Here's how Sandra Fluke can save $1000 a year!
RJ~PWCM~JLA
2012/03/16 21:40:31
Sandra Fluke famously told Congress that "contraception can cost a woman over $3000 during law school." She said for students "like me", that's "practically an entire summer's salary."
Well here's a way for her to save thousands on her contraception bill! And what's more, this method was found to be more reliable at preventing pregnancy than birth control pills!
The downside? The woman would either have to forgo sexual intercourse during her fertile period (usually about 7-8 days) each month, or use another suitable form of contraception - which will most likely cost something.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/02/070221065200.htm
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Well here's a way for her to save thousands on her contraception bill! And what's more, this method was found to be more reliable at preventing pregnancy than birth control pills!
The downside? The woman would either have to forgo sexual intercourse during her fertile period (usually about 7-8 days) each month, or use another suitable form of contraception - which will most likely cost something.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/02/070221065200.htm
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
ScienceDaily (Feb. 21, 2007) — Researchers have found that a method of natural family planning that uses two indicators to identify the fertile phase in a woman's menstrual cycle is as effective as the contraceptive pill for avoiding unplanned pregnancies if used correctly, according to a report published online in Europe's leading reproductive medicine journal Human Reproduction today (21 February).
The symptothermal method (STM) is a form of natural family planning (NFP) that enables couples to identify accurately the time of the woman's fertile phase by measuring her temperature and observing cervical secretions. In the largest, prospective study of STM, the researchers found that if the couples then either abstained from sex or used a barrier method during the fertile period, the rate of unplanned pregnancies per year was 0.4% and 0.6% respectively. Out of all the 900 women who took part in the study, including those who had unprotected sex during their fertile period, 1.8 per 100 became unintentionally pregnant.
The lead author of the report, Petra Frank-Herrmann, assistant professor and managing director of the natural fertility section in the Department of Gynaecological Endocrinology at the University of Heidelberg, Germany, said: "For a contraceptive method to be rated as highly efficient as the hormonal pill, there should be less than one pregnancy per 100 women per year when the method is used correctly. The pregnancy rate for women who used the STM method correctly in our study was 0.4%, which can be interpreted as one pregnancy occurring per 250 women per year. Therefore, we maintain that the effectiveness of STM is comparable to the effectiveness of modern contraceptive methods such as oral contraceptives, and is an effective and acceptable method of family planning."
Read the whole thing:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/02/070221065200.htm
Read the whole thing:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/02/070221065200.htm
Read More: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/02/07022...
Top Opinion
-
WhereIsAmerica? ~PWCM~JLA 2012/03/16 21:45:22
Thank you for your reply
......DONATE...
The gist of this would be a face to face.
Yeah, right. Only in the bizzare-o world of someone who'd suggest such an irrational concept.