Quantcast

House Republican proposes ‘unprecedented’ cuts to women’s health

Samantha 2012/07/18 21:01:04
This is the latest episode in the ongoing conservative war against women.

Rep. Denny Rehberg (R-MT), chairman of the House Labor, Health and Human Service and Education Committee, has proposed a far-reaching anti-choice bill that boasts $6.2 billion in spending cuts, many of which are achieved through attacks on services for women’s reproductive health.

Rehberg’s bill (PDF), which has yet to undergo a committee vote, proposes cuts to various women’s health services, including cutting funding for Planned Parenthood. It also allows employers to opt out of insuring women employees’ contraception coverage for ‘moral reasons’ and authorizes spending on abstinence-only education, which is widely deemed ineffective at reducing teen pregnancy, STIs or the onset of sexual activity.

Planned Parenthood issued a statement objecting to the cuts, calling the bill an “unprecedented suite of attacks on women’s health.”

“This budget proposal is badly out of touch with the needs of American women and families. Chairman Denny Rehberg and the House Republican leadership clearly don’t think that their constituents care about their access to health care. They could not be more wrong,” said Cecile Richards, president of Planned Parenthood Federation of America. “Eliminating vital preventive programs like the national family planning program and attacking women’s health providers will mean that millions of women would lose access to basic, preventive health services, and those are economic issues for millions of families.”


Read More: http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/07/18/house-republ...

You!
Add Photos & Videos

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • historian 2012/07/18 21:32:30
    historian
    Why can't abortionists simply be honest and say pro-abortion, not choice. It's not a woman's body in question, as the gestating child in the womb is a separate human being, regardless of what stage of development. A new life, unique DNA, not a spare set of body parts hooked up by a tube until it magically becomes human when it is expelled from a woman's vagina or surgically removed from the womb. I know it makes it easy to call the new life a piece of meat when wanting to destroy it, but be realistic, it's ending a new life developing in the woman's womb.
  • Samantha historian 2012/07/18 21:33:44
    Samantha
    Abortion is a choice! Yes, it is the woman's body; a fetus isn't, by legal definition, a human being.
  • historian Samantha 2012/07/18 21:41:22
    historian
    I couldn't care less about the legalese that turns a human being into a nothing, piece of meat. Abortion is murder, the ending of a defenseless life growing within a woman's womb. It's not a part of her body, it's a separate life getting nourishment or "life support" from the woman. Be honest.
  • Samantha historian 2012/07/18 22:10:35
    Samantha
    A fetus isn't legally a human being; therefore, your argument fails. Legally, abortion isn't murder and abortion occurs in the Christian Bible. In fact, the God Christians worship aborted the child of David and Bathsheba.
  • historian Samantha 2012/07/18 22:23:31
    historian
    I'll post it again and hopefully this time it'll sink in. I couldn't care less about the legalese excuse for murdering a unique life developing in the womb of a woman. As for abortion in the "Christian Bible", Christianity is based on the teachings of Jesus and the Apostles and they never promoted killing unborn children. As for God striking someone dead, it is laughable that you would claim that a woman has an equal authority with the Almighty in deciding who lives and who dies.
  • Samantha historian 2012/07/18 22:26:56
    Samantha
    To the contrary, part of the Christian tradition is the Old Testament and in it God kills the unborn child of David and Bathsheba. In the United States, a woman has a right to an abortion, in fact she has a constitutional right. A fetus, legally, isn't a human being.
  • Roger47 2012/07/18 21:29:27
    Roger47
    +1
    War on women? Absolutely.

News & Politics

2013/05/24 03:59:46

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals