Quantcast

HEATHROW PREDICTS MASSIVE GRIDLOCK IN STRIKE

BlueMax372 2011/11/26 18:33:24
LONDON -- A public sector strike in Britain next week threatens to paralyze operations at Heathrow, Europe's busiest airport.

BAA, the airport's operator, said Friday 12-hour delays for arriving passengers are likely because the November 30 strike will hit the U.K. Border Agency's ability to support normal operations.

An estimated 2 million workers are expected to protest changes in public sector pensions with a 24-hour walkout -- billed as potentially the biggest union action since 1979.

The lines at Heathrow's immigration counters are expected to be so long that passengers will need to be held on planes, BAA warned.


--From wire reports; The St. Augustine Record, November 26, 2011, p. 8A.

Read More: http://www.staugustine.com

You!
Add Photos & Videos

Top Opinion

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Katherine 2011/12/24 15:25:25
    Katherine
    Yet another strike. No one's going to get it until there's a total collapse, and even then I'm not so sure.
  • shadow76 2011/11/29 18:40:58
    shadow76
    +1
    Stay in USA then.
  • Torchmanner ~PWCM~JLA 2011/11/26 23:11:49
    Torchmanner ~PWCM~JLA
    +3
    Public employees should not be allowed to form a union.
  • BlueMax372 Torchma... 2011/11/30 01:47:38
    BlueMax372
    I contend that they should be able to unionize because I have dealt first hand with municipal governments that have dealt in bad faith. However, in the interest of public safety, they should not be allowed to strike.
  • Rodney 2011/11/26 20:59:14
    Rodney
    +4
    When will these unionist realize that if things are not brought under control, economies will collapse and then they get NOTHING! Once that happens, do you think we will see them out protesting against Socialism? No, I don't think so either. Why is it, so many of these "gimme" mentalities cannot see that it is unsustainable to constantly give them freebies?
  • Angi 2011/11/26 20:28:13
    Angi
    Well I support them, and the right to strike. This Government are taking the p*ss and its wrong. They don't negotiate they are out of touch and out of ideas. The only reason this Government is making people pay more and getting less out is because of the mess the banks have done. Never mind blaming the public sector have a go at the ones responsible for this mess. Personally I don't mind paying for a nurse, a doctor, a teacher or a cleaner, porter, roadsweeper, dustbin man, who are committed to the job. If some one teaches my children well, then that to me is pricelss.
  • Rodney Angi 2011/11/26 21:01:29
    Rodney
    +4
    You don't think JUST maybe that the government is out of money and knows that IF something isn't done, the whole economy will collapse and then all those who think they are owed huge pensions will get NOTHING?
  • Angi Rodney 2011/11/26 21:22:26 (edited)
    Angi
    Their pensions aren't huge. The Government is basically telling them what to do. The coalition Government is in power although no one voted for their policies. The Primeminister and his Chancellor among others, are millionaires educated at public school, (what we call private) and they have no idea of life in a normal working class background. They are telling people some low paid and on average earnings that you put in more you get less out, its basically a compulsory pay cut. Many in the public sector have agreed pay freezes to help the economy. Even though its not their fault the economy suffers. The Government try to play the private sector against the public sector, which is just a ploy. Everyone if they pay into a pension should get a proper pension at the end of it. Some people have already increased their deductions towards their pension and are now being asked to contribute more. The Government will not negotiate and are being obstructive, thats no way to run a country. The MPs are public sector workers as well, they aren't being asked to contribute the same.
  • Rodney Angi 2011/11/26 22:29:15
    Rodney
    +4
    What part of Unfunded do you not understand?
  • Angi Rodney 2011/11/28 17:04:08
    Angi
    Well the Government could sack everyone that would save them a fortune. But oh hang they cant do that because the country would come to a standstill. The Tories look out for their rich friends i.e the bankers and expect joe bloggs to look after the tax bill, by taking the brunt of the cuts. Oh and now they are upset that the joe bloggs wont stand for it, well tough, its time this Government starting bringing in some proper policies instead of the ones that nobody voted for and were not diclosed in their manifesto. They talk to the nation with no respect for the people that vote this Government into power and then they expect us to sit back and take it. Think again.
  • Rodney Angi 2011/11/28 18:27:26
    Rodney
    +1
    The truth of the matter is that, just like here and Greece (the extreme case) the government has over extended themselves with entitlement programs that are largely unfunded and now face the reality that somehow they have to start living within their budgets. They HAVE start cutting back on the freebies or raise taxes on NOT only the rich (the rich are the very ones who risk money to create jobs). You could tax the rich 100% and still not cover the liabilities and eventually the rich would have no more money. Where do they go after they drain the rich?
  • BlueMax372 Rodney 2011/11/28 18:33:53 (edited)
    BlueMax372
    Prediction: If 0v0mit is ousted from office in 2012, the American economy will begin to show an immediate recovery, even before January 20, 2013. Better yet, if he's ousted by a conservative, an economic boom will develop before inauguration day.
  • Rodney BlueMax372 2011/11/28 18:40:11
    Rodney
    I could never take that bet, unless Romney is elected. No one knows for sure where Romney stands on anything. In my view he is Obammy Lite. Sadly, I don't think we are going to see any New Candidates jump in that sparks the whole base, so it will be another "settle for" scenario. There was good news this morning though, Bawney Fwank is retiring. Have to guess it's for one of three reasons, He has read the writing on the wall that the American People are leaning away from the Big Government, Control All Mentality...or... he has some impending doom coming his way...OR ... he was to fire up his Male Prostitution Business again.
  • Angi Rodney 2011/11/29 21:23:05
    Angi
    When you offer a argument like that are you saying the rich are untouchable and so the vast majority of the working class and middle class have to pay the tax bill. I watched Parliament today on TV and MP's from both sides were asking the Chancellor questions. I can honestly say that the Chancellor of the Exchequor comes across has a rich and bureaucratic moron. He will not except a argument if it doesn't fit within his reasoning. He said to one lady MP, that she should have listened to his question or response to dismiss her statement or question. He said to another who highlighted conditions for a nurse working in the public sector that he didn't accept that argument and another who was highlighting the inequalities in the country at the moment, i.e. families being given food parcels by religious groups while bankers and executives give themselves million pound bonuses. The Chancellor said his comment was ludicrous. When you have a Government who announce that nurses and teachers are militants and you have a Government that tries denounce honest working people who pay taxes, you are dealing with a Government that is closed to any other opinion than that of their party and their friends and yes men and women. If this Government decide to take this stand point instead ...
    When you offer a argument like that are you saying the rich are untouchable and so the vast majority of the working class and middle class have to pay the tax bill. I watched Parliament today on TV and MP's from both sides were asking the Chancellor questions. I can honestly say that the Chancellor of the Exchequor comes across has a rich and bureaucratic moron. He will not except a argument if it doesn't fit within his reasoning. He said to one lady MP, that she should have listened to his question or response to dismiss her statement or question. He said to another who highlighted conditions for a nurse working in the public sector that he didn't accept that argument and another who was highlighting the inequalities in the country at the moment, i.e. families being given food parcels by religious groups while bankers and executives give themselves million pound bonuses. The Chancellor said his comment was ludicrous. When you have a Government who announce that nurses and teachers are militants and you have a Government that tries denounce honest working people who pay taxes, you are dealing with a Government that is closed to any other opinion than that of their party and their friends and yes men and women. If this Government decide to take this stand point instead of negotiating then we are in for a unpleasant time. We need a democratic Government who will listen to its voting public and if they find a difficulty don't slam the door, talk, discuss, negotiate. We are being run by a aristocratic elite, who have never had to choose between food, heating or clothing. They just don't get it. I will probably be inconvenienced tomorrow, but I spoke to people today on the phone who are striking tomorrow. They are low paid to average earners, just like anyone else. The tactics of the private sector against the public sector will back fire on this Government, because sooner or later everyone will wake up that they are being stuffed by this Government. Your argument re the wealth created by the rich is flawed, people who have no money can create wealth and jobs given the right opportunity. The rich are keeping the money and making more and the people who are paying for their wealth are the ones with none. Your wealth creation is working backwards and just feathering the nests of the wealth the rich have already got.
    (more)
  • Rodney Angi 2011/11/29 22:29:41
    Rodney
    +1
    What I am saying is that all the Social Engineering that has gone on has run up massive debt and HAS to be dealt with. You cannot continue to run up debt and expect others to pay for it. There is no such thing as an inexhaustible amount of money. There will always be the have and have lesses. I have seen too often how governments make promises to tighten their belts if only they are granted more money now, only to forget those promises after they have spend the extra money. Until our elected officials get their belts tightened and take a hold of all the unfunded mandates they have created, they should NOT be given more money. I have yet to see ANY government in any country who handles money responsibly. Socialism simply DOES NOT work. Government CANNOT give everything to everybody! To fix the mess WE have allowed and pushed them to create is going to cause pain everywhere, but if it NOT done, every nation that is in that situation WILL fail. Once they fail, then NO ONE will have anything.
  • Angi Rodney 2011/12/02 22:15:19
    Angi
    I understand what you say and agree with some of it. But socialism did not cause this financial mess it was the capitalist banks. Here regulations were set for the banks the banks approached Government asked for less regulation and they got it and then the banks failed. If anything it was nationalising the banks that stopped them from failing. We own the banks now and they are still giving themselves huge bonuses. Its scandalous. No one said including the public sector themselves that they didn't know they had to put more into their pensions, its wrong the way this Government are doing things and the way they are trying to demonise the public sector. In what kind of society would a Government pitch one set of people against another. Its just wrong. No body is saying this Government or country has a bottomless pit of money it dosen't but the disparity between the wealthest and the not so is huge. Why do you have to fix this financial climate by taxing and taking from the poorest or middle incomes the most. Our Government is quick to promote a Big Society and we are all in it together. Big Society that is only for the ones that think they own society and we are most definitely not all in it together. How can top earners and the wealthiest Chief Executive and share h...
    I understand what you say and agree with some of it. But socialism did not cause this financial mess it was the capitalist banks. Here regulations were set for the banks the banks approached Government asked for less regulation and they got it and then the banks failed. If anything it was nationalising the banks that stopped them from failing. We own the banks now and they are still giving themselves huge bonuses. Its scandalous. No one said including the public sector themselves that they didn't know they had to put more into their pensions, its wrong the way this Government are doing things and the way they are trying to demonise the public sector. In what kind of society would a Government pitch one set of people against another. Its just wrong. No body is saying this Government or country has a bottomless pit of money it dosen't but the disparity between the wealthest and the not so is huge. Why do you have to fix this financial climate by taxing and taking from the poorest or middle incomes the most. Our Government is quick to promote a Big Society and we are all in it together. Big Society that is only for the ones that think they own society and we are most definitely not all in it together. How can top earners and the wealthiest Chief Executive and share holders make a fortune when the rest of us are broke. We need growth and we haven't any. No one is talking about socialism its about economics and no one is making any money apart from a small percentage of people and they aren't investing it they are using it to make more money and keeping it. The top earners are sometimes referred to as the wealth creators it was they that betted their money in crazy schemes and guess what they lost. They would have done better putting their money on a horse or a dog at least they stood a good chance of getting a return if their animal had crossed the line.
    (more)
  • Rodney Angi 2011/12/02 22:31:04
    Rodney
    +2
    So you are saying that all the unfunded Government programs have nothing to do with the deficits and national debt there or here?
  • Angi Rodney 2011/12/08 20:31:55
    Angi
    It depends on what country you are on about and what program. Not all programs as you put it are the problem. Also you cannot blame the unemployed they are unemployed because of the financial crisis. If you pick say Italy and Greece some of their policies are responsible but not all. Some of their problems were down to their irresponsibility and all the countries in Europe don't operate the same way.
  • Rodney Angi 2011/12/08 20:35:39
    Rodney
    +2
    Let's have a look at the European way, shall we?
    Current European tax Rates



    United Kingdom
    Income Tax: 50%
    VAT: 17.5% TOTAL: 67.5%

    France
    Income Tax: 40%
    VAT: 19.6% TOTAL: 59.6%

    Greece
    Income Tax: 40%
    VAT: 25% TOTAL: 65%

    Spain
    Income Tax: 45%
    VAT: 16% TOTAL: 61%

    Portugal
    Income Tax: 42%
    VAT: 20% TOTAL: 62%

    Sweden
    Income Tax: 55%
    VAT: 25% TOTAL: 80%

    Norway
    Income Tax: 54.3%
    VAT: 25% TOTAL: 79.3%

    Netherlands
    Income Tax: 52%
    VAT: 19% TOTAL: 71%

    Denmark
    Income Tax: 58%
    VAT: 25% TOTAL: 83%

    Finland
    Income Tax: 53%
    VAT: 22% TOTAL: 75%

    If you've started to wonder what the real costs of socialism are going to be - once the full program in these United States hits your wallet, take a look at the table. As you digest these mind-boggling figures, keep in mind that in spite of these astronomical tax rates, these countries are still not financing their social welfare programs exclusively from tax revenues! They are deeply mired in public debt of gargantuan proportions. Greece has reached the point where its debt is so huge it is in imminent danger of defaulting. ...





    Let's have a look at the European way, shall we?
    Current European tax Rates



    United Kingdom
    Income Tax: 50%
    VAT: 17.5% TOTAL: 67.5%

    France
    Income Tax: 40%
    VAT: 19.6% TOTAL: 59.6%

    Greece
    Income Tax: 40%
    VAT: 25% TOTAL: 65%

    Spain
    Income Tax: 45%
    VAT: 16% TOTAL: 61%

    Portugal
    Income Tax: 42%
    VAT: 20% TOTAL: 62%

    Sweden
    Income Tax: 55%
    VAT: 25% TOTAL: 80%

    Norway
    Income Tax: 54.3%
    VAT: 25% TOTAL: 79.3%

    Netherlands
    Income Tax: 52%
    VAT: 19% TOTAL: 71%

    Denmark
    Income Tax: 58%
    VAT: 25% TOTAL: 83%

    Finland
    Income Tax: 53%
    VAT: 22% TOTAL: 75%

    If you've started to wonder what the real costs of socialism are going to be - once the full program in these United States hits your wallet, take a look at the table. As you digest these mind-boggling figures, keep in mind that in spite of these astronomical tax rates, these countries are still not financing their social welfare programs exclusively from tax revenues! They are deeply mired in public debt of gargantuan proportions. Greece has reached the point where its debt is so huge it is in imminent danger of defaulting. That is the reason the European economic community has intervened to bail them out. If you're following the financial news, you know Spain and Portugal are right behind Greece .

    The United States is now heading right down the same path. The VAT tax in the table is the national sales tax that Europeans pay. Stay tuned because that is exactly what you can expect to see the administration proposing after the fall elections. The initial percentage in the United States isn't going to be anywhere near the outrageous numbers you now see in Europe . Guess what. the current outrageous numbers in Europedidn't start out as outrageous either. They started out as minuscule - right around the 1% or 2% where they will start out in the United States. Magically, however, they ran up over the years to where they are now. Expect the same thing here.

    It is the very notion that with hard work and perseverance, anybody can get ahead economically here in the USA . Do you think that can ever happen with tax rates between 60% and 80%? Think again. With the government taking that percentage of your money, your life will be exactly like life in Europe ... You will never be able to buy a home. You will never buy a car. You will never send your children to college. Let's not shuffle the battle cry of the socialists under the rug either. It's always the same cry. Equalize income. Spread the wealth to the poor (whoever they are). Level the economic playing field. Accomplish that and everything will be rosy.

    It's time to take a really hard look at reality. Greece is a perfect example. Despite the socialism system that has ruled this country for decades, with a 65% tax rate, they are drowning in public debt, would have defaulted without hundreds of billions in bailout money from the EU, and still. . . 20% of their population lives in poverty. What has all that socialism money bought, besides ultimate power for the politicians running the show? Do you think these people are "free"? They're not. They are slaves to their economic "system."
    (more)
  • Angi Rodney 2011/12/08 20:50:49
    Angi
    There is a difference and alot of the countries you list are in the Eurozone. Its established that alot of them went in to this currency at the wrong rate and had a high level of debt to begin with. In regards to the UK, yeah some people are taxed alot and the VAT rate is 20% now, so taxed more. But just because they don't do something like in the US dosen't mean its wrong everywhere else. The banking crisis started in the US. In regards to Europe and I mean the EU, I don't like it, and we in the UK need to be careful not to sign away our sovereignty. There is a meeting now to establish a treaty in Europe because of the failings in the Eurozone and their new treaty is totally something the British don't want. There may be a referendum in this country regarding Europe and I would rather welcome a referendum than the Primeminister signing away our rights. I am
    concerned about what is happening in Europe but it is not socialism its a capitalist system. I disagree with most of your points and your notion of the most of the British tax payer paying taxes is flawed, because like in the US some evade tax.
    In the US yourselves are slaves to your economic system and the disaster of this financial crisis could have been prevented but it was capitalist ventures that have caused this fiaisco.
  • Rodney Angi 2011/12/08 20:59:15
    Rodney
    +1
    The point I was attempting to make was that government cannot be everything to everyone and hand out these freebies so easily without SOMEONE having to pay. Here, we once had personal responsibility. We were responsible for ourselves. Charitable giving was much greater to help those who needed it and our tax rates much smaller. Now however, it looks as though we may have to assume the the more oppressive and damaging tax rates of the EU in order to cover the debt OUR government has run up with their give-aways.
  • Angi Rodney 2011/12/08 21:17:39
    Angi
    Some of what you list as freebies you may consider to be our NHS in Britian we don't consider this a giveaway. May be we do pay alot in tax but we depend on some of those services. You may think that is depending on the Government but our Government is not that far away. I can visit my MP's office tomorrow if I wish there will be someone their to help me. I can get a appointment to see my MP and make a phone call if I want to speak to staff in a Ministers office. I am no fan of my present Government I don't trust them and feel we have been let down, but so has everyone. No body thinks that Government can give everyone something or will solve all problems. I cannot speak for other countries but in the UK we don't. But what we do think here is that the Government is answerable to the people who vote them into office and not the other way round. And unfortunately I do not live in a fair society, but I do believe I have a voice in it. I recognise some of what you say about giving to charity, but the owness is on the individual and what that person can give. I watched a documentary recently on the way bankers in Victorian times gave away their wealth, or assisted their communities because it was deemed avarice to have too much wealth. I do not think that everyone was up...
    Some of what you list as freebies you may consider to be our NHS in Britian we don't consider this a giveaway. May be we do pay alot in tax but we depend on some of those services. You may think that is depending on the Government but our Government is not that far away. I can visit my MP's office tomorrow if I wish there will be someone their to help me. I can get a appointment to see my MP and make a phone call if I want to speak to staff in a Ministers office. I am no fan of my present Government I don't trust them and feel we have been let down, but so has everyone. No body thinks that Government can give everyone something or will solve all problems. I cannot speak for other countries but in the UK we don't. But what we do think here is that the Government is answerable to the people who vote them into office and not the other way round. And unfortunately I do not live in a fair society, but I do believe I have a voice in it. I recognise some of what you say about giving to charity, but the owness is on the individual and what that person can give. I watched a documentary recently on the way bankers in Victorian times gave away their wealth, or assisted their communities because it was deemed avarice to have too much wealth. I do not think that everyone was up for giving away money. But things changed I do not vouch for capitalism or socialism or communism none of them work. We are a community whether we like it or not and all though we are individuals we are all connected. I realise you are possibly going to say we depend on Government, to a certain extent we do. I would rather have a Government than just one individual running a country.
    (more)
  • Rodney Angi 2011/12/08 21:26:45
    Rodney
    +1
    Here, we were founded on a different premise and have had a different system of governance. It is spelled out clearly in our constitution. Sadly, over the decades, government has usurped more and more power and with it, taken more freedoms away.
  • Angi Rodney 2011/12/08 21:28:27
    Angi
    +1
    May be. I recognise the US although similiar is very different. I do not believe for one minute their isn't a Government on the planet that isn't corrupt.
  • Rodney Angi 2011/12/08 21:29:11
    Rodney
    +1
    LOL, now we agree!
  • Angi Rodney 2011/12/08 21:37:16
    Angi
    +1
    Well socialist or captalist their is always something to agree on. lol. Merry Christmas.
  • Rodney Angi 2011/12/08 21:39:11
    Rodney
    +1
    Yes, Merry Christmas to you. If you are a member of the Recipe Group, I have place a couple of great holiday cookie recipes there. Have a great one.
  • Angi Rodney 2011/12/08 21:44:03
    Angi
    +1
    Thank you, you too.
  • Annette 2011/11/26 19:17:30
    Annette
    +5
    This should prove interesting in America, not to mention the rest of the world as well.
  • BlueMax372 Annette 2011/11/26 19:19:51
    BlueMax372
    +6
    I like to recall what happened to the air traffic controllers who were warned by Reagan not to strike but they did anyway.
  • Annette BlueMax372 2011/11/26 19:21:58
    Annette
    +4
    I doubt that will happen in England. They are too woosie to do anything that astute.
  • Rodney Annette 2011/11/26 21:04:19
    Rodney
    +4
    LOL, I think England now has some lawmakers who have more backbone and can see how ass backward things are. It will have to be done here to. We simply cannot continue to give these huge benny packages out like candy and not expect for the candy jar to run empty.
  • Annette Rodney 2011/11/27 05:47:49
    Annette
    +2
    Quite correct, Rodney, and I can't wait to see it done.
  • Rodney Annette 2011/11/27 08:49:14
    Rodney
    +2
    Sooner the better, before we ARE Greece!
  • BlueMax372 Annette 2011/12/02 22:19:48
    BlueMax372
    +1
    What's apparently happened in the UK is somewhat akin to what happened to the nationwide telephone strike in Puerto Rico in 1998: The rank and file walked off the job and the supervisors took over. The entire system suddenly began to work more efficiently!
  • Annette BlueMax372 2011/12/03 16:58:20
  • Dale 2011/11/26 18:56:20
    Dale
    +5
    Sounds like the unions across the Pond are just as clueless as the one's on this side. They want it all and to Hell with "everyone else." And with "everyone else" paying for it.
  • Striker 2011/11/26 18:41:07
    Striker
    +5
    We're probably going to need more details in order to really have good discussion about socialist England.
  • Ken 2011/11/26 18:39:09
    Ken
    +6
    Unfunded pensions, go figure.

News & Politics

2013/05/19 22:26:04

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals