Has Chick-fil-A lost gay customers because of the gay marriage controversy?
Mopeder
2012/08/02 15:37:21
|
|
|||||
|
64 votes
|
|
74% | |||
|
23 votes
|
|
26% | |||
Top Opinion
-
bob 2012/08/02 18:13:22yes





















See what Lewis Black has to say about this issue.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?...
They do not discriminate as employers, the owner simply doesn't believe in gay marriage.
Isn't there something called the First Amendment or something?
Apparently Americans are waking up tot he fact that it's against our nature to allow bullying.
Personally, I think there's nothing wrong with not purchasing things from a restaurant that willing released to the media (a Baptist magazine, yes, but considering they're a popular company it was inevitable the mainstream press would pick it up) their stance on a controversial issue of equality. When Oreo posted a picture of a multicolored cookie, while I supported them, did not feel sorry for their loss of sales from people who are against gay marriage because they would have to be stupid not to predict that. As the president of Chick-fil-a, he should have been prepared for backlash by making his views known during an interview. I support freedom of speech, but I think people need to face the consequences of what they've said no matter how free they are to say it. By saying that he is against gay marriage, many gays and people who support them will stop purchasing from Chick-fil-a--just like a company saying they're for gay marriage will face a boycott from the people who are against it.
My stance that I shared in a nutsell:
If you're a public figure or a company going to release a stance on an issue, positive or negative, you should be prepared for the backlash by those who may be offended by your views.
Obviously they forgot that and also the Rule about not protesting in Public