This is what True American Heroes look like -
Ronald Reagan
Allen West
Pat Tillman
Martin Luther King Jr
Todd Beamer
Mark Bingham
Thomas Burnett, Jr
Jeremy Glick
Ronald Reagan
Allen West
Pat Tillman
Martin Luther King Jr
Todd Beamer
Mark Bingham
Thomas Burnett, Jr
Jeremy Glick
This is what True American Heroes look like -
Ronald Reagan
Allen West
Pat Tillman
Martin Luther King Jr
Todd Beamer
Mark Bingham
Thomas Burnett, Jr
Jeremy Glick
(more)Ronald Reagan
Allen West
Pat Tillman
Martin Luther King Jr
Todd Beamer
Mark Bingham
Thomas Burnett, Jr
Jeremy Glick






















Obama isn't my ideal of the perfect President, but nothing is perfect in this world. I give the man a thumbs up and the go ahead for a 2nd term with the poor alternative republicans have offered with Romney as their candidate.
At least half the problem is that the republicans counted on Obama failing miserably, when that didn't happen they got desperate with their stupid "pacts" in Congress and every other political trick they could think of. Obama stayed persistent using his constitutional powers as President best he was able.
For many years it has been something of an article of faith with both the hard left and the libertarian right in America that it really doesn’t make any difference – Democrat or Republican. They all come from the same political elite cloth, they are ultimately working in the interests of a ruling class or some super-secret elite cabal, and those interests are ultimately determined by the hard truths of the economic substrata. .. There is always that knowing, cynical French observation, “plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose” – the more things change, the more they stay the same.
This truth was evident this month when Romney was interviewed by Time’s Mark Halperin.
Halperin asked:
You have a plan, as you said, over a number of years, to reduce spending dramatically. Why not in the first year, if you’re elected — why not in 2013, go all the way and propose the kind of budget with spending restraints, that you’d like to see after four years in office? Why not do it more quickly?
Romney answered:
Well because, if you take a trillion dollars for instance, out of the first year of the federal budget, that would shrink GDP over 5%. That is by definition throwing us into recession or depression. S...
&
For many years it has been something of an article of faith with both the hard left and the libertarian right in America that it really doesn’t make any difference – Democrat or Republican. They all come from the same political elite cloth, they are ultimately working in the interests of a ruling class or some super-secret elite cabal, and those interests are ultimately determined by the hard truths of the economic substrata. .. There is always that knowing, cynical French observation, “plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose” – the more things change, the more they stay the same.
This truth was evident this month when Romney was interviewed by Time’s Mark Halperin.
Halperin asked:
You have a plan, as you said, over a number of years, to reduce spending dramatically. Why not in the first year, if you’re elected — why not in 2013, go all the way and propose the kind of budget with spending restraints, that you’d like to see after four years in office? Why not do it more quickly?
Romney answered:
Well because, if you take a trillion dollars for instance, out of the first year of the federal budget, that would shrink GDP over 5%. That is by definition throwing us into recession or depression. So I’m not going to do that, of course.
If not the first year, then when? By President Romney’s fourth year? Probably not. Romney wants to cut taxes/revenues and increase military spending.
Meanwhile, Obama has proposed reducing the size of the military following the end of the U.S. combat role in Iraq and plans to remove troops from Afghanistan by the end of 2014.
“We have two courses we can follow: One is to follow the pathway of Europe. To shrink our military smaller and smaller to pay for our social needs,” Romney said a month ago. “The other is to commit to preserve America as the strongest military in the world, second to none, with no comparable power anywhere in the world.”
The Obama Administration and Republicans in Congress have agreed to cut almost $500 billion dollars in military spending over the next decade. But even with that reduction, the United States would own the world’s most powerful military. The Pentagon’s budget this year exceeds $600 billion, or six times the amount of money that China is spending on its military.
Yet Romney will need more, especially since he has been painting Russia with the same stain as the “Evil Empire” that was the Soviet Union. But Romney needs to check recent history. The Soviets imploded because they could no longer finance their global aspirations. Neither can the United States.
A Warning, Not An Obama Endorsement
The truth is that, if elected, Romney will carry on most of Obama’s spending programs. That means a continuation of massive deficit spending by Washington and the near certainty that the United States will be thrown in the trash heap of history. This is not to say Romney won’t be better than Obama. It is hard to imagine he could be worse. But expect him to be only incrementally better at a time when the United States needs an exceptional President.
One final note: If Romney wins the Presidency, expect him and Obama to be friends once Romney’s tenure in the Oval Office is over. Historians may someday refer to them as dumb and dumber.
Yours in good times and bad,
–John Myers
Editor, Myers’ Energy & Gold Report
http://personalliberty.com/20...
Ronald Reagan
Allen West
Pat Tillman
Martin Luther King Jr
Todd Beamer
Mark Bingham
Thomas Burnett, Jr
Jeremy Glick
Ronald Reagan
Allen West
Pat Tillman
Martin Luther King Jr
Todd Beamer
Mark Bingham
Thomas Burnett, Jr
Jeremy Glick