"Too many people have a deeply vested interest in keeping the masses divided and against each other." (However, I certainly do not.)
This I don't agree with...
"And it's still beneath you.
You're better than this."
Unless everyone who agrees with how you and I feel on this issue, which I believe is similar, start really talking about it, it will never get "resolved", if that can happen.
So throw rocks at me...I don't care. I've had them thrown before, by people who don't know me at all.
You've seen me in action; you know how truly vicious I can be when provoked.
But I have no need to be that way with you; you're one of my e-buds, and you're always respectful even when we disagree.
And so that's how I treat you in return.
That being said, I've seen far too many good people, of both political affiliations, get completely sucked into the toxicity of this site and the perpetual mindless hatred that's encouraged here.
Sadly that's also why so many quality members leave.
So I say again; YOU ARE BETTER THAN THIS.
Lets not do Fef's dirty work for him; after all, when he makes money off this site he doesn't share any it with us, does he?
Bessie that just isn't true. There is a Jewish Caucus, Asian Caucus, and a Hispanic Caucus. That meme was made by a person who was just trying to perpetuate a lie that many fall for. In addition they were created because congress which is and always have been majority White have tried to prevent certain groups from being within Congress.
I don't believe in any "groupings" when it comes to race, any!
You Stated: "In addition they were created because congress which is and always have been majority White have tried to prevent certain groups from being within Congress."
If true, which I do believe you, I don't agree with that either.
It has already been stated in several other posts that there are in fact caucus' for the other groups as well as several hundred you have not mentioned. Why are you even bothering to answer back to those that 'agree' with your uninformed poll now?
I understand the point, but I think that with so many issues each congressman is expected to deal with, it is essential to divvy up some of this stuff. Plus the mutual support.
That would require dismantling an entire system which perpetuates the idea that we are all many different "races" as opposed to just one; the human one.
The "dismantling of the entire system" is being done as we speak. There seems to be no goal for real equality but as we are seeing through the DOJ and present inhabitant of the WH. I'm with you for the no groupings idea but I've seen the payback mentality too often these days. good luck with Latrice.
If anyone would bother to actually look into the facts you would learn that there is a Latino caucus and an Asian one. There is pretty much a caucus for every group you can think of.
No, not at all. But that doesn't change the fact that their is a caucus for every single group you coulkd possibly imagine b/c that's how politics works: everyone forms a committee to pursue the agenda for their particular special interest group.
LOL- liberals are sooooooooooo funny in that they can't see a problem with a race based caucus – BTW do all “black people” agree with that groups anti second amendment campaign ?
LOL- fact is most have no idea what that group or angry nuts are up to I see plenty of people of color at the gun rang , and I see them as just other Americans who love freedom and shooting just like i do -
See above.
not good...
I'd love to get 'post racial'; but it has to be a concerted, uniform effort, on all fronts; worldwide.
And that wont happen until this society as we know it has collapsed, unfortunately.
Too many people have a deeply vested interest in keeping the masses divided and against each other.
You're better than this.
"Too many people have a deeply vested interest in keeping the masses divided and against each other." (However, I certainly do not.)
This I don't agree with...
"And it's still beneath you.
You're better than this."
Unless everyone who agrees with how you and I feel on this issue, which I believe is similar, start really talking about it, it will never get "resolved", if that can happen.
So throw rocks at me...I don't care. I've had them thrown before, by people who don't know me at all.
I'm not "throwing rocks."
You've seen me in action; you know how truly vicious I can be when provoked.
But I have no need to be that way with you; you're one of my e-buds, and you're always respectful even when we disagree.
And so that's how I treat you in return.
That being said, I've seen far too many good people, of both political affiliations, get completely sucked into the toxicity of this site and the perpetual mindless hatred that's encouraged here.
Sadly that's also why so many quality members leave.
So I say again; YOU ARE BETTER THAN THIS.
Lets not do Fef's dirty work for him; after all, when he makes money off this site he doesn't share any it with us, does he?
http://kildee.house.gov/about...
http://capac-chu.house.gov/
http://chc-gonzalez.house.gov/
http://www.jta.org/news/artic...
http://www.ajcongress.org/sit...
You Stated: "In addition they were created because congress which is and always have been majority White have tried to prevent certain groups from being within Congress."
If true, which I do believe you, I don't agree with that either.
You need to look closer.
mutual support....or mutual dislike ?
Good luck with that, Bessie.
So, you are a fan of racist separation, eh?