Quantcast

How can we keep American jobs and companies from going overseas??!!

BlueRepublican 2012/06/22 21:20:52
TAX Companies that ship jobs overseas!!!
Lower Taxes and bring the jobs back!!!
End the Criminal trade agreements!!
More Taxpayer subsidies for US Companies!!
Global market forces at work here!!
Throw more $$$ at Education & Technology
None of the above
You!
Add Photos & Videos

Is it by taxing companies that ship jobs overseas? Is it by lowering taxes and attracting investments and capital back here? Do we need to re-negotiate trade agreements to be more competitive? Is it more investment in Education and Technology? More taxpayer subsidies for certain industries? Could it simply be global market forces at work forcing our evolution? Do you have another solution not listed? Then join the discussion and vote now, leave a comment, share with all your friends, and RAVE!!!!

unemployment up
Add a comment above

Top Opinion

  • Cal 2012/06/22 21:37:26 (edited)
    Lower Taxes and bring the jobs back!!!
    Cal
    +9
    Lower taxes, make it easier for businesses, etc. Make America a business friendly nation again and companies will have no reason to run away.

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • lee Doc 2012/08/05 19:07:29
    lee
    +1
    we definitely can, and should have both...

    but the government side should be FOREVER separate from the private charity side.

    i'm already not conformable with how churches can get tax exempt status yet still try to influence how their congregation chooses to vote. that should NOT be happening.

    and if as an individual, you want to donate time/money/goods to a private charity for the benefit of your community, that is perfectly fine.

    however, i don't appreciate communities who have the means to do all that looking down on their neighbor community who may not have the means to do that and who may need more assistance from the government sources that we should ALL be contributing to.
  • Doc lee 2012/08/07 23:24:30
    Doc
    I think we should have a choice.
  • lee Doc 2012/08/07 23:48:37
    lee
    you do... you can choose to give to private charity if you want to.

    but that giving does not free you from your obligation to the government side (i.e. taxes).
  • Doc lee 2012/08/08 01:27:32
    Doc
    Sure, thing, nut the purpose of government is not to take care of people, it is to induce the kind of environment where folks can take care of themselves.
  • lee Doc 2012/08/08 01:31:19
    lee
    we were not talking about that... we were talking about the ppl who cant' take care of themselves for the moment.
  • Doc lee 2012/08/08 14:12:21
    Doc
    Yes, but that still is not the purpose of government.

    No where in the constitution does it grant the authority to take what person, "A" has created and earned, and give it to person, "B", who has neither created nor earned it.
  • lee Doc 2012/08/08 16:57:02
    lee
    of couse not, why should it... nor does it say anything about the internet...

    what's your point?

    because they didn't spell it out in exact detail we don't need to do it?

    that's childish.
  • Doc lee 2012/08/11 17:36:43
    Doc
    My point is that you thinking it's okay to take money from one person to give it to another is unconstitutional, and even though it is based on compassion, wrong.
  • lee Doc 2012/08/12 05:28:31
    lee
    that is the whole point of government in a society, to take care of the less fortunate by using the strength of the successful.

    otherwise it every man for himself and we have nothing of value here at all.
  • Doc lee 2012/08/12 17:35:48
    Doc
    And that's where we disagree. I think that government is there to due what's in the constitution, and that's pretty much it.

    When you take what one person earns and give to another who didn't earned it, you take away the reason to wrok from both.

    History, human nature, and evidence supports this.
  • lee Doc 2012/08/13 16:53:21
    lee
    +1
    I never said it should be just GIVEN to them, did I?

    there will always be strings attached to any $$$ from the government (unlike your pet private charities).

    are you buying into the lie that Romney has put out there about Obama doing away with work-for-welfare rules?
  • Doc lee 2012/08/14 19:28:45
    Doc
    Then one can serve the master that is government to get what someone else had earned, or they can serve no master and take care of themselves.

    I don't know enough about Obama's welfare plans to pass judgement about that particular point, so until I find contrary evidence, I will take your side. (you are pretty honest)

    But I do know that Obama wants to share properity and wealth.
  • lee Doc 2012/08/14 21:40:12
    lee
    of course he wants to share prosperity, it should be shared... that's what makes us great.
  • Doc lee 2012/08/14 23:37:16
    Doc
    no sir, what makes us great is the shared opportunity to be prosperous. One doesn't have to do anything the share properity except take what one has and give it to another.
  • lee Doc 2012/08/15 00:07:29
    lee
    +1
    ok, we'll use your words "shared opprotuntiy"

    how is the opprotuntiy "shared" when some have access to it and others do not.

    do you have any interested in rectifying that, or are you HAPPY that some ppl are held back while others get a leg up?

    be honest.
  • Doc lee 2012/08/17 00:36:43
    Doc
    I am very dis satisfied that some are held back while others get a leg up.

    But I feel that it's the left that's doing this.
  • lee Doc 2012/08/17 00:43:26
    lee
    that's funny because most of us on the left feel that to combat the lack of opportunity that some groups experience, we have to give them a leg up.

    its not a zero sum game...

    just because some guy qualifies for a scholarship and you don't does not mean anyone is holding you back while giving him a leg up.

    you have the same opportunity you have always had and now he has a shot at equal footing with you.

    this situation bothers you?

    i don't get it.
  • Doc lee 2012/08/26 18:30:03
    Doc
    I don't care about anyone else having a scholarship, as long as I am not forced to pay for it. That is what bothers me. I don't like giving my money to people who hate me for it.

    You don't increase opportunity for some by taking it away from others. That disincentivizes both, and results in a degrading of society.
  • lee Doc 2012/08/27 20:21:57
    lee
    you can't make ppl like you by giving them things.. that's now how it works...

    have a kid, you'll see what I mean.
  • Doc lee 2012/09/01 17:35:46
    Doc
    I have grand kids. And I don't do it to get folks to like me.

    And is giving people free stuff working for Obama?
  • lee Doc 2012/09/01 19:08:28
    lee
    then why do you need them to know who its coming from?

    what free stuff?
  • Doc lee 2012/08/14 23:38:04
    Doc
    On a side note, what should one do to "earn" his keep if one is less fortunate?
  • lee Doc 2012/08/15 00:07:56 (edited)
    lee
    less than the fortunate ones.
  • Doc lee 2012/08/17 00:38:14
    Doc
    And there it is, one deserves money from another by simply existing.

    I don't think that's a good reason to take money from one person to give to another.
  • lee Doc 2012/08/17 00:47:50
    lee
    then you have never been oppressed. good for you.

    but there are ppl out there who discriminate and as a result there are groups who have been oppressed.

    to ignore that takes something away from your soul.
  • Doc lee 2012/08/26 18:32:41
    Doc
    I have been discriminated against plenty. In fact there are pleny of folks on the left that say my ancestors had it worse than anybody. But there is no one today that is going through that in this country.

    But what is more souless, to not want others to give away my money to the poor, although I do it myself, or those who wish to take my money and let others decide who gets it, because to acutally dirty your hands by dealing with the less fortunate, you are less civilized?
  • lee Doc 2012/08/27 20:24:53
    lee
    +1
    your personal gifts of charity are yours and yours alone to make and to get as much personal satisfaction from as you can manage...

    but i would say this... the truest act of charity is an anonymous act of charity.

    so if you are only in the "giving" mode because you get something back from it... then you are doing it for the wrong reasons.
  • Doc lee 2012/09/01 17:37:00
    Doc
    I don't think there is such a thing as true altruism. I give a lot anonymously, but I do it so I can feel better about myself.

    but I would say that the right gives way more than the left.
  • lee Doc 2012/09/01 19:09:37
    lee
    that IS what they say on the right... it make them feel better i guess.
  • Doc lee 2012/08/05 18:02:31
    Doc
    on a side note, I had to stick up for you on another post.

    You may be on the wrong side "my opinion,, lol", but you are honest and speak from the heart, and I respect that.
  • Doc lee 2012/06/29 18:24:05
    Doc
    On a side ntoe, I like everything you say except the last line.

    And as far as that last line, the socialist policies of our current administration will get us there quicker.

    Most folks who believe in social justice always blame capitalism for the failures of socialism to keep the promises of socialism
  • lee Doc 2012/07/05 18:16:41
    lee
    +1
    socialism, to the extent that we practice it in the US, would tend to close the widening income inequality gap...

    capitalism is the tool that widens that gap... always has,... always will.

    the only thing preventing a runaway condition (and collapse) is government regulation and laws. Rules and laws put into effect by the PEOPLE.

    when corporate interests are the ones forming the laws and rules, then we have a runaway form of capitalism that inevitably leads to what happened to us in 1929 and what happened again in 2008.

    then answer is to take back our government from these interests and to put in place the rules and laws that work for the PEOPLE rather than the corporations... just like we did then.
  • Doc lee 2012/07/11 18:12:56
    Doc
    YOu make a lot of sense. Although I disagree with some of you premises, I like knowing that you heart is good.

    But back to the subject, may I ask you this.

    If you could get more money doing the exact same job, would you do it?
  • lee Doc 2012/07/11 18:25:34
    lee
    +1
    of course I would... but that is a double edge sword.

    you eventually price yourself out of the competition and a job.

    and this is coming from a middle income perspective where ANY extra income is going toward savings for retirement and maybe a vacation.


    when we talk about income over $250k/yr we are WELL beyond taking care of basic needs... we are in the realm of more money than you know what to do with unless you are starting your own business or something.

    for ppl in that situation, its hard for me to feel like its a burden at all to ask for an additional 3% from them.
  • Doc lee 2012/07/13 18:49:03
    Doc
    If you would take more money for the same job, then at least you can understand how others might want to do the same. That's why businesses move to other countries, to get more money. For themselves and their shareholders, if they have any.

    As for folks making 250k+, if you don't make that much, then how can you judge what's best for them?
    Do you like being told how to live your life and spend your money?

    Don't get me wrong, I am not saying people shouldn't help others or anything like that, what I'm saying is that forcing people to do the best thing is actually the wrong thing to do.
  • lee Doc 2012/07/13 18:51:44
    lee
    +1
    forcing ppl to pay 3% more in taxes is hardly telling them what to do.

    they will get over it, trust me.
  • Doc lee 2012/07/13 21:04:16
    Doc
    They might get over it, but truly, telling people to pay 3% more is telling them what to do.

    You've nailed me on being inaccurate before, should you expect less from yourself? I don't, becuase I am beginning to understand what a fine mind you have.

    I don't think we need more taxes, I think we need more taxpayers.
  • lee Doc 2012/07/13 21:30:54
    lee
    more tax payers will only come about if we put money in the pockets of middle class ppl so they can create DEMAND for things made by ppl who get paid to make them (and put some of that toward taxes).
  • Doc lee 2012/07/17 23:55:33
    Doc
    I don't think that would work, since you have to get the money from other people. Your reasoning is sound, but I think part of the problem with our financial condition is the idea that money should be taken away from someone and given to someone else without them earning it.

    I base this on observation of life.

    Animals who are given food daily forget how to hunt, and lose their physical abilities., and people in general only work as hard as they have to.
  • lee Doc 2012/07/18 00:00:39
    lee
    +1
    its the same pricipal as how you get to have a roof over your head even tho the BANK technicaly owns your house.

    its still cozy no matter how you slice it.

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2013/05/24 15:20:25

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals