matter, the security officer called police and Jerome spent the next two days in jail. “The 28-year-old with no criminal history now faces a mandatory minimum sentence of three and a half years in prison. If convicted, his sentence could be as high as fifteen years.”

He brought the gun for protection since he was traveling with $15,000 worth of jewelry that he planned to sell. Certainly a rational decision, given the crime rate in New York City and stories like the U.S. Marine veteran who was shot three times when a Craigslist transaction went bad.

In December of 2011, Tennessee nurse Meredith Graves noticed a “no guns” sign at the World Trade Center site in New York City and asked where she could leave her weapon. Like Jerome, she was arrested and faces similar charges. Mayor Bloomberg claims that she was in possession of cocaine. It seems that what the police found was BC Powder, an over-the-counter pain reliever that is sold exclusively in the South.

In a 25-year period, New York City has had more than 15,000 murders – 2245 in 1990 alone – while Kennesaw, Georgia, had 1.

Notes:
  1. Family Circle, August 2007. []


Read more: http://politicaloutcast.com/2012/07/the-most-pro-gun-low-crim...
Add a comment above

Top Opinion

  • SoCalEx-Dem 2012/07/23 17:20:30
    Gun Control Laws Are Intended To Control Gun Owners.
    SoCalEx-Dem
    +11
    Hmm! Kennesaw, Ga sounds like my kind of place. Sure would be a change from the gang infested Los Angeles area, where we are out gunned.

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Always Right 2012/07/25 01:38:52
    Gun Control Laws Are Intended To Control Gun Owners.
    Always Right
    +2
    There are enough laws on the books to prevent gun ownership by undesirables, just enforce them!
  • Philo-T... Always ... 2012/07/25 13:37:59
    Philo-ThisSpaceForRent
    +1
    Spot on.
  • CHUCK 2012/07/25 00:15:28 (edited)
    Gun Control Laws Are Intended To Control Gun Owners.
    CHUCK
    +3
    SWITZERLAND IS THE 4TH IN THE WORLD IN GUNS PER CAPITA ,EXTREMELY PERMISSIVE GUN CONTROL LAWS AND A VERY LOW CRIME RATE..


    Photobucket

    NEXT THEY WILL BAN ROCKS..

    Photobucket
  • Philo-T... CHUCK 2012/07/25 01:03:20
    Philo-ThisSpaceForRent
    +2
    Exactly.
  • Prairie Wind 2012/07/24 21:48:02
    Gun Control Laws Are Intended To Control Gun Owners.
    Prairie Wind
    +3
    We'll have to ban cars next, since some idiot will use it for an IED on your way to work in Burnsville.
  • Philo-T... Prairie... 2012/07/24 21:57:10
    Philo-ThisSpaceForRent
    Well, my kids HAVE been wanting me to exercise more....
  • Prairie... Philo-T... 2012/07/24 22:47:45
    Prairie Wind
    +1
    WOW, that's a lot of cars to ban!
  • Maddog 2012/07/24 17:27:37
    Gun Control Laws Are Intended To Control Gun Owners.
    Maddog
    +4
    This example gives the lie to the myth that "gun control" is synonymous with "crime control"! There are many other examples that can be cited.
  • Philo-T... Maddog 2012/07/24 17:33:50
    Philo-ThisSpaceForRent
    +4
    Yep - just makes it easier for the criminals...
    victims
  • Maddog Philo-T... 2012/07/24 17:58:53 (edited)
    Maddog
    +4
    One thing (among many) that the libtards fail to get through their thick skulls is that a criminal is, by definition, someone who does not obey laws; ergo, gun control laws do not apply to criminals. The end result of the lib dream of Draconian guns laws would be to leave the rest of us defenseless. (Of course rich limousine liberals, like the corpulent Rosie O'Donnell, can afford their own personal armed bodyguards to protect them from harm.)

    rosieguns
  • Philo-T... Maddog 2012/07/24 18:14:06
    Philo-ThisSpaceForRent
    +3
    Yea, I hear ya. I honestly do not understand the limp-wristed panty-waist liberals who expect everyone else to play nice, and seem honestly surprised when criminals commit crimes. And then blame the victims, or society, or Bush.
  • frank 2012/07/24 17:12:33
    Gun Control Laws Are Intended To Control Gun Owners.
    frank
    +2
    Only law bidding citizens’ will follow the law. Gun laws a useless unforced for EVERYONE
  • Philo-T... frank 2012/07/24 17:28:07
    Philo-ThisSpaceForRent
    +3
    No, they're just plain useless.
  • frank Philo-T... 2012/07/24 18:31:22
    frank
    +2
    Can't argue with that.
  • Jeff Smith 2012/07/24 12:41:44
  • Philo-T... Jeff Smith 2012/07/24 13:15:03
    Philo-ThisSpaceForRent
    +3
    I understand hyperbole when I see it, but the only way gub'mint goons are going to get my guns is ex meis frigides et mortuis manibus!
  • Jeff Smith Philo-T... 2012/07/24 14:23:04
    Jeff Smith
    +3
    My cold dead fingers
  • Philo-T... Jeff Smith 2012/07/24 14:31:04
    Philo-ThisSpaceForRent
    +2
    Usually translated to "From my cold, dead hands" yours is a bit more literal - close enough!
    gold star
  • Jeff Smith Philo-T... 2012/07/24 14:36:48
    Jeff Smith
    +1
    Latin was never one of my strong points
  • Philo-T... Jeff Smith 2012/07/24 14:46:59
    Philo-ThisSpaceForRent
    +2
    Well, mastering a dead language is not high on most normal humans' lists! What I know is mainly from biblical study, science (mostly Chemistry, but some Physics, too), and a hobby of etymology...
  • mich52 2012/07/24 05:35:34
    Gun Control Laws Are Intended To Control Guns. Riiiight.
    mich52
    Another ignorant right-wing blog.. Why?

    Gun laws don't work..
  • Philo-T... mich52 2012/07/24 08:31:49
    Philo-ThisSpaceForRent
    +2
    ROFL! A bit off-script, there - "Gun laws don't work."? Didn't you get your DNC briefing on this yet?
    obama sock puppet gif
  • Frank 2012/07/23 22:16:31
    Gun Control Laws Are Intended To Control Gun Owners.
    Frank
    +5
    I live in Missouri, they have concealed carry, and home invasion no liability if you shoot the invader. Crime has went down significantly, other than in the inner cities where the drug lords occasionally shoot each other.....
  • santa6642 2012/07/23 22:09:31 (edited)
    Gun Control Laws Are Intended To Control Gun Owners.
    santa6642
    +4
    Just like hilter, Stalin, Moe and others, An unarmed citizen is a subject,An armed citizen is a free citizen.
  • Frank santa6642 2012/07/23 22:17:33
    Frank
    +3
    Just ask a law abiding citizen in Mexico.....
  • Louisa - Enemy of the State 2012/07/23 21:49:32
    Gun Control Laws Are Intended To Control Gun Owners.
    Louisa - Enemy of the State
    +3
    If it was anybody but the communist obama, I would 'consider' reading the assault gun ban. But obama is not going to leave me unarmed so that he can turn his Brown Shirts on me! I won't be governed nor controlled by a communist while living under the US Constitution.
  • dallas Louisa ... 2012/07/23 22:35:30
  • Always ... dallas 2012/07/25 01:43:05
    Always Right
    That's why you're dying in droves!
  • dallas Always ... 2012/08/04 03:37:21
  • Always ... dallas 2012/08/04 03:48:11
    Always Right
    Dumb, Question! If you're in doubt, try me!
  • ur XLNC 2012/07/23 21:36:34
    Gun Control Laws Are Intended To Control Gun Owners.
    ur XLNC
    +5
    Facts and reality mean NOTHING to Utopian mind-sets! The 2nd Amendment was originally written to protect the citizenry from an over-reaching government. Protecting ones family and property from wild animals and criminals was TACITLY UNDERSTOOD! Fast-forward to the first gun-control law and you will notice that the 2nd Amendment was neither repealed NOR amended. The last 4 words of the 2nd Amendment make it abundantly clear that ANY effort to INFRINGE on the 2nd is UNCONSTITUTIONAL without first amending or repealing one of our CONSTITUTIONAL rights! IGNORANCE and apathy have gotten our nation into the predicament that we are currently experiencing, yet FOOLS and STUPID people want the elected parasites to make MORE insane legislation. THE CRIMINAL AND OTHER BAD PEOPLE DON'T CARE! FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS!
  • john Kills 2012/07/23 21:09:26
    Gun Control Laws Are Intended To Control Gun Owners.
    john Kills
    +3
    And I won't be controlled. I am a free man.
  • kurtanderson1 2012/07/23 21:03:16
    Gun Control Laws Are Intended To Control Gun Owners.
    kurtanderson1
    +3
    It's a societal problem, not a gun problem.
  • Racefish 2012/07/23 20:45:27
    Gun Control Laws Are Intended To Control Gun Owners.
    Racefish
    +3
    The only people who would turn in their guns would be law abiding.
  • Maddog Racefish 2012/07/23 20:51:12
    Maddog
    +5
    I consider myself law abiding, but would refuse to turn in any of my personal property to a government entity. I'd bury them first.
  • Racefish Maddog 2012/07/24 17:10:46
    Racefish
    +2
    You wouldn't be "law abiding" then would you? You'd be branded a "criminal by the very people who would enslave you. The 2nd Amendment is there for a reason.
  • Maddog Racefish 2012/07/24 17:23:46
    Maddog
    +3
    Mea Culpa!
  • Racefish Maddog 2012/07/24 17:32:54
    Racefish
    +2
    Can we get adjoining cells?
  • Maddog Racefish 2012/07/24 17:33:48
    Maddog
    +1
    Sounds good to me.
  • Philo-T... Racefish 2012/07/23 20:51:42
    Philo-ThisSpaceForRent
    +7
    Well, the hardened criminals wouldn't, that's for sure, but I wouldn't be so sure that otherwise law-abiding citizens would, either.

    molon labe

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2013/05/21 18:51:17

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals