Has Barack 0bama honored the Presidential Oath of Office he swore? What's your opinion?

by Walt Posted 2012/06/22 04:36:22

Related Topics: Presidential, Swearing, President

92 votes
Read all 120 opinions
Lightning Report View Results and Demographics + View Demographics

Loading Demographics... Click an icon to see demographic results Display unknown and private
	Sure! How could anyone think 0bama hasn't honored his oath?	4 votes	4%
	0bama hasn't even come close to honoring his Oath of Office.	75 votes	82%
	I dunno. Presidents swear an oath? I thought swearing was wrong.	0 votes	0%
	Other. (Please comment.)	13 votes	14%

+26

Add a comment above

U-Dog 2012/06/22 04:44:29

0bama hasn't even come close to honoring his Oath of Office.

+16
Obama is a hard core political collectivist-- everything the founders wrote the constitution to defend this country against. He could no more uphold the oath of office than he could jump the moon-- although I am sure some of his drooling moonbat followers believe he can do that too.
>> See Replies

More polls by Walt

happyday49 2012/07/03 02:45:56

Other. (Please comment.)

+1
He and his staff has dishonored the office. And we know that he is not the first one to do so. But, the others had personal type downfalls, i.e., Clinton. Obama seems to be bent on devaluing our Nation. I also, heard that muslims are told to lie to the embicils (Americans, etc.), soooooo? I don't know if this is true or not. But he seems to be on board from his early teachings in Indonesia or elsewhere. Also, his closet advisor, Valerie Jared, as a child, she and her family, lived in Iran. The close friend in Chicago who is now in jail, who loaned him and Michelle the money to buy their home, has mid-eastern connections, so, I would say he is hiding quite a bit. Associations do count, rather positive or negative, and he did not even have to answer questions regardind his affliations. Oh wait, I think I got off track - lol!! Bye

reply
Roger 2012/06/28 00:35:47 (edited)

0bama hasn't even come close to honoring his Oath of Office.

[...]

reply
MarinerFH 2012/06/28 00:13:41

0bama hasn't even come close to honoring his Oath of Office.

+1
He has broken it every day since he took it.

reply
ordman 2012/06/27 17:44:11

0bama hasn't even come close to honoring his Oath of Office.

+1
I heard the Obama is related to Benedict Arnold. On his mothers side of course.

reply
3003573 to ordman 2012/06/27 18:05:27
ordman to 3003573 2012/06/27 18:45:46

Ho another leaf.

reply
goodguy12 2012/06/27 17:30:44

Other. (Please comment.)

don't care

reply
☆ElenaDiamond☆ 2012/06/27 17:29:33

0bama hasn't even come close to honoring his Oath of Office.

+1
No he hasn't. Just take Fast and Furious as an example. How is that in keeping with his oath of office. He is a liar, and has allowed things to transpire that has been responsible for making us more at risk from radical Islam and things that have killed people. Think Brian Terry.

reply
3003573 to ☆ElenaD... 2012/06/27 18:06:16
☆ElenaD... to 3003573 2012/06/27 18:08:04

+1
If Obama wasn't involved why did he claim executive privilege?

reply
3003573 to ☆ElenaD... 2012/06/27 18:15:41
☆ElenaD... to 3003573 2012/06/27 18:24:13

+1
Oh my goodness. I never watch fox news. You are literally spewing Rachel Maddow talking points.

reply
3003573 to ☆ElenaD... 2012/06/27 18:34:20 (edited)
☆ElenaD... to 3003573 2012/06/27 18:45:01

+1
You present opinion as fact. As for the blocking of Obama. We are tired of him seizing power without going through the proper chanels. Every other President has been able to work with an opposite controlled congress. Who is to blame is an OPINION, not a fact. You seem to have difficulty with this concept.

As for fox news. You seem to really be obsessed with it. I bet you watch it more in a month than I have in my whole life.

reply
Walt to 3003573 2012/06/27 19:05:55

The Tea Parties have nothing to do with Eric Holder lying under oath to Congress or attempting to hide the evidence.

Eric Holder is responsible for Eric Holder. Nobody else is.

Get a clue, moron.

reply
Walt to 3003573 2012/06/27 19:03:41

Under George W. Bush, Operation Gunrunner was run in conjunction with the Mexican authorities. 100% of the guns were confiscated. Each of the weapons contained a GPS tracking device. No border patrol agents were killed. No Mexican citizens were killed.

Under Barack Hussein 0bama, Operation Fast and Furious was not run in cooperation with the Mexican authorities, who knew nothing about it. Few if any of the weapons were confiscated after they made it onto Mexican soil. None of the weapons contained GPS tracking. 2 border patrol agents were killed. Over 300 Mexican citizens were killed.

There is quite a contrast between the two. If you are unable to recognize the difference, it is most likely because you are a retarded 0bama sheep.

reply
happyday49 to 3003573 2012/07/03 02:31:56

+2
President Bush did not start Fast and Furious. That was Obama's and Holder's baby. Yes, Bush did have a program that lasted about 3 months, about 200 or less weapons and each had tracers installed on them, and the Mexican authorities were aware of the program. Dumb a___ OBama and Holder sold/gave over 2,000 weapons to criminals, untraceable, and did not have the brains to tell the Mexican President, and there was no plan to end it until a whistleblower and Ofcr Terry's death. My question is if the previous administration realized this was a bad idea, why did Holder pick it up, and then just as always, didn't want to take responsibility for their own actions!!!!! YOU HEARD ME! Now you have more info. Maybe this will help, but maybe not. I am really tired of these amateur wanna be leaders mucking up everything!

reply
none 2012/06/27 17:26:21

0bama hasn't even come close to honoring his Oath of Office.

+3
Obama is a man without honor, truth, integrity, or respect for anything else but himself.
NOBAMA in 2012!

reply
gregaj7 2012/06/27 06:54:47

Other. (Please comment.)

+1
Which oath are you referring to?

reply
Walt to gregaj7 2012/06/27 07:56:04

+1
Either one; the one where he publicly flubbed it up or the one he supposedly made in private that was the traditional oath of office.

reply
gregaj7 to Walt 2012/06/27 17:04:27

+1
I'm sure he has a few others that are considered to be superseding those.

reply
3003573 to Walt 2012/06/27 18:17:22
Walt to 3003573 2012/06/27 19:07:33

You have obviously not kept track of current events for the past 3 1/2 years.

Do so, then come back to SodaHead and express informed opinions.

Until then, nobody who has kept track of current events will take the nonsense you are spewing seriously.

reply
safari 2012/06/27 05:38:35

Other. (Please comment.)

+1
Remember how he messed up the oath and had to redo it? He wouldn't allow that to be public. (More transparency) So who knows what he swore to. But as far as the oath he was supposed to swear to NO!

reply
3003573 to safari 2012/06/27 18:18:13
safari to 3003573 2012/06/27 18:48:30

+1
I guess you can't blame this one on Bush so it's Roberts' fault. Ok so Roberts got it wrong and obama followed along like the good puppet that he is.

And the next day he took an oath again without a Bible - it was not filmed. And there is no word for what that mess up is called. http://www.washingtonpost.com...

( I bet Roberts' couldn't stomach swearing him in. There was an eligibility issue on the court docket at that time. )

reply
Walt to 3003573 2012/06/27 19:08:41
Christine/Rest in peace Pet... 2012/06/26 06:54:06

0bama hasn't even come close to honoring his Oath of Office.

+2
He could not even say his oath correctly the first time. After that, his actions spoke louder than any of his words

reply
3003573 to Christi... 2012/06/27 18:04:04
will 2012/06/25 23:22:00

0bama hasn't even come close to honoring his Oath of Office.

+2
honor is for the honorable

reply
ajracestables1 2012/06/24 21:23:21

0bama hasn't even come close to honoring his Oath of Office.

+3
The fact that he bypasses congress in major decisions is what brings me to my conclusion.

reply
3003573 to ajraces... 2012/06/27 18:06:42
ajraces... to 3003573 2012/06/28 03:09:38

+1
Immigration, partial birth abortion.

reply
Chi~Cat 2012/06/23 20:12:14

0bama hasn't even come close to honoring his Oath of Office.

+3
Drop back five and punt:

reply
TheTruth1313 2012/06/23 07:35:30

0bama hasn't even come close to honoring his Oath of Office.

+3
Obama is a liar, a failure and an utter embarrassment to this country.

reply
The Duke 2012/06/23 06:13:09

0bama hasn't even come close to honoring his Oath of Office.

+3
His steady and unrelenting assault on the Constitution in trying to establish his socialist nanny-state is in direct conflict with keeping the oath he swore.

reply
3003573 to The Duke 2012/06/27 18:07:29
The Duke to 3003573 2012/06/27 20:00:45

+1
As it happens, I guess I do. Just to be sure, I looked it up in
the dictionary, and the definition was exactly what I thought it to be:
"A system or condition of society in which the means of production are
owned and/or controlled by the state". By extension, the rewards of
that production would also be controlled by the state, hence
"nanny-state" is quite appropriate.

reply
JohnnyRudick 2012/06/22 22:51:12

0bama hasn't even come close to honoring his Oath of Office.

+4
How can you honor an office you should not even occupy in the first place?

reply
safari to JohnnyR... 2012/06/27 05:39:26

+3

reply