Quantcast

Homeland Security Declares Christians are Terrorists!!!!

Washington April 7th 2009 – A newly unclassified Department of Homeland Security report warns that A) Christians, B) Returning US Soldiers, C) Political supporters of candidates such as Ron Paul, and D) Supporters of States Rights, ....Are Terrorist Suspects, who have to be closely watched, and assessed as to the Level of threat they may pose to the Federal Government of the United States Of America!

( Or of the Former United States Of America, which I feel is more accurate an assessment and title! )

The report, titled "Right-wing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment," is the very same report from DHS' Office of Intelligence and Analysis defines right-wing extremism in the U.S. as "divided into those groups, movements and adherents that are primarily hate-oriented (based on hatred of particular religious, racial or ethnic groups)

I )And as such, if Christians are determined to be “Hateful” towards Extremists, ( who use Terrorism, against Foreign and Domestic individuals, according to their spheres of influence ) ....Because we don’t like them “Blowing Everyone Up In Sight,” or “Torturing Women and Children,” ....Then we can be determined to be “Domestic Terrorists,” and placed under surveillance, or worse, by our own Federal Government, and it’s various agencies, etc.., etc.., etc..,!!!!

II) And those that are mainly anti-government, for rejecting “Alleged” Federal Authority in favor of state or local authority, or rejecting government authority entirely.


The report states the DHS will be working with state and local partners over the next several months to determine the levels of right-wing extremist activity in the U.S.

The report warned law enforcement agencies to watch for suspicious individuals who may have bumper stickers for third-party political candidates such as Ron Paul


1) It further warned law enforcement to watch out for individuals with "radical" ideologies based on Christian views, such as opposing ( illegal immigration )

2) It further warned law enforcement to watch out for individuals with "radical" ideologies based on Christian views, such as opposing (abortion )

3) It further warned law enforcement to watch out for individuals with "radical" ideologies based on Christian views, such as opposing (federal taxes )


So now I guess that Christians, who speak out against Taxes, Abortion, and Illegal Immigration, or for, States Rights, and alternative Candidates, to those currently in power, such as Ron Paul, .....Are classified as “Potential Terrorist Suspects!!!!”


World Net Daily



Mike
You!
Add Photos & Videos

Top Opinion

  • Southern Man 2009/04/14 23:33:03 (edited)
    Southern Man
    +14
    This Has to be a Joke Right ? .................. What About The Drug Cartels out of mexico ?? What About the Gang Bangers That Live in Every City in This Country ................................ lil'barry is a AssHat ....... Home Land Security is a Joke ............ i Could go on and on But i Wont ........... you get the Drift

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Pacific NW 2009/04/15 16:11:35
    Pacific NW
    +3
    I like Ron Paul! And I will continue to supporting him. The left wing may barking like a dogs about him all they want! I will curse them all will fail!!!!
    What they are going to do to me? Send me in jail??? Ha! I am a citizen who love her homeland not like somebody try be a citizen of the world!!! ha....ha....
    Everyones should stand in the Tea parties all day and night tell the obama adminitration - "Resign". You Citizens put him there and You! people can take him out!!! Listen to 166 Radio Americans Right!!! Flight! For Your Right...!!!
    WAke UP!!! WE must flight...For OURS Right!!!!!
    United States Of AMerica NO! Need to "Rebuild!" WE are the Founding - Father! From G. Washington! Not the O!!!
  • RicemanSTM ~POTL~PWCM~JLA~AFCL 2009/04/15 15:04:54
    RicemanSTM ~POTL~PWCM~JLA~AFCL
    +7
    Anyone who's not with the big O is against the big O and doesn't want to have a big O. You're all ENEMIES OF THE STATE.
  • Pacific NW Riceman... 2009/04/15 16:15:26
    Pacific NW
    +4
    Anyone who's againt the big O meaning they loves they Country!!! They honesty people pay taxes on time. And protecting their homeland. And those people they love real Americans!!!! For who's against big O is good for all...They love Capitalism!
  • Riceman... Pacific NW 2009/04/15 16:19:10 (edited)
    RicemanSTM ~POTL~PWCM~JLA~AFCL
    +4
    I hope you understand I was being sarcastic. Obama makes me vomit..you know...in the back...of my throat... :-)
  • Kennedy1st 2009/04/15 14:51:41
    Kennedy1st
    +1
    My son is a Federal Agent with I.C.E (Homeland Security) an that is not true.They are doing a good job and put up with middle school I.Q and put their lives on the line. am proud of my son.
    Kennedy security true job middle school lives line proud son kennedy security true job middle school lives line proud son kennedy security true job middle school lives line proud son kennedy security true job middle school lives line proud son kennedy
  • Riceman... Kennedy1st 2009/04/15 15:05:56
    RicemanSTM ~POTL~PWCM~JLA~AFCL
    +3
    Thank you to you and your son for his service. But, the memo is out there.

    http://www.thelibertypapers.o...
  • Sherloc... Kennedy1st 2009/04/15 21:53:49
  • a 2009/04/15 14:10:52
    a
    +2
    Well I'm not a terrorist. So the liberals need to get over it. Well we told you so people of America. Socialism/Communism is in play.
  • let's vote already 2009/04/15 14:10:48
    let's vote already
    Finally...WND, the sensationalist internet rag gets a new reason to post lies.

    I've read through this assesment several times and have found no labeling of groups of people as terrorist suspects.

    Here, you read through it and see how many lies WND has placed in print. http://www.fas.org/irp/eprint...

    Ron Paul's name never appears in this document.
    There is no mention of bumper stickers.
    It doesn't tell LEOs what to look out for.

    Rather, it focuses on the current conditions and the recruiting efforts of right wing EXTREMIST groups. Abortion foes, illegal immigration foes and Christians are not EXTREMISTS.
  • Riceman... let's v... 2009/04/15 15:06:26
  • let's v... Riceman... 2009/04/15 15:14:13
    let's vote already
    +1
    what does a document published in September of 2007 have to do with this poll?
  • Riceman... let's v... 2009/04/15 15:17:24 (edited)
    RicemanSTM ~POTL~PWCM~JLA~AFCL
    +1
    Uhmmm..because this is the document that's being referenced? Duh?
  • let's v... Riceman... 2009/04/15 15:25:49
    let's vote already
    +1
    Wrong. The referenced document is Dated April 7, 2009. Duh.
  • Riceman... let's v... 2009/04/15 15:28:21
    RicemanSTM ~POTL~PWCM~JLA~AFCL
    +1
    It appears we are referencing the same document. They're identical sir.
  • let's v... Riceman... 2009/04/15 15:30:25
    let's vote already
    +1
    Aha...they use a European date form...09-04-07.

    Now that we've established that, I'm holding the document in my hand and have read it several times. Your point is....
  • Riceman... let's v... 2009/04/15 15:32:04 (edited)
    RicemanSTM ~POTL~PWCM~JLA~AFCL
    +1
    It uses 8 people to whitewash a entire political viewpoint as an extremist security threat. Don't you find that a little disturbing?
  • let's v... Riceman... 2009/04/15 15:36:36
    let's vote already
    +1
    The people it references either specifically or generally and the groups they may or may not belong to are used as past examples of such occurences, not an entire political view. You use it as such.
  • Riceman... let's v... 2009/04/15 15:49:58
    RicemanSTM ~POTL~PWCM~JLA~AFCL
    +1
    No sir, I respectfully disagree. This report reads that anyone who appears to:

    1. Disgree with the current government policies.
    2. Has a strong disposition towards supporting the 2nd Amendment.
    3. Has a strong disagreement with pro choice policies

    Are categorized as right wing extremists.
  • let's v... Riceman... 2009/04/15 16:06:17
    let's vote already
    +1
    Your interpretation appears to neglect the fact that these individuals are not assumed to be extremists, yet may be recruited, either successfully or not, by extremists groups due to their common ideologies. This report in no way implies that people who hold any of the views you list as extremists simply because of an individual's beliefs.

    Personal convictions and beliefs are quite different from belonging to a militia organization intent on overthrowing the government or a white supremacist organization who targets violence against minorities. The vast majority of Americans who hold these beliefs would not join an extremist group. This is a known factor to law enforcement everywhere, and why they look for the exceptions (radical or extremist elements) which may cause harm to the broader society.
  • Riceman... let's v... 2009/04/15 16:08:45
    RicemanSTM ~POTL~PWCM~JLA~AFCL
    +1
    But when you time the "public" release of an assessment of this type, just before a large number of anti-government protests are scheduled, it does make one suspicious. Theoretically, anyone attending or organizing one of these Tea Parties could be easily labeled as an extremist.

About Me

Sherlock Dog BL - a Gazillion

Sherlock Dog BL - a Gazillion

United States

2009/03/29 09:53:56

View complete profile

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals

The Latest From SodaHead

News

Politics