Quantcast

House passes bill eliminating Senate confirmation for presidential appointees?

~ The Rebel ~ 2012/08/01 13:50:14

UPDATE: The House passed the legislation Tuesday night by a vote of 261-116. The bill now goes to President Obama’s desk for his signature.

The House of Representatives is set to consider legislation Tuesday that would exempt certain presidential appointees from having to be confirmed by the Senate.

But a number of conservative groups are arguing that the “Presidential Efficiency and Streamlining Act” amounts to Congress neutering itself and giving the executive branch unprecedented power.

Presidential appointees that would no longer require Senate confirmation under the legislation include the treasurer of the United States and the deputy administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration.

“The United States Constitution does not bestow kingly powers on the President to appoint the senior officers of the government with no process,” wrote Thomas McClusky, the senior vice president for the Family Research Council’s legislative arm, in a Monday memo to lawmakers.

Sources told The Daily Caller that there is concern in the ranks among conservatives opposed to the legislation that House leaders will bring the legislation up for a voice vote to avoid putting members on the record.

Read More: http://dailycaller.com/2012/07/31/house-to-conside...

You!
Add Photos & Videos

Top Opinion

  • safari 2012/08/01 14:26:51
    safari
    +21
    The SOB is already acting as a dictator - I wish I had known this was in the works.

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Xed0 2012/08/02 00:09:22
    Xed0
    +1
    Next come the term limits....
  • Crypt_H... Xed0 2012/08/02 01:52:51
    Crypt_Heart
    O.o I actually think they could do with being a year longer >.> with congress approval of course =P
  • LesWaggoner BN 1 2012/08/01 23:56:46
    LesWaggoner BN 1
    +3
    I don't trust anyone in congress to be able to find their behind with both hands. Why should they decide who should and who should not assist a president in running the nation.
    What congress has done for us so far is NOTHING. No jobs legislation much less anything else to reset our economy.
    Anyone who thinks there is any intelligence in our congress is asa stupid as those who represent us.
  • Common Sense Conservative 2012/08/01 23:49:05
    Common Sense Conservative
    +5
    None of this should be happening people. NONE!!

    This SOB in office needs to be removed and these laws that are passing through aren't even being looked at by everyone. They pass because someone tells them to vote yea or nay and this is how our system is working. Before we know it Hussein Obama will be the dictator here and all hell will break loose. Can you say civil war.
  • warkitten Common ... 2012/08/02 01:35:48 (edited)
    warkitten
    +2
    Calm guys..easy does it..its frustrating to say the least bit civil war will not happen..Americans can do this..we are not separated...stand for the constitution..it protects us all..rich poor..black white..woman, man ....we got this...don't cry division yet...it is not what it seems
  • Common ... warkitten 2012/08/02 22:20:06
    Common Sense Conservative
    +1
    Oh it is, I've never seen people talk so much about what's going on right now than ever before. People not only don't like what Hussein Obama is doing, they HATE what he's doing and what he's about. After 9/11 people came together like none other and we were on our way to great things again until Pelosi and Frank started the financial downfall. Now bring in Hussein Obama and his social agenda, what else do I have to say?
  • warkitten Common ... 2012/08/03 15:07:38
    warkitten
    +2
    A lot of craziness has happened and its not going away soon...no civil war..if anyone is going to fight on our homeland its going to be Americans driving back the illegals invading the country..forcing our government to give back jobs to its rightful citizens and free up Americans hard earned money to use it as it should be...not on moochers
  • Common ... warkitten 2012/08/03 17:24:47
    Common Sense Conservative
    +1
    I hope you're right.
  • jubil8 ... Common ... 2012/08/02 01:49:36
    jubil8 BN-0 PON
    +3
    It was a REPUBLICAN House that passed this.

    Someone's got some 'splainin' to do!
  • Common ... jubil8 ... 2012/08/02 22:20:35
    Common Sense Conservative
    +2
    I could care less WHO passed anything, it's wrong.
  • jubil8 ... Common ... 2012/08/03 01:24:36
    jubil8 BN-0 PON
    +2
    No disagreement.
  • Rusty Shackleford 2012/08/01 23:23:30
    Rusty Shackleford
    +8
    But a number of conservative groups are arguing that the “Presidential Efficiency and Streamlining Act” amounts to Congress neutering itself and giving the executive branch unprecedented power.
    I agree.
  • jere.chievres 2012/08/01 23:19:24
    jere.chievres
    +6
    It will have to pass the Senate first and believe me it wont!
  • Rusty S... jere.ch... 2012/08/01 23:24:19
    Rusty Shackleford
    +3
    Are you kidding, they will do anything to increase the overall power of the federal government.
  • Common ... jere.ch... 2012/08/01 23:49:43
    Common Sense Conservative
    +3
    It shouldn't even be written
  • Marek jere.ch... 2012/08/02 01:49:22
    Marek
    +3
    I sincerely hope that you are right on that.
  • jere.chievres 2012/08/01 23:09:36
  • ed jere.ch... 2012/08/01 23:16:20
    ed
    +4
    somebody better get off their ass and rule on it that's for sure.
  • George ... jere.ch... 2012/08/01 23:48:16
    George Romney
    +1
    The Supreme Court can't over rule. Article 2, Section 2 of the Constitution as written by James Madison empowers Congress to vest power over appointments to the President alone, if they wish.
  • Mr. T 2012/08/01 22:57:45
    Mr. T
    +3
    They just handed over our freedom.
  • Crypt_H... Mr. T 2012/08/02 01:55:03
    Crypt_Heart
    Not quite.
  • banzaibuckaroo 2012/08/01 22:54:42 (edited)
    banzaibuckaroo
    +5
    OMG, the House totally disregarded the Constitution on this one. Streamline or not, this is the law of our land, and any bill or appointment must be voted on both cambers of Congress. I'm getting way to sick of this congress, and they should stop voting what to rename post office, and get back to work.
  • Crypt_H... banzaib... 2012/08/02 01:55:29
    Crypt_Heart
    +1
    Longstride stated: "Article 2, Section 2 of the Constitution as written by James Madison empowers Congress to vest power over appointments to the President alone, if they wish."
  • kevracer 2012/08/01 22:26:52
    kevracer
    Presidential Appointment Efficiency and Streamlining Act of 2011
    Lots of GOP members voted for it
    Cutting the scope of Government saves money


    Eliminates the requirement of Senate approval (advice and consent) of specified presidentially-appointed positions in federal agencies and departments, as follows: -Department of Agriculture:
    (1) Assistant Secretary for Administration,
    (2) Administrator of the Rural Utilities Services, and
    (3) all members of the Board of Directors of the Commodity Credit Corporation; -Department of Commerce: Chief Scientist, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA); -Department of Defense (DOD):
    (1) all members of the National Security Education Board, and
    (2) Director of the Selective Service System; -Department of Education:
    (1) Assistant Secretary for Management, and
    (2) Commissioner for Education Statistics; -Department of Health and Human Services (HHS): Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs; -Department of Homeland Security (DHS):
    (1) Director of the Office for Domestic Preparedness,
    (2) Assistant Administrator for Grant Programs, Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA),
    (3) Administrator of the U.S. Fire Administration,
    (4) Director of the Office of Counternarcotics Enforcement,
    (5) Chief Medical Officer, and
    (6) As...
























    Presidential Appointment Efficiency and Streamlining Act of 2011
    Lots of GOP members voted for it
    Cutting the scope of Government saves money


    Eliminates the requirement of Senate approval (advice and consent) of specified presidentially-appointed positions in federal agencies and departments, as follows: -Department of Agriculture:
    (1) Assistant Secretary for Administration,
    (2) Administrator of the Rural Utilities Services, and
    (3) all members of the Board of Directors of the Commodity Credit Corporation; -Department of Commerce: Chief Scientist, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA); -Department of Defense (DOD):
    (1) all members of the National Security Education Board, and
    (2) Director of the Selective Service System; -Department of Education:
    (1) Assistant Secretary for Management, and
    (2) Commissioner for Education Statistics; -Department of Health and Human Services (HHS): Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs; -Department of Homeland Security (DHS):
    (1) Director of the Office for Domestic Preparedness,
    (2) Assistant Administrator for Grant Programs, Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA),
    (3) Administrator of the U.S. Fire Administration,
    (4) Director of the Office of Counternarcotics Enforcement,
    (5) Chief Medical Officer, and
    (6) Assistant Secretaries for Health Affairs, Legislative Affairs, and Public Affairs; -Housing and Urban Development (HUD): Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs; -Department of Justice (DOJ):
    (1) Directors of the Bureaus of Justice Statistics and Justice Assistance,
    (2) Director of the National Institute of Justice,
    (3) Administrator of the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, and
    (4) Director of the Office for Victims of Crime; -Department of Labor:
    (1) Assistant Secretaries for Administration and Management and for Public Affairs, and
    (2) Director of the Women's Bureau; -Department of State: Assistant Secretaries for Public Affairs and for Administration; -Department of Transportation (DOT):
    (1) Assistant Secretaries for Budget and Programs and for Administration,
    (2) Deputy Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), and
    (3) Administrator of the St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation; -Department of the Treasury:
    (1) Assistant Secretaries for Public Affairs and for Management, and
    (2) Treasurer of the United States; -Department of Veterans Affairs (VA): Assistant Secretaries for Management, for Human Resources and Administration, for Public and Intergovernmental Affairs, and for Operations, Security, and Preparedness; -Appalachian Regional Commission: Alternative Federal Co-Chairman; -Council of Economic Advisers: all members, except the Chairperson; -Corporation for National and Community Service: Managing Director; -National Council on Disability: all members, including the Chairperson; -National Museum and Library Services Boards: all members; -National Science Foundation (NSF): all Board members; -Office of National Drug Control Policy: Deputy Directors; -Office of Navajo and Hopi Relocation: Commissioner; -United States Agency for International Development (USAID): Assistant Administrator for Management; -Community Development Financial Institution Fund: Administrator; -Mississippi River Commission: all Commissioners; -National Board for Education Sciences: all members; -National Institute for Literacy Advisory Board: all members; and -Board of Trustees of the Institute of American Indian and Alaska Native Culture and Arts Development: all members.
    Eliminates the positions of Assistant Secretary of Defense for Networks and Information and for Public Affairs. Eliminates the requirement of Senate approval of all appointments to and promotions for the Commissioned Officer Corps in the Public Health Service and in NOAA. Provides that removal of the requirement of Senate confirmation of any position in this Act shall not result in any such position being placed in the Senior Executive Service or alter compensation for such position.
    Sec. 3) Expands the requirements for the appointment of a Director of the Census, including that such appointment be made without regard to political affiliation and that the appointee have a demonstrated ability in managing large organizations and experience in the collection, analysis, and use of statistical data.
    Limits the Director's term to five years, beginning on December 1, 2012, and prohibits a Director from serving more than two full terms.
    Authorizes the President to remove the Director from office after communicating in writing the reasons for removal to Congress not later than 60 days before the removal.
    Section 4 -
    Establishes the Working Group on Streamlining Paperwork for Executive Nominations (Working Group) to study and report to the President and specified congressional committees on the streamlining of paperwork required for executive nominations and review the impact of background investigations requirements on the appointments process.
    Requires that the report of the Working Group include:
    (1) recommendations for the streamlining of paperwork required for executive nominations, and
    (2) a detailed plan for the creation and implementation of an electronic system for collecting and distributing background information from nominees for positions which require Senate approval.
    Requires such electronic system to provide for less of a burden on potential nominees for positions which require Senate approval, faster delivery of background information, fewer errors of omission, and a single, searchable form (Smart Form) that will be free to a nominee, will be easy to use, and will streamline the process of vetting a nominee and tracking information provided by a nominee.
    Section 5 -
    Requires the Government Accountability Office (GAO) to study and report to Congress and the President on presidentially-appointed positions that do not require Senate approval.
    Section 6 -
    Makes the provisions of this Act relating to Senate approval of presidential appointments effective 60 days after enactment and makes the other provisions effective upon enactment.
    (more)
  • Jack Sprat 2012/08/01 22:20:36
    Jack Sprat
    +2
    I could see this if San fran nan had her claws into the scream, but have the RepubliCan'ts finally gone over the edge and fallen on everyone else's sword once too often?

    There was a thought out by someone like Buchanan which said, "have the republican'ts become irrelevant"? Maybe.
  • sbtbill 2012/08/01 22:16:40
    sbtbill
    +3
    Personally, I'd like to see the Cabinet office made into elective positions.
  • Common ... sbtbill 2012/08/01 23:51:34
    Common Sense Conservative
    +1
    You'd like to see Hussein Obama make this country into a dictatorship
  • Crypt_H... Common ... 2012/08/02 02:26:57
    Crypt_Heart
    Who passed the bill?
  • Common ... Crypt_H... 2012/08/02 22:22:30
    Common Sense Conservative
    +1
    Is this a trick question?

    If not, Congress.
  • Crypt_H... Common ... 2012/08/02 22:50:22
    Crypt_Heart
    =P exactly. Not Obama.
  • Common ... Crypt_H... 2012/08/03 17:25:37
    Common Sense Conservative
    +1
    Where's it go next?
  • Crypt_H... Common ... 2012/08/03 17:39:59 (edited)
    Crypt_Heart
    Oh so Obama is 'supposed' to correct the screw ups on Congress? I'm pretty sure he's supposed to just rubber stamp it.
  • Common ... Crypt_H... 2012/08/06 01:53:19
    Common Sense Conservative
    +1
    He's supposed t not sign it.
  • Crypt_H... Common ... 2012/08/06 02:02:33
    Crypt_Heart
    So you would be happy if President Obama refused to sign something that had wide spread approval across both parties in Congress and the Senate?
  • Common ... Crypt_H... 2012/08/06 06:42:49
    Common Sense Conservative
    +1
    It's not good policy.
  • Crypt_H... Common ... 2012/08/06 15:01:40
    Crypt_Heart
    That he may be, but there would be an uproar and he would definitely lose his presidency if he went against the will of the houses.
  • Common ... Crypt_H... 2012/08/06 16:17:52
    Common Sense Conservative
    +1
    He's going to lose his presidency regardless. He really sucks.
  • Crypt_H... Common ... 2012/08/06 16:20:53
    Crypt_Heart
    We'll see =3
  • Common ... Crypt_H... 2012/08/06 17:45:02
    Common Sense Conservative
    +1
    Yes we will
  • Zoomie 2012/08/01 22:07:22
    Zoomie
    +1
    Read the Washington Post article on this, and there is some logic to it...

    In 1960, JFK had 286 positions to fill requiring Senate approval.
    In 2001, Dubya had 914 positions to fill...
    In 2008, Obama had 1,215 positions to fill..

    This law does not do away with Senate approval entirely. Instead, it simply eliminates the need for hundreds of positions that have been added over the last 50 years. Apparently the Senate has already voted to remove 270 positions requiring confirmation; the House bill only removes 169.

News & Politics

2013/05/22 21:52:31

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals