SodaHead Celebrates Green Week

Blogs Fef's

Health Care Reform Now! But baby steps.

I think most people agree that we need health care reform. What doesn't need reform? Americans always want to improve and not settle for what we've got.

Instead of making this a knock-down, drag-out fight about BIG government options and mandates on private business, why don't we pass some reform on the things most people can agree upon?

Tort Reform: Democrats and Republicans can agree that we need reform in the area of litigation. The costs of malpractice insurance -- both direct and indirect -- increase the cost of care far too much. Indirect costs include defensive medicine -- tests and procedures the doctors order unnecessarily to avoid lawsuits.

Portability: Individuals should own their plans, not their employers. This would allow people to change jobs and keep their coverage, which helps cover people with pre-existing conditions. Most states don't allow employers to compensate employees for their individual health insurance, effectively outlawing portability.

Interstate competition: Increase the number of providers and competition in order to provide more options and lower costs. Don't make each state an island when it comes to health insurance.

I fear that activists, politics and lobbyists have influenced the reform initiative too much. Let's start with these basic, common sense options today.
You!
Add Photos & Videos
Top Comment
  • +4 raves Michael October 16, 2009 22:22:31
    Michael
    As soon as people get the fact that there is NO rush, we can experiment with different improvements and see what works the best. People keep saying that we can't reform a country like Afghanistan over night, why don't they use their brains to realize that about health care, that expenditures total more than that countries budget and many more!
    View thread
Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Comments
  • +1 raves
    Gem November 05, 2009 15:42:00
    Gem
    Fef- this baby hasn't walked in fifty- sixty years. We need health care reform yesterday. Every day that it is delayed just gives more money to the medical industry. Your post does not cover the most important thing- everybody should be covered for health care- it is a moral imperative. Tort reform - possibly- but it is a red herring as far as reform. States that have tort reform report no change in health care costs- although I am sure that the Insurance companies keep more money. Portability and competition are taken care of by having a number of options that everyone can choose from wherever they live. Finally we need a public option. Fears that it would be government takeover are unfounded and the same ones that were bandied about when social security and medicare were proposed - didn't happen then and won't now. Insurance companies are spending billions fighting a public option because they know that that would be the end of their obscene costs and profits and would provide real competition.
  • +1 raves
    Diane November 05, 2009 03:26:18 (edited)
    Diane
    Fef, have you seen the movie Sicko? I just watched it for the second time, and I cried.

    Volunteers who went to ground zero after 9/11 have had horrendous health problems as a result. And many of them cannot afford health care. In order to receive help from the fund that was set up, a person has to show documentation that they were helping at ground zero, and many cannot.

    In the movie, Michael Moore took four of those people to Cuba. Initially he was trying to get them the free health care that the enemy combatants enjoyed at Guantanamo Bay detention camp. But they couldn't get in. So they went to a hospital in Cuba, and were treated there for free.

    One woman who has had respiratory problems since spending weeks trying to dig out survivors at ground zero, was able to buy the inhalers that helped her to breathe at a pharmacy in Cuba for five cents. In the U.S. each one costs over $100.

    I hope you will watch this movie. Wendell Potter, who was an executive at Cigna, said the movie hit the nail on the head.

    Watch this video.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?...
  • +1 raves
    Wayne October 28, 2009 02:17:40 (edited)
    Wayne
    WOW Fef, Nice work! Very solid information. We all know revisions of the existing laws are the direction we need to go on health care reform Not another government takeover. Thanks for the blog. Ok some of us know LOL!
  • +1 raves
    Fef Wayne October 28, 2009 02:20:33
    Fef
    I didn't suggest "regulation"... I said "reform."
  • +1 raves
    Wayne Fef October 28, 2009 02:40:00
    Wayne
    Opps missed that sorry. Same idea wrong word, Oh well been there done that before.:)
  • +3 raves
    MUGEN ::: 無限 October 17, 2009 00:41:33 (edited)
    MUGEN ::: 無限
    I had to login and answer this LOL.

    Tort Reform : You right on this and this is where Liberals and Democrats both agree point on point.

    Portability : This is where it mostly goes south. Individual plans can get very expensive as we see right now and it's not due to less of competition - there are many insurance companies out there - A single person's health insurance could go all the way up to $300-$400 a month (I'm being very liberal with that amount). How do you expect a person who makes $2000, is a student, pays for college, pays for housing, pays for his bills, pays for car and car insurance afford that? Employee compensation can get shaky easily because some employer will do anything they can to cheat their employees. I used to work at big entertainment company. Weekly I'd work 40-46 hours which is considered full time. Yet they did all they could to keep me as a part time employee, thus no benefits.


    You can't trust everyone fef.

    Interstate competition : There is enough competition now. There are hundreds of big and small insurance companies and all of them try to tear you a new one anyway they can.

    A public option or single payer is a must . There are many families who can't afford health care and many people that have lost jobs. I am already paying taxes and thanks to the company i work for i have health insurance. I would have no problem with my taxes paying someone else's (in need) health insurance.
  • +2 raves
    Fef MUGEN :... October 17, 2009 06:14:37
    Fef
    Tort reform: You wrote "Liberals and Democrats" -- I think you meant Liberals and Conservatives). The Democrats control all of government. Encourage them to pass this -- they can't because their big backers (trial lawyers) won't let them. Here, the special interest groups of the Democrats control them.

    Portability: Individual plans get expensive because we don't have interstate competition and we have too much regulation. Plans get expensive because medical care costs go up. Because of tort reform and other regulations.

    A public option will bankrupt the country like every other government program. Medicare doesn't have adequate funding. Social Security won't last. Should we use the DMV or Post Office as an example? If people want socialism, go to Europe.
  • +1 raves
    MUGEN :... Fef October 17, 2009 18:28:37
    MUGEN ::: 無限
    Yes i meant liberal and conservatives.

    >>> A public option will bankrupt the country like every other government program. Medicare doesn't have adequate funding. Social Security won't last. Should we use the DMV or Post Office as an example? If people want socialism, go to Europe.

    I disagree. A well thought out program will not bankrupt anyone. Just like it hasn't bankrupted all the other western countries -which, mind you, all have universal health care -. Most people pay fees such as premiums, copay and etc. Turn those into taxes and that alone would pay for a universal health care.

    >>> If people want socialism, go to Europe.

    I'd rather fix my country then go and live under someone else's mercy. Plus, do you honestly think moving is as easy as get up, pack and move? come on.
  • +2 raves
    Fef MUGEN :... October 18, 2009 07:26:11
    Fef
    We can't compare America to small, socialist countries. I don't want to end up like them, even if they offer universal, tax-payer funded health care.

    I think people can move a lot easier than creating a Utopian society with universal health care with the quality care and the freedoms we enjoy today. Hollywood elitists have promised for years that they will move to Canada or some socialist type country.
  • Diane Fef November 05, 2009 03:40:03 (edited)
    Diane
    What do you not like about the small, socialist countries? We have policemen, firemen, public schools, public libraries, the postal service, public transportation, etc. So we are also socialist.

    The biggest difference between the U.S. and other countries is that we spend trillions of dollars on wars, like the Iraq War, instead of spending it on our own citizens. If you include the money spent on medical treatment for the wounded soldiers, the Iraq War cost us $3 trillion. And while we were footing the bill rebuilding Iraq, Iraq had a $150 billion surplus from oil revenues.
  • +2 raves
    concerned October 17, 2009 00:34:05
    concerned
    If the insurance companies would not have been taking advage of the american people we would not have a need for a public plan .. and now that the insurance companies have already said that they will be gong up 111% percent it shown how needed a public plan really is
  • +1 raves
    Wayne concerned October 28, 2009 02:23:55 (edited)
    Wayne
    Perfect example of the existing regulations, There is no free health care. Someone has to pay for it. The increase you site is because of the health care bill.The regulations need to be revised to create competition.
  • +2 raves
    concerned Wayne October 28, 2009 23:44:19
    concerned
    The public option will work just like private .. you will pay for it .. those on medicare or medical .. will stay right where they r at .. the public option will just be another plan like the private sector .. for the working man .. just more affordable .. and the private sector does not want the competition .. I like th epublic option because it scares the private sector so much ..
  • Wayne concerned October 29, 2009 01:50:45
    Wayne
    The C.B.O. said it would cost more for every citizen. I watched their representation say exact;y that on cspan during the Senate Finance Committee debates! You need to get all the information before you make inaccurate statements. If the market were open to all states the competition for more market share would lower cost, period. Tort reform would lower malpractice insurance rates for your doctor. Maybe rural areas could actually get doctors back to their communities. If you were actually concerned you would you google the health care bill and read the garbage in it! Right!
  • concerned Wayne October 30, 2009 21:42:46
    concerned
    they still have two bills they r talking about and i do not know which bill u r speaking on
  • Wayne concerned October 31, 2009 01:58:58
    Wayne
    This is a combination of all of them all. The democrats blocked a republican effort to put it on the net for 72 hours prior to a vote. What does that tell you? What are they hiding from us?If it was as good as they say it would be available for review period. The public option is in it and as stated by Obama, Reid, Frank, this is what they need for the health care take over.
  • concerned Wayne October 31, 2009 03:39:29
    concerned
    I have never heard either of them state a public option is what they need for a tke over .. at no time .. please do not lie ... so are u speaking of the senate bill or the house bill both r on line for every one to read ..
  • Wayne concerned October 31, 2009 05:06:24
    Wayne
    I have heard and seen them say it! If you have not don't assume I am lying. I am not like our President! What is not on line is what Reid and the democrats have produced in closed conferences!
  • concerned Wayne October 31, 2009 18:44:18
    concerned
    The whole bill is on line .. and the public option snicks .. not strong enough to bring competition to the insurance companies ..
  • Wayne concerned November 01, 2009 05:06:47
    Wayne
    I know you heard of incrementalism, The government competing with private sector is wrong period. If it is not strong enough to bring competition,why do it? Sorry but that is their reason! There are many way to fix this without takeover period.

About Me

Fef

Fef

Los Angeles, CA, US

January 24, 2007 04:53:33

Having fun mixing it up and expressing myself

View complete profile

or
Cancel