Here Comes "more" of the crazies from the right.

by Manuel Posted 2012/08/23 02:55:56

Related Topics: Opinions, Liberals, Obama, Democrat, White House, The White House, Senate, right wing, Guns, War, FBI, Boy, Newspaper, Emergency, United States, Troops, Democrats, President Obama

Read More

Read all 434 opinions

Well...the other day FBI caught a guy from the right with guns and bombs
wanting assassinate Obama...Now we got a crazy Texas judge saying
stupid unproved stuff just to excite all the stupid people on the right
to actually start a civil war in this country against Liberals who
support Obama ...The good old boys right wing white club has gone
crazy...just read this...

As if the negative political ads
aren't enough, now a county judge in Lubbock, Texas, predicts possible
"civil war" if President Obama is re-elected.

Judge Tom Head was on a local TV news show
making his case for a tax increase, when he said hiring extra sheriff's
deputies would especially be needed if Obama wins in November.

From Lubbock's Fox 34 News:

"He's
going to try to hand over the sovereignty of the United States to the
U.N., and what is going to happen when that happens?," Head asked.

"I'm thinking the worst. Civil
unrest, civil disobedience, civil war maybe. And we're not just talking a
few riots here and demonstrations, we're talking Lexington, Concord,
take up arms and get rid of the guy.

"Now what's going to happen if we
do that, if the public decides to do that? He's going to send in U.N.
troops. I don't want 'em in Lubbock County. OK. So I'm going to stand in
front of their armored personnel carrier and say 'you're not coming in
here'.

"And the sheriff, I've already
asked him, I said 'you gonna back me' he said, 'yeah, I'll back you'.
Well, I don't want a bunch of rookies back there. I want trained,
equipped, seasoned veteran officers to back me."

Sheriff Kelly Rowe told a Lubbock newspaper reporter he has never discussed any of the scenarios with the judge.

On Wednesday, Judge Head explained his remarks in a video interview with the Lubbock Avalanche-Journal.
He said his original comments were taken out of context. But as the
county's emergency management director, he said he has to keep a "worst
case scenario" in mind if Obama returns to the White House and Democrats
control the Senate.

"I have some opinions what
they're doing and what they're trying to do if they stay in power," he
said. "And I have to prepare for that."

Well talk about crazy?.....stay tuned for more right wing crazies...

FindingHeartInThisCrazy World 2012/08/23 03:35:23

+7
I saw the interview and heard the words come right out of his mouth. something needs to be done to confront the right wing bullies we have in this country. they are dangerous.
>> See Replies

More polls by Manuel

ur XLNC 2012/08/24 23:26:34

+5
Sorry to disappoint you, but the judge predicts the event IF Obama tries to surrender our nations sovereignty to the UN.The problem here is RE-electing Obama from Obama's point of view would possibly be a 'mandate to do just that. If this should occur and you damn fools finally wake up, it might very well be TOO LATE to undo the damage How is it that your crowd is hell-bent on IGNORING Obama's anti-American and UNCONSTITUTIONAL behavior?

reply
Manuel to ur XLNC 2012/08/25 03:08:15

surrender our nations sovereignty to the U.N....so you explain to me how that affects yours and my way of life...and surrender is not the right word...

reply
ur XLNC to Manuel 2012/08/25 17:18:08 (edited)

+5
If I have to explain this to you, then you aren't capable of understanding. THIS is a NO-BRAINER!

reply
Manuel to ur XLNC 2012/08/25 19:09:35

your stalling....explain to me how that affects yours and my way of life....because the answer is...it doesn't...

reply
DeeB to Manuel 2012/08/25 20:33:53

+4
Wow, that would be the end of life as you knew it, I mean do you really have to ask that stupid question? No freaken wonder this country is going down!

reply
Manuel to DeeB 2012/08/25 20:39:16

okay then ....explain to me how that affects yours and my way of life....because the answer is...it doesn't...

reply
Boblawbla to Manuel 2012/08/25 20:53:15

+4
You are asking how relinquishing our sovereignty to the UN affects our way of life. Are you talking about now or "if" we knuckle under even more in the future? Did you get a load of the recent quorum in the UN to try to ban guns with that Arms Trade Treaty? If the world has to do what is decided at the UN we need no Constitution because the UN would over-ride the Bill of Rights. That's called the New World Order dude.

And apparently you aren't aware of the World Court in Belgium? Your rights to due process here is not respected in Belgium or the UN.

reply
Manuel to Boblawbla 2012/08/26 03:37:01 (edited)

your wrong...we been members living under the UN world rules for a long time...and since then we have had the rights to bear arms and live by our Bill of rights in our land. Nothing is gonna chance that dude... So why the change now? Because it's just one of the many blown out proportions of rumors and made up stories coming out from the right wing propaganda machine about "What Obama will do according to the right"......You all all just drinking the Dick Morris kool aide...

reply
Boblawbla to Manuel 2012/08/26 13:21:42

+4
"The Obama administration was under pressure to delay or walk away from an agreement. Fifty-one senators had urged the administration not to sign it in a letter sent Thursday. That letter sent an important signal of defeat because ratification requires 67 Senate votes.

“As defenders of the right of Americans to keep and bear arms, we write to express our grave concern about the dangers posed by the United Nations’ arms trade treaty,” the senators said in the letter to President Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton. “Our country’s sovereignty and the constitutional protection of these individual freedoms must not be infringed.”

Take a look dud... this was from the a "leftist rag" the New York Times:

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/0...

reply
Manuel to Boblawbla 2012/08/27 04:24:44

after reading it...it has nothing to do with legal guns...like a hand gun or a deer hunting gun etc...but it seems what they would like to do is put a stop on big weapons flowing through borders all over gthe world made to kill people like war weapons example, M 16's AK 47's , dangerous rapid firing small arms...rocket bazookas etc...you know things like that. They don't want weapons like that to be sold to civilians or rouge nations legal or illegally ... so, the question is...do you really need an M16 and a bazooka in your home?...

reply
Boblawbla to Manuel 2012/08/27 16:08:05

+1
Look Manny, I can only say that your interpretation of the ATT of the UN is your own. I don't want the UN making decisions about large or small arms and whether or not I can own one. I don't want the UN deciding on things like free speech or freedom to go to what ever church I choose either. Do you really want to give the UN the power to alter our constitution? If we are limited to only what the rights the UN want us to have, how can you do so without altering the constitution and Bill of Rights?

So please give me any link that supports your contention that this UN Arms Trade Treaty means only large guns or bazookas. I have not seen that information.

reply
Manuel to Boblawbla 2012/08/27 19:53:45

+1
the question is...do you really need an M16 and a bazooka in your home?...well do ya dude? Answer is ,NO.... no one here in America does...unless they are planing to becoming whacked out terrorist revolutionist hell bent on destroying our government. If I knew some one here with weapons like this, I would tell the authorities.

No where does the info you gave me say our NORMAL gun rights will be revoked...you haven't posted a link that claims that...no where does your link say all Americans will have their guns or rights taken away.

But what it does imply is war weapons such as M16's AK 47's etc type of guns can be confiscated legally.
If you want to live were people use weapons like that on each others...move to a middle eastern nation...and good luck to you. :)

reply
Boblawbla to Manuel 2012/08/27 23:40:18

+2
Imply? So you show me the verbiage that implies we would have ANY RIGHTS AT ALL? You are grasping at straws to defend your yearning to be controlled by the UN and lose our sovereignty.

reply
Manuel to Boblawbla 2012/08/28 00:32:15 (edited)

the question is...do you really need an M16 and a bazooka in your home? which you did not answer.

And since you didn't answer that...I don't have to play your game about the UN which is just a right wing lie...

The real truth about this UN thing is about the millions of dollars weapons manufactures make selling their arms...legal and illegally.. and their NRA lobbyist are spreading more fears among the uninformed such as you by tying to inject that into our society by saying this is going against the rights for Americans to bear arms...What a freaking evil lie..

...The UN resolution is to discourage arms sales to populations in the Middle east and Africa and other rouge Nations where their availability encourages wide spread violence , ethic cleansing, tribal killings in poor nations and gang related warfare in modern world cities , etc...

American conservative manufactures find these places profitable markets and so oppose the UN idea and turned it into Americans losing their gun rights to stop this UN deal from happening.

Semi automatic military weapons have but one purpose - to kill another human or wipe out a society .... No crazy right or left wing person or groups living here or abroad should have access to these kinds of weapons...

reply
Boblawbla to Manuel 2012/08/28 00:39:33

No I do not need nor do I plan to have a M-16 or a bazooka in my home. I do however take exception to a foreign body to tell me whether I can or not. Do you plan to stand on a soapbox and speak to a crowd? Do you reserve that right in our Constitution? Do you plan to be arrested and be brought before a jury? Do you want to keep the right to due process?

You are such a sad case.... but you have company throughout this nation. People who are in a huge hurry to give up our Constitutional rights.

Well... do you punk?

reply
Manuel to Boblawbla 2012/08/28 03:37:37

punk? LOLROF....
AGAIN...The real truth about this UN thing is about the millions of dollars weapons manufactures make selling their arms...legal and illegally.. and their NRA lobbyist are spreading more fears among the uninformed such as you by tying to inject that into our society by saying this is going against the rights for Americans to bear arms...What a freaking evil lie...by a bunch of TROLLS.

reply
Boblawbla to Manuel 2012/08/28 00:41:53

And one more thing.... I do want to keep and bear arms meant to shoot other human beings. I want to keep the US government from taking all my rights as laid out in the constitution. Aside from hunting, why would anyone want a gun in their home if not to shoot other humans?

reply
Manuel to Boblawbla 2012/08/28 03:43:59

So let me see here...you want a gun to shoot at the government if they take your rights away....do you know how delusional and skewed that sounds?

you want a gun to shoot at the government if they take your rights away....LOLROF... I will play along for the amusement...

Okay lets say the big bad government is coming to your home to take your rights away...you shoot them with a big M60 machine gun. What do you think will happen to you?

reply
Boblawbla to Manuel 2012/08/28 14:36:11

When your son comes to kick in my door to take away my guns I will kill him. Why do you think the right to keep guns was not only put into the Constitution but as 2nd Amendment? Did you think the founding fathers wanted to ensure that people are allowed to hunt game? It was to ensure that the people would have the power to keep the rights the Constitution gave us... unalienable rights. And if that means shooting humans, so be it.

You sure have an odd sense of humor. You literally laugh out loud rolling on the floor?

When the government kicks in enough doors they'll get the message.

reply
Boblawbla to Manuel 2012/08/28 00:43:25

And you are the one who decides who is a "crazy right or left wing person"?

And what the hell is a "rouge" nation?

reply
Manuel to Boblawbla 2012/08/28 03:45:34

rogue...nation...

reply
Boblawbla to Manuel 2012/08/28 14:37:52

Okay so you tell me then, who decides who is a crazy left or right wing person? Who decides? You?

reply
DeeB to Manuel 2012/08/27 23:50:06

+2
What one needs doesn't matter. It is our right and they are starting with the big ones and working their way down. Ask all the other countries that have been disarmed. I say the damned governments should be disarmed and all the people should be armed. Imagine living with no wars and the criminals will be kept at bay or pay. Now tell me why Social Security would need hollow point ammo, or why the government is arming every damned agency with them.

reply
Boblawbla to DeeB 2012/08/28 00:04:29

+2
He has never even heard of the Social Security Admin buying up thousands of rounds of hollow point cartridges. And no amount of proof will matter to him. Wait and see.....

reply
DeeB to Boblawbla 2012/08/28 00:05:51

+2
I don't think he knows much of what is going on around him. Wait till it hits home, he'll be changing his tune right quick!

reply
Boblawbla to DeeB 2012/08/28 00:07:37

+2
That's my point here on this guy, he's just like so many others who support Romney or Obama. They could be caught red-handed and it would not be true..... he will go to his grave kissing the image of his messiah.

reply
DeeB to Boblawbla 2012/08/28 00:14:47

+1
So said not to have a brain!! Just common sense would be nice!

reply
Boblawbla to DeeB 2012/08/28 00:16:44

+1
He would wile away the hours, conversing with the flowers, cavorting with the rain, with the thoughts he'd be thinkin' he could be another Lincoln.... if......

reply
Boblawbla to DeeB 2012/08/28 00:48:59

+1
If he only had a brain... I thought you'd finish that line for me. LOL

reply
DeeB to Boblawbla 2012/09/02 17:32:23

+1
Oh Duh! Mine must not have been working at the time!!

reply
Manuel to DeeB 2012/08/28 00:39:40

The real truth about this UN thing is about the millions of dollars weapons manufactures make selling their arms...legal and illegally.. and their NRA lobbyist are spreading more fears among the uninformed such as you by tying to inject that into our society by saying this is going against the rights for Americans to bear arms...What a freaking evil lie..

...The UN resolution is to discourage arms sales to populations in the Middle east and Africa and other rouge Nations where their availability encourages wide spread violence , ethic cleansing, tribal killings in poor nations and gang related warfare in modern world cities , etc...

American conservative manufactures find these places profitable markets and so oppose the UN idea and turned it into Americans losing their gun rights to stop this UN deal from happening.

Semi automatic military weapons have but one purpose - to kill another human or wipe out a society .... No crazy right or left wing person or groups living here or abroad should have access to these kinds of weapons...

reply
DeeB to Manuel 2012/08/28 00:43:28

+1
So now you can explain why the government has all the weapons and more to use against the people and then explain how this is right. Why are they arming themselves with so much hollow point ammo?

reply
Boblawbla to DeeB 2012/08/28 00:48:22

+1
He's using that old "copy/paste" routine... verbatim! LOL

reply
Manuel to DeeB 2012/08/28 03:49:05 (edited)

LOLROF you are being foolish...but I will play along...so the government comes to your house and takes your rights away...what do you do about it honey?

reply
DeeB to Manuel 2012/09/02 17:35:05

I'm foolish because the government is arming themselves with millions of hollow point ammo? LOL! Okay!! You didn't answer my question, but that's how you roll isn't it, answer a question with another question. Because you don't have an answer.

reply
Boblawbla to Manuel 2012/08/28 00:51:58

+1
Okay, copy and past works for me....

The real truth about this UN thing is NOT about the millions of dollars weapons manufactures make selling their arms...legal and illegally.. and their NRA lobbyist are NOT spreading more fears among the uninformed such as you by tying to inject that into our society by saying this is going against the rights for Americans to bear arms...What a freaking IDIOT YOU ARE..

...The UN resolution is NOT to discourage arms sales to populations in the Middle east and Africa and other rouge(SP) Nations where their availability encourages wide spread violence , ethic cleansing, tribal killings in poor nations and gang related warfare in modern world cities , etc...

reply
ConLibF... to Manuel 2012/08/27 23:55:18 (edited)

+2
The Founding Fathers provided the 2nd Amendment for the main purpose to give We The People the ability to arm and defend ourselves against the tyrannical government. Pistols are no match for the guns that the government, military and UN have. You need to better understand history.

reply
DeeB to ConLibF... 2012/08/28 00:01:55

+2

reply
ConLibF... to DeeB 2012/08/28 00:09:38

+2
People flat out do not understand the constitution starting with the 2nd Amendment.

reply
Boblawbla to ConLibF... 2012/08/28 00:14:51

+1
And I guarantee that they would shoot you for exercising the 1st Amendment if you get in their way.

reply